Abstract
Biloslavo et al. add a much-needed new lens to understanding the nature of sustainable business models. Drawing on an interdisciplinary approach and adopting a Jungian dialectical approach, they explore the connections between organizational identity, paradoxes, and sustainable business model innovation. A sustainable business model framework termed the “Value Triangle” is applied to an illustrative case study of Japanese firm Muji. The result is a new perspective on designing sustainable business models incorporating paradoxical characteristics of organizational identity. This chapter supports the contention that organizational identity and sustainable business models can be mutually constitutive.
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We use the notion “unchanged” in a sense of not-transformed but it can be re-interpreted. Re-interpretation as a bridge between the position of the organization in the relevant external environments and the internal meanings formed around cherished organizational values, beliefs, and purpose.
- 2.
Paradox is a “persistent contradiction between interdependent elements” (Schad et al. 2016, p. 6).
- 3.
In the literature about organizational identity, we can find discussion about individual identity and the cognitive link that exists between it and organizational identity; however, we will limit our discussion on organizational level only as we are interested on organizational identity as a shared cognitive schema.
- 4.
An ideal type sustainable organization is in our view an organization that persists in time.
- 5.
Johnson and Scholes (2002, p. 239) define a mission statement as “a generalized statement of the overriding purpose of an organization. It can be thought of as an expression of its raison d’être.” Similarly, Leuthesser and Kohli (1997) say that mission is necessary in helping a company form its identity, purpose, and direction.
- 6.
As such, paradoxes cannot be solved but could be only navigated through “both-and” thinking toward “workable actions” that prevent possible paralysis or drift to the one pole of paradoxes. We will use the notion of “solving” for purely practical reasons of transparency and ease of understanding. As Lüscher and Lewis (2008, p. 234) say, a positive outcome of “working through” paradox is achieved not by “eliminating or resolving paradox, but [by] constructing a more workable certainty.”
- 7.
Description of Muji is based on Internet contribution by Peron, A. 2015. Muji, la filosofia del design essenziale e atemporale (http://www.thismarketerslife.it/stories/muji-la-filosofia-del-design-essenziale-e-atemporale/) and information available on company website.
References
Alessandri, S.W. 2001. Modeling Corporate Identity: A Concept Explication and Theoretical Explanation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 6 (4): 173–182.
Anderson, R.C. 1998. Mid-course Correction: Toward a Sustainable Enterprise: The Interface Model. Atlanta, GA: Peregrinzilla Press.
Anthony, C., and M. Tripsas. 2016. Organizational Identity and Innovation. In Oxford Handbook of Organizational Identity, ed. M. Pratt, M. Schultz, and B.E. Ashforth, 417–435. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ashforth, B.E., and F. Mael. 1996. Organizational Identity and Strategy as a Context for the Individual. Advances in Strategic Management 13: 19–64.
Baden-Fuller, C., and S. Haefliger. 2013. Business Models and Technological Innovation. Long Range Planning 46 (6): 419–426.
Baden-Fuller, C., and V. Mangematin. 2013. Business Models: A Challenging Agenda. Strategic Organization 11 (4): 418–427.
Bagnoli, C., and G. Biotto. 2014. Il caso Muji, Sincronizzare missione/visione, strategia e modello di business attraverso i significati. Venice, Italy: Ca’ Foscari University.
Baldassarre, B., G. Calabretta, N.M.P. Bocken, and T. Jaskiewicz. 2017. Bridging Sustainable Business Model Innovation and User-Driven Innovation: A Process for Sustainable Value Proposition Design. Journal of Cleaner Production 147: 175–186.
Bansal, P. 2002. The Corporate Challenges of Sustainable Development. Academy of Management Executive 16 (2): 122–131.
Barney, J., S. Bunderson, P. Foreman, L. Gustafson, A. Huff, L. Martins, R. Reger, Y. Saranson, and L. Stimpert. 1998. A Strategy Conversation on the Topic of Organization Identity. In Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations, ed. D.A. Whetten and P.C. Godfrey, 99–168. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Battistella, C., G. Biotto, and A.F. De Toni. 2012. From Design Driven Innovation to Meaning Strategy. Management Decision 50 (4): 718–743.
Biloslavo, R., C. Bagnoli, and D. Edgar. 2018. An Eco-critical Perspective on Business Models: The Value Triangle as an Approach to Closing the Sustainability Gap. Journal of Cleaner Production 174: 746–762.
Bocken, N., S. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2013. A Value Mapping Tool for Sustainable Business Modelling. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 13 (5): 482–497.
Bocken, N.M.P., S.W. Short, P. Rana, and S. Evans. 2014. A Literature and Practice Review to Develop Sustainable Business Model Archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production 65 (15): 42–56.
Brady, F.N., and D.W. Hart. 2006. An Aesthetic Theory of Conflict in Administrative Ethics. Administration & Society 38 (1): 113–134.
Bromley, D.B. 1993. Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Brooks, S., S.B. Ivory, and S.B. Brooks. 2018. Managing Corporate Sustainability with a Paradoxical Lens: Lessons from Strategic Agility. Journal of Business Ethics 148 (2): 347–361.
Caldera, H.T.S., C. Desha, and L. Dawes. 2017. Exploring the Role of Lean Thinking in Sustainable Business Practice: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production 167: 1546–1565.
Cascio, W.F. 2006. Decency Means More Than “always low prices”: A Comparison of Costco to Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club. Academy of Management Perspectives 20 (3): 26–37.
De Wit, B., and R. Meyer. 2005. Strategy Synthesis: Resolving Strategy Paradoxes to Create Competitive Advantage. 2nd ed. London: Thomson.
Dutton, J.E., J.M. Dukerich, and C.V. Harqauil. 1994. Organizational Images and Member Identification. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (2): 239–263.
Epstein, M., A.R. Buhovac, and K. Yuthas. 2015. Managing Social, Environmental and Financial Performance Simultaneously. Long Range Planning 48 (1): 35–45.
Fiol, C.M. 2002. Capitalizing on Paradox: The Role of Language in Transforming Organizational Identities. Organization Science 13 (6): 653–666.
Gao, J., and P. Bansal. 2013. Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 112: 241–255.
Gioia, D.A. 1998. From Individual to Organizational Identity. In Identity in Organizations: Developing Theory Through Conversations, ed. D. Whetten and P. Godfrey, 17–31. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gioia, D.A., and J.B. Thomas. 1996. Identity, Image and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking During Strategic Change in Academia. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (3): 370–403.
Gubrium, J.F., and J.A. Holstein. 2008. Narrative Ethnography. In Handbook of Emergent Methods, ed. S.N. Hesse-Biber and P. Leavy, 241–264. New York: Guilford Press.
Haggege, M., and L. Collet 2011. Exploring New Business Models with a Narrative Perspective. Paper presented at the 18th International Product Development Management Conference, The Netherlands: Delft, June 5–7, 2011.
Hahn, T., F. Figge, J. Pinkse, and L. Preuss. 2010. Trade-offs in Corporate Sustainability: You Can’t Have Your Cake and Eat It. Business Strategy and the Environment 19 (4): 217–229.
———. 2018. A Paradox Perspective on Corporate Sustainability: Descriptive, Instrumental, and Normative Aspects. Journal of Business Ethics 148 (2): 235–248.
Hahn, T., J. Pinkse, L. Preuss, and F. Figge. 2016. Ambidexterity for Corporate Social Performance. Organization Studies 37 (2): 213–235.
Hahn, T., L. Preuss, J. Pinkse, and F. Figge. 2014. Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Sensemaking with Paradoxical and Business Case Frames. Academy of Management Review 39 (4): 463–487.
Hamilton, A., and D.A. Gioia. 2009. Fostering Sustainability-Focused Organizational Identities. In Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations, ed. L.M. Roberts and J.E. Dutton, 435–460. New York: Routledge.
Handy, C. 1994. The Age of Paradox. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hara, K. 2011. The Design Guru of MUJI on His Uniquely Japanese Aesthetic. Accessed November 18, 2017. http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/661909.shtml.
Hatch, M.J., and M. Schultz. 2002. The Dynamics of Organizational Identity. Human Relations 55 (8): 989–1017.
Hatch, M.J., and D. Yanow. 2008. Methodology by Metaphor: Painting and the Study of Organizational Identity. Organization Studies 29 (1): 23–44.
Iivonen, K. 2018. Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes—Have Your Coke and Drink It Too! Journal of Business Ethics 148 (2): 309–327.
Ind, N. 1990. The Corporate Image. Strategies for Effective Identity Programmes. London: Kogan Page.
Issa, T., and D. Pick. 2010. Ethical Mindsets: An Australian Study. Journal of Business Ethics 96 (4): 613–629.
Johnson, M.W. 2010. Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Johnson, M.W., C.M. Christensen, and H. Kagermann. 2008. Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review 86: 50–59.
Johnson, G., and K. Scholes. 2002. Exploring Corporate Strategy. 6th ed. London: Prentice Hall.
Joyce, A., and R.L. Paquin. 2016. The Triple Layered Business Model Canvas—A Tool to Design More Sustainable Business Models. Journal of Cleaner Production 135 (1): 1474–1486.
Jung, C.G. 1991. L’uomo e i suoi simboli. Milano: Tascabili Editori Associati.
Kim, C.W., and R. Mauborgne. 1998. Value Innovation: The Strategic Logic of High Growth. Harvard Business Review 75 (1): 102–112.
Kogut, B., and U. Zander. 1996. What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science 7 (5): 502–518.
Kovoor-Misra, S. 2009. Understanding Perceived Organizational Identity During Crisis And Change: A Threat/Opportunity Framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management 22 (5): 494–510.
Leuthesser, L., and C. Kohli. 1997. Corporate Identity: The Role of Mission Statements. Business Horizons 40 (3): 59–66.
Lewis, M.W. 2000. Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. Academy of Management Review 25 (4): 760–776.
Lüscher, L.S., and M.W. Lewis. 2008. Organizational Change and Managerial Sensemaking: Working Through Paradox. Academy of Management Journal 51: 221–240.
March, J.G. 1988. Decisions and Organizations. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Martins, L.L., V.P. Rindova, and B.E. Greenbaum. 2015. Unlocking the Hidden Value of Concepts: A Cognitive Approach to Business Model Innovation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 9 (1): 99–117.
Miles, M.B., A.M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Mitchell, D., and C. Coles. 2003. The Ultimate Competitive Advantage of Continuing Business Model Innovation. Journal of Business Strategy 24 (5): 15–21.
Morrison, J., N. Fukasawa, and K. Hara. 2010. Muji. New York: Rizzoli.
Morsing, M., and A. Roepstorff. 2015. CSR as Corporate Political Activity: Observations on IKEA’s CSR Identity–Image Dynamics. Journal of Business Ethics 128 (2): 395–409.
Nag, R., K.G. Corley, and D.A. Gioia. 2007. The Intersection of Organizational Identity, Knowledge and Practice: Attempting Strategic Change Via Knowledge Grafting. Academy of Management Journal 50 (4): 821–847.
Navis, C. and Glynn, M. A. 2010. How New Market Categories Emerge: Temporal Dynamics of Legitimacy, Identity, and Entrepreneurship in Satellite Radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55 (3): 439–471.
Pohle, G., and M. Chapman. 2006. IBM’s Global CEO Report 2006: Business Model Innovation Matters. Strategy & Leadership 34 (5): 34–40.
Poole, M. S. and Van De Ven, A. H. 1989. Using Paradox to Build Management and Organization Theories. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 562–578.
Quinn, R.E., and K.S. Cameron. 1988. Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Framework of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Schad, J., Lewis, M W., Raisch, S. and Smith, W. K. 2016. Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward. The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 10. No. 1, pp. 5–64.
Schaltegger, S., F. Lüdeke-Freund, and E.G. Hansen. 2012. Business Cases for Sustainability: The Role of Business Model Innovation for Corporate Sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development 6 (2): 95–119.
———. 2016. Business Models for Sustainability: A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. Organization & Environment 29 (3): 264–289.
Scott, S. G. and Lane, V. R. 2000. A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 43–62.
Smith, W.K. 2014. Dynamic Decision Making: A Model of Senior Leaders Managing Strategic Paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal 57 (6): 1592–1623.
Smith, W.K., and M.W. Lewis. 2011. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 381–403.
Spieth, P., D. Schneckenberg, and J.E. Ricart. 2014. Business Model Innovation—State of the Art and Future Challenges for the Field. R&D Management 44 (3): 237–247.
Stubbs, W., and C. Cocklin. 2008. Conceptualizing a “Sustainability Business Model”. Organization & Environment 21 (2): 103–127.
Van der Byl, C.A., and N. Slawinski. 2015. Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: A Review of Research From Win-Wins and Trade-Offs to Paradoxes and Beyond. Organization & Environment 28 (1): 54–79.
van der Have, R. P. and Rubalcaba, L. 2016. Social Innovation Research: An Emerging Area of Innovation Studies?. Research Policy, Vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 1923–1935.
Verganti, R. 2009. Design-Driven innovation. Cambiare le regole della competizione innovando radicalmente il significato dei prodotti e dei servizi. Rizzoli Editore.
Weick, K. E. and Browning, L. D. 1986. Argument and Narration in Organizational Communication. Journal of Management, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 243–259.
Wirtz, B.W., O. Schilke, and S. Ullrich. 2010. Strategic Development of Business Models: Implications of the Web 2.0 for Creating Value on the Internet. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 272–290.
Zott, C., Amit, R. and Massa, L. 2011. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 1019–1042.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Biloslavo, R., Edgar, D., Bagnoli, C. (2019). Organizational Identity and Value Triangle: Management of Jungian Paradoxes to Enable Sustainable Business Model Innovation. In: Aagaard, A. (eds) Sustainable Business Models. Palgrave Studies in Sustainable Business In Association with Future Earth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93275-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93274-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93275-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)