Advertisement

Integrated Reporting and Integrating Thinking: Practical Challenges

  • Matteo La TorreEmail author
  • Cristiana Bernardi
  • James Guthrie
  • John Dumay
Chapter

Abstract

Integrated reporting (<IR>) is currently a hot topic for academic research because of the practical challenges businesses encounter when implementing it. Motivated by the results from the IIRC’s call for feedback on the International <IR> Framework (<IRF>) implementation, this chapter focuses on the challenges of integrated thinking and examines the extant academic literature to offer contributions for future research based on <IR> practice. We find that integrated thinking suffers from significant conceptual, theoretical and practical challenges, which obstruct the claimed benefits deriving from the adoption of <IR>. Therefore, this chapter contributes to rethinking the paradigm of integrated thinking as an internal managerial practice, and calls for pragmatic research investigating <IR> internal practices and integrated thinking. Within third-stage <IR> research, that provides a critical and performative assessment of <IR> in action, we advocate that researchers need to shift the focus from reporting to internal practices. Accordingly, we claim that managers need to abandon the compliance-driven logic underpinning external reporting to foster integrated thinking and unlock its potential in practice.

Keywords

Integrated reporting Integrated thinking International <IR> Framework International Integrated Reporting Council 

References

  1. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007). Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballou, B., Casey, R. J., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. (2012). Exploring the strategic integration of sustainability initiatives: Opportunities for accounting research. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black Sun. (2012). Understanding transformation: Building the business case for integrated reporting. London, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Blackiston, H. (2017). Understanding the role of the worker bee in a hive. Available at: http://www.dummies.com/home-garden/hobby-farming/beekeeping/understanding-the-role-of-the-worker-bee-in-a-hive/. Accessed 14 Dec 2017.
  5. Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2015). Exploring how the balanced scorecard engages and unfolds: Articulating the visual power of accounting inscriptions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(3), 1236–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Busco, C., & Quattrone, P. (2018). In search of the ‘perfect one’: How accounting as a maieutic machine sustains inventions through generative ‘in-tensions’. Management Accounting Research, 39, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaidali, P., & Jones, M. J. (2017). It’s a matter of trust: Exploring the perceptions of integrated reporting preparers. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 48, 1–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, D. J., Ezzamel, M., & Qu, S. Q. (2017). Popularizing a management accounting idea: The case of the balanced scorecard. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 991–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Villiers, C., Hsiao, P. K., & Maroun, W. (2017a). Developing a conceptual model of influences around integrated reporting, new insights and directions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 450–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Villiers, C., Venter, E. R., & Hsiao, P.-C. K. (2017b). Integrated reporting: Background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and the sustainability of competitive advantage: Reply. Management Science, 35(12), 1504–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dumay, J. C. (2009). Intellectual capital measurement: A critical approach. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 10(2), 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dumay, J. (2013). The third stage of IC: Towards a new IC future and beyond. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dumay, J. (2016). A critical reflection on the future of intellectual capital: From reporting to disclosure. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(1), 168–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumay, J., & Dai, T. (2017). Integrated thinking as a cultural control? Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 574–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dumay, J., & Garanina, T. (2013). Intellectual capital research: A critical examination of the third stage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 14(1), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J., & La Torre, M. (2017). Barriers to implementing the international integrated reporting framework. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Feng, T., Cummings, L., & Tweedie, D. (2017). Exploring integrated thinking in integrated reporting—An exploratory study in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(2), 330–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flower, J. (2015, March). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guthrie, J., Manes-Rossi, F., & Orelli, R. L. (2017). Integrated reporting and integrated thinking in italian public sector organisations. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 553–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012). Reflections and projections: A decade of intellectual capital accounting research. The British Accounting Review, 44(2), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA). (2009). King code of governance principles for South Africa. Johannesburg: IoDSA.Google Scholar
  25. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa (IoDSA). (2016). King IV: Report on corporate governance for South Africa. Johannesburg: IoDSA.Google Scholar
  26. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The international integrated reporting framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.Google Scholar
  27. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2016). Creating value: The cyclical power of integrated thinking and reporting. London, UK.Google Scholar
  28. International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2017). International <IR> Framework implementation feedback. London, UK.Google Scholar
  29. La Torre, M., Valentinetti, D., Dumay, J., & Rea, M. A. (2018). Improving corporate disclosure through XBRL: An evidence-based taxonomy structure for Integrated Reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 338–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lev, B., & Gu, F. (2016). The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lodhia, S. (2015). Exploring the transition to integrated reporting through a practice lens: An Australian customer owned bank perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 585–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maniora, J. (2017). Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(4), 755–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McNally, M.-A., Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2017). Exploring the challenges of preparing an integrated report. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oliver, J., Vesty, G., & Brooks, A. (2016). Conceptualising integrated thinking in practice. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(2), 228–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of growth of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Petty, R., & Guthrie, J. (2000). Intellectual capital literature review. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(2), 155–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pike, S., Fernström, L., & Roos, G. (2005). Intellectual capital: Management approach in ICS Ltd. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(4), 489–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reuter, M., & Messner, M. (2015). Lobbying on the integrated reporting framework. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(3), 365–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaper, S., Nielsen, C., & Roslender, R. (2017). Moving from irrelevant intellectual capital (IC) reporting to value-relevant IC disclosures. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schatzki, T. R. (2005). Peripheral vision: The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Steyn, M. (2014). Organisational benefits and implementation challenges of mandatory integrated reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 5(4), 476–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2018). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the role of regulatory reform in integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(3), 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Velte, P., & Stawinoga, M. (2017). Integrated reporting: The current state of empirical research, limitations and future research implications. Journal of Management Control, 28(3), 275–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Intellectual Capital Initiative (WICI). (2013). Connectivity—Background paper for IR. London, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo La Torre
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cristiana Bernardi
    • 2
  • James Guthrie
    • 3
  • John Dumay
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economic Studies, University “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly
  2. 2.Lecturer in Accounting, Department for Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Business and Law, The Open University Business SchoolMilton KeynesUK
  3. 3.Department of Accounting and Corporate Governance, Faculty of Business and EconomicsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations