Advertisement

A Critical Perspective on Sustainability Assurance

  • Thomas CarringtonEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Assurance is becoming increasingly popular as a way to enhance the confidence of sustainability reports. But what does assurance of sustainability reports mean? To answer this question, the chapter treats assurance as a word with a regulatory and etymological history, which prescribes a specific and particular interpretation of the term assurance. It is observed that sustainability assurance inherits a specific theory with a particular form of evaluating and making authoritative statements on sustainability practice from (financial) auditing. The theory it draws on is agency theory, and the form of evaluation is the indirect evaluation of statements of compliance with standards instead of a direct assessment of sustainability performance or quality. The chapter suggests that this may be problematic since, although assurance may add credibility and confidence to sustainability reporting it does not challenge the perspectives taken by the company, which, it is argued, was the problem in the first place, as suggested by the Brundtland report. This theory of the practice is, however, not the only interpretation of the word audit. Drawing on alternative historical and etymological meanings of the word audit, the possibilities of other forms of sustainability audit are advanced.

Keywords

Assurance Sustainability Audit Agency theory 

References

  1. American Accounting Association. (1973). Studies in accounting research No. 6: Statement of basic auditing concepts. Sarasota, FL: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Bovens, M. (1998). The quest for responsibility: Accountability and citizenship in complex organisations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “Our common future”, United Nations.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, T. (2007). Framing audit failure: Four studies on audit quality discomforts. Stockholm University School of Business.Google Scholar
  5. Carrington, T. (2011). Ansvarsfullhet är viktigare än att följa regler. Balans, 37(1), 42–43.Google Scholar
  6. Carrington, T. (2014). Revision. Stockholm: Liber. Google Scholar
  7. Farooq, M. B., & de Villiers, C. (2017). The market for sustainability assurance services. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuhrmann, S., Ott, C., Looks, E., & Guenther, T. W. (2016). The contents of assurance statements for sustainability reports and information asymmetry. Accounting and Business Research, 47(4), 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Global Reporting Initiative. (2013a). GRI G4 reporting principles and standard disclosures. Google Scholar
  10. Global Reporting Initiative. (2013b). GRI G4 reporting principles and implementation manual.Google Scholar
  11. Hodge, K., Subramaniam, N., & Stewart, J. (2009). Assurance of sustainability reports: Impact on report users’ confidence and perceptions of information credibility. Australian Accounting Review, 19(3), 178–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Humphrey, C., Moizer, P., & Turley, S. (1992). The audit expectations gap—Plus ca change, plus vest la meme chose? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(2), 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IAASB. (2017). Handbook of international auditing, assurance, and ethics pronouncements. New York: International Federation of Accountants. Google Scholar
  14. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. KPMG. (2017). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from kpmg.com/crreporting.
  16. O’Dwyer, B. (2011). The case of sustainability assurance: Constructing a new assurance service. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 28(4), 1230–1266.Google Scholar
  17. O’Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. (2007). Seeking stakeholder-centric sustainability assurance. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 25(Spring), 77–94. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Dwyer, B., & Unerman, J. (2016). Fostering rigour in accounting for social sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49, 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pentland, B. (2000). Will auditors take over the world? Program, technique and the verification of everything. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(3), 307–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Power, M. (1996). Making things auditable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2), 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Power, M. (1999). The audit society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Power, M. (2011). Assurance worlds: Consumers, experts and independence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4–5), 324–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao, S. (2017, July). Current state of assurance on sustainability reports. CPA Journal, 52–57. Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, J. (2005). Agency theory, ethics and corporate governance. In C. R. Lehman (Ed.), Corporate governance: Does any sixe fit? Advances in public interest accounting (pp. 249–270). Amsterdan: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roberts, J., & Ng, W. (2012). Against economic (mis)conceptions of the individual: Constructing financial agency in the credit crisis. Culture and Organization, 18(2), 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossi, A., & Tarquinio, L. (2017). An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 578–602.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2016-1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: From the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 541–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. Accounting Review, 84(3), 937–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wallace, W. (1980). The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets. Open Educational Resources. 2. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/oer/2.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm Business School, Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations