Skip to main content

War and the ‘Brotherhood of Hooliganism’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Politics of International Political Theory
  • 401 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter embraces the notion of international political theory as ‘Applied Political Philosophy’, and recognises Chris Brown’s special contribution to it. Brown’s most recent book—International Society, Global Polity—is then used as a provocation to examine the ‘International Society’ mindset on the critical problematique of war. The chapter confronts, in particular, Brown’s largely uncritical view of Hedley Bull’s conception of war as an institution of the ‘society of states’, and his positive endorsement of Michael Walzer’s development of the ‘Just War’ tradition. Underlying the chapter is a critique of an international political theory calculated to legitimate a delusional common sense when applied to the challenges confronting human society globally in an era of world-historical crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allott, P. (1998). The Future of the Human Past. In K. Booth (Ed.), Statecraft and Security. The Cold War and Beyond (pp. 323–337). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1970). On Violence. Orlando: Harvest Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (1979). Strategy and Ethnocentrism. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (1991). Security in Anarchy. Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice. Review of International Studies, 67(3), 527–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (1995). Dare Not to Know: International Relations Theory Versus the Future. In K. Booth & S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theory Today (pp. 328–350). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2000). Ten Flaws of Just Wars. International Journal of Human Rights, 4(3–4), 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2007). Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2009). Changing Global Realities: Critical Theory for Critical Times. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies, 1(2), 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2011). Realism and World Politics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2014a). International Relations. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2014b). Global Security. In M. Kaldor & I. Rangelov (Eds.), The Handbook of Global Security Policy (pp. 13–30). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (2017). What’s the Point of IR? The International in the Invention of Humanity. In T. Dyvik, J. Selby, & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), What’s the Point of International Relations? (pp. 21–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K., & Erskine, T. (2016). Introduction: The Argumentative Discipline. In K. Booth & T. Erskine (Eds.), International Relations Theory Today (pp. 1–19). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (1992). International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2015). International Society, Global Polity. An Introduction to International Political Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. (2016). Theory and Practice in International Relations. In K. Booth & T. Erskine (Eds.), International Relations Theory Today (pp. 39–52). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, K., & Novick, L. (2017). The Vietnam War. A Film: Episode 5, ‘This Is What We Do’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1966). The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, I. (2015). Waging War – A New Philosophical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coker, C. (2018). Still ‘The Human Thing’? Technology, Human Agency and the Future of War. International Relations, 32(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist, The. (2018, January 27–February 2). A Special Report, The Next War. The Growing Threat of Great-Power Conflict.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, R. A., & Kim, S. S. (1980). The War System: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, L. (2017). Force and the International Community: Blair’s Chicago Speech and the Criteria for Intervention. International Relations, 31(2), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. (1988). Power Politics and War Cultures. Review of International Studies, 14(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2015). Realism and the Relativity of Judgement. International Relation, 29(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, F. (2011). Shocked and Awed: How the War on Terror and Jihad Have Changed the English Language. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, O., & Shapiro, S. (2017). The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M., & Paret, P. (Eds. and Trans.) (1989). Clausewitz: On War [1st pub. 1832]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent, The. (2017, September 19). Donald Trump’s America First Doctrine will Destroy the United Nations. Online. Available at: www.independent.co.uk/trump-un-speech-america-first. Accessed 15 Feb 2018.

  • Keal, P. (2017). Beyond ‘War in the Strict Sense. In T. Dunne & C. Reus-Smit (Eds.), The Globalization of International Society (pp. 165–184). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K. (1966). On the Uses of Military Power in the Nuclear Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laswell, H. D. (1950). Politics. Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley-French, J., & Boyer, Y. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford Handbook of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1968). Clausewitz: On War. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stairs, D. (1998). Of Medium Powers and Middling Roles. In K. Booth (Ed.), Statecraft and Security. The Cold War and Beyond (pp. 270–286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stampp, K. M. (1989 [1956]). The Peculiar Institution. Slavery in the Ante-Bellum South. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachey, A. (1957). The Unconscious Motives of War. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagore, R. (2012 [1st pub. 1917]). Nationalism. New Delhi: Niyogi Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1959). Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (2008). Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics. In K. Waltz (Ed.), Realism and International Politics (pp. 332–345). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (2015). Just and Unjust War (5th ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G. (2009). What Happened to the Idea of World Government? International Studies Quarterly, 53(2), 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, H., & Booth, K. (1996). Kant: Theorist Beyond Limits. In I. Clark & I. B. Neumann (Eds.), Classical Theories of International Relations (pp. 71–98). Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Booth, K. (2019). War and the ‘Brotherhood of Hooliganism’. In: Albert, M., Lang Jr., A. (eds) The Politics of International Political Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93278-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics