Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business pp 179–204Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Engagement Dialogue as a Nordic Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) Strategy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter explores engagement dialogue as a sustainable and responsible investment (SRI) strategy from a Nordic investor perspective. The Nordic model of engagement dialogue is grounded in the Nordic model of corporate governance and stakeholder capitalism. Based on a proprietary database from a professional SRI agent, this chapter conducts an in-depth analysis of engagement dialogue between Nordic institutional investors and MSCI World companies regarding environmental, social, and corruption risks. The main characteristics of the Nordic model of engagement dialogue are an incident-based approach, norm-based compliance, a small number of engagement cases, and long-term emphasis on risk reduction as opposed to short-term financial gains. The chapter notes that successful forms of engagement dialogue target global companies with higher levels of pre-engagement environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance, ESG transparency, and operating performance than a matched sample. Their performance remains superior to the matched sample in the post-engagement period. The chapter consequently extends previous literature on SRI strategies in the Anglo-Saxon model of activism based on shareholder resolutions, whereby companies are targeted owing to corporate governance risks and low financial performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Marquez, R. (2007). Stakeholder capitalism, corporate governance and firm value. Retrieved from http://finance.wharton.upenn.edu/~allenf/download/Vita/JF-MS6731-Revision-corporate-governance-with-figures-16sep09-final.pdf.

  • Blowfield, M., & Murray, A. (2014). Corporate responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Clark, G. L., & Viehs, M. (2013). The geography of shareholder engagement: Evidence from a large British institutional investor (SSRN Working Paper). Maastricht: Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Maastricht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R., Moers, F., & Viehs, M. (2015). Who withdraws shareholder proposals and does it matter? An analysis of sponsor identity and pay practices. Corporate Governance: An International Review,23(6), 472–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becht, A., Franks, J., Mayer, C., & Rossi, S. (2009). Returns to shareholder activism: Evidence from a clinical study of the Hermes UK focus fund. The Review of Financial Studies,22(8), 3093–3129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, E. (2008). Socially responsible investing in Scandinavia—A comparative analysis. Sustainable Development,16, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2017). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3667-3.

  • Carleton, W., Nelson, J., & Weisbach, M. (1998). The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF. Journal of Finance,53(4), 1335–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., Salo, J., & Hebb, T. (2008). Social and environmental shareholder activism in the public spotlight: US corporate annual meetings, campaign strategies, and environmental performance, 2001–04. Environment and Planning A,40(6), 1370–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, P., Bloom, M., & Hillman, A. (2007). Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal,28, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deegan, C. (2015). Financial accounting theory. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Guercio, D., & Hawkins, J. (1999). The motivation and impact of pension fund activism. Journal of Financial Economics,52, 293–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., & de Bakker, F. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review,32(3), 901–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson, E., Karakas, O., & Li, X. (2015). Active ownership. The Review of Financial Studies,28(12), 3225–3268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurosif. (2016). European SRI study. Retrieved from http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/SRI-study-2016-HR.pdf.

  • Ferraro, F., & Beunza, D. (2014). Why talk? A process model of dialogue in shareholder engagement (SSRN Working Paper). Barcelona: IESE Business School, University of Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2000). Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics,57(2), 275–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, S., & Starks, L. (2007). The evolution of shareholder activism in the United States. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,19(1), 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjolberg, M. (2010). Varieties of corporate social responsibility (CSR): CSR meets the “Nordic Model”. Regulation & Government,4, 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goranova, M., Abouk, R., Nystrom, P., & Ehsan, S. (2017). Corporate governance antecedents to shareholder activism: A zero-inflated process. Strategic Management Journal,38(2), 415–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goranova, M., & Ryan, L. (2014). Shareholder activism: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management,40, 1230–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, J., Serafeim G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Shareholder activism on sustainability issues (SSRN Working Paper). Boston: Harvard Business School, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (2010). Control of corporate decisions: Shareholders vs. management (SSRN Working Paper). Chicago: University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, I., & Eriksson, J. (2011). Influence strategies in shareholder engagement: A case study of all Swedish National Pension Funds. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment,1(1), 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henisz, W., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. (2014). Spinning gold: The financial and operational returns to external stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal,35(12), 1727–1748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics,115, 304–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekvall, P. (2014). The Nordic corporate governance model. Stockholm: TMG Sthlm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. (2016). Corporate governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, T., & Nordberg, D. (2016). Ownership, activism and engagement: Institutional investors as active owners. Corporate Governance: An International Review,24(3), 346–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulsen, T., Strand, T., & Thomsen, S. (2010). Voting power and shareholder activism: A study of Swedish shareholder meetings. Corporate Governance: An International Review,18(4), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, K., Logsdon, J., & Van Buren, H. (2013). Corporate responses to shareholder activists: Considering the dialogue alternative. Journal of Business Ethics,112, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E., & Toffel, M. (2009). Responding to public and private politics: Corporate disclosure of climate change strategies. Strategic Management Journal,30, 1157–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B., & Sievänen, R. (2013). Drivers of socially responsible investing: A case study of four Nordic countries. Journal of Business Ethics,115, 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semenova, N., Hassel, L., & Nilsson, H. (2010). The value relevance of environmental and social performance: Evidence from Swedish SIX 300 companies. The Finnish Journal of Business Economics,3, 265–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. P. (1996). Shareholder activism by institutional investors: Evidence from CalPERS. Journal of Finance,51(1), 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2014). Scandinavia can be inspiration for creating shared value. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/84bbd770-b34d-11e3-b09d-00144feabdc0.

  • Strand, R., & Freeman, R. (2015). Scandinavian cooperative advantage: The theory and practice of stakeholder engagement in Scandinavia. Journal of Business Ethics,127, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, S., & Conyon, M. (2012). Corporate governance: Mechanisms and systems. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver-Cohen, D., & Bronn, P. (2015). Reputation, responsibility, and stakeholder support in Scandinavian firms: A comparative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics,127, 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Mao, C. (2015). Shareholder activism of public pension funds: The political facet. Journal of Banking & Finance,60, 138–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamahaki, C., & Frynas, G. (2016). Institutional determinants of private shareholder engagement in Brazil and South Africa: The role of regulation. Corporate Governance: An International Review,24(5), 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden

    Lars G. Hassel

  2. School of Business and Economics, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Natalia Semenova

Authors
  1. Lars G. Hassel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natalia Semenova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Semenova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

    Susanne Arvidsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hassel, L.G., Semenova, N. (2019). Engagement Dialogue as a Nordic Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI) Strategy. In: Arvidsson, S. (eds) Challenges in Managing Sustainable Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93266-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation