Changing Financial Firms Relative to ESG Issues

  • John HollandEmail author


The aim of this chapter is to investigate change in financial firms relative to environmental, social and governance issues (ESG). An embryonic ‘behavioural theory of the financial firm’ (BTFF) is outlined to provide a conceptual framework to analyse ESG change issues in financial firms. This is used to explore how financial firms and others can understand processes of: learning, strategic design of the firm, mobilisation of resources, and reporting, relative to growing ESG concerns. It is also used to identify problems and barriers to change (historic, current, potential) in ESG areas and propose a coherent response. Climate change is used as a major ESG issue to discuss change. The chapter illustrates how ‘top teams’, advisory policy bodies, legislators, and regulators can use the BTFF to inform their actions and change proposals. This can support an integrated view of the financial firm and encourage a coherent pursuit of financial and ESG aims throughout the financial firm. Such actions should be adopted to improve firm decision-making, match the needs of stakeholders, improve reporting and hence improve legitimacy of the financial firm (DiMaggio and Powell 1991) with stakeholders (Guthrie and Parker 1990).


Financial firms Change Theory ESG Reporting 


  1. Antonacopoulou, E. (2006). The relationship between individual and organizational learning. Management Learning, 37, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chahal, H., & Bakshi, P. (2015). Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(3), 376–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, L., Danbolt, J., & Holland, J. (2014). Rethinking bank business models: The role of intangibles. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal, 27(3), 563–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, L., Danbolt, J., & Holland, J. (2016). Analyst information intermediation and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’. Presented at APIRA Melbourne.Google Scholar
  6. Chivers, G. (2011). Supporting informal learning by traders in investment banks. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(2), 154–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, L. (2015). Facing up to fund managers: An exploratory field study of how institutional investors make decisions. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 7(2), 111–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, T., & La Plante, A. (2016). Climate change: Why financial institutions should take note. Global Risk Institute: Toronto. Available at:
  9. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. DiMaggio, J., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–1107. Available at: Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for corporate social responsibility. Available at:
  13. European Commission. (2017a). Guidelines on disclosure of non-financial information. Brussels. Available at:
  14. European Commission. (2017b, July). Financing a sustainable European economy, interim report. By the high-level expert group on sustainable finance. Available at:
  15. FCA. (2015, July 7). Senior bank management held accountable in responsibility area. Available at:
  16. FSB. (2017). Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Basel: BIS. Available at:
  17. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green Bank Network. (2017). Available at:
  19. Group of Thirty (G30). (2015, July). Banking conduct and culture. Washington.Google Scholar
  20. Group of 300. (2017). Available at:
  21. Guthrie, J., & Parker L. (1990). Corporate social disclosure practice. Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 3, 159–173.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, L. (2002). The learning organisation—Myth or reality? The Learning Organisation, 9(2), 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holland, J. (1993). Bank-corporate relations—Change issues in the international enterprise. Accounting and Business Research, 23(91), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holland, J. (2005). A grounded theory of corporate disclosure. Accounting and Business Research, 35(3), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holland, J. (2010). Banks, knowledge and crisis: A case of knowledge and learning failure. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 18(2), 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland, J. (2016). A behavioural theory of the fund management firm. European Journal of Finance, 22(11), 1004–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Holland, J. (2017). The market for information. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 9(3), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holland, J. (2018). A new approach to research and theory development for financial firms. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (forthcoming). Google Scholar
  29. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The international integrated reporting framework. London, UK: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  30. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (2013). Sustainable banking. Available at:
  31. Larsen, M., & Tan, S. (2015, August). Applying the integrated reporting concept of ‘capitals’ in the banking industry. Published on behalf of Banking Network.Google Scholar
  32. Larsen, M. (2017, March). Innovation in banking—Are we communicating the value created? Published on behalf of <IR> Banking Network.Google Scholar
  33. Lyon, F., (2017), “Filling the finance gap for sustainable prosperity: The challenge for green entrepreneurial finance”, 16th FRAP and 2nd SSFII, 25th Sept 2017, Hughes Hall, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  34. Meritum. (2002). Guidelines for managing and reporting on intangibles (Intellectual capital report). Tucson, AZ.Google Scholar
  35. Pavoni, S. (2017, September 1). Will climate change cause the next financial crisis? The Banker.Google Scholar
  36. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1997). The learning company (2nd ed.). London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011, January–February). The big idea: Creating shared value, rethinking capitalism. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  38. Royal, C., & Rowley, C. (2012, May 22). Knowledge acquisition in investment banking. London: Cass Business School, City University.Google Scholar
  39. Shih, K., Chang, C., & Lin, B. (2010). Assessing knowledge creation and intellectual capital in banking industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 11(1), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sims, D., Dougherty, S., & Bergöö, B. (2017). NRDC, national development banks and green investment banks. Available at:
  41. Smallridge, D., et al. (2013). The role of national development banks in catalyzing international climate finance. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
  42. Trang, D. (2016). Has bank culture changed to ensure ethical behavior? Seven Pillars Institute. Available at:
  43. UK GIB. (2016). UK Green Investment Bank plc, annual report and accounts, 2015–16. Available at:
  44. UNEP. (2016). Greening the banking system—Taking stock of G20 green banking market practice. Available at:

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Adam Smith Business SchoolUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations