Advertisement

Perspectives on Corporate Taxation from a Sustainable Business Perspective

  • Roger Persson ÖstermanEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

CSR and taxpaying are currently a hot topic for academic research. The issue is about securing a sustainable business environment in terms of corporate taxation. A sustainable tax system must be seen from both a collective view and an individual view. The chapter focuses on the individual view. The chapter emphasizes the need for a legal rule-based taxation. The legal order based on the rule of tax law is the only system that in practical terms is able to secure very important functional outcomes. A great problem is that the rule of tax law is the facilitator of tax avoidance and aggressive tax planning. However, CSR and tax morale are important in terms of taxpayer behavior. The most important lesson the social science research provides should be that the willingness to pay taxes is a function of complicated processes and that there is no single explanation as to why an individual or a corporation choose to pay their taxes or to engage or not engage in tax planning or tax avoidance. Research also indicates that the social norm is not very clear in terms of the view on tax avoidance. Ethical norms cannot be described as very clear, either. A very problematic issue is that neither “tax avoidance” nor “fair share” is defined in a way that enables a benchmarking. Evidence implies that a corporate tax strategy is about cost/benefit where “reputational risk” sometimes plays a role. An opportunity is to enhance the use of soft law: the published corporate tax strategies and tax policies. A very brief analysis of a few published tax strategies imply that there is a great potential in that respect. At present, they do not seem to work well as normative instruments. The best way of securing a sustainable corporate taxation is international cooperation on the legislative level and the development of legal concepts against tax avoidance (General Anti Avoidance Rules).

Keywords

CSR Sustainable corporate taxation Rule of law Rule of tax law Procedural justice Tax avoidance Aggressive tax planning Tax morale Taxpayer behavior Tax ethics Tax strategies Tax policies 

References

Litterature

  1. Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 328–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alm, J., & MacClellan, C. (2012). Tax morale and tax compliance from the firm’s perspective. Kyklos, 65, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. (2012). The ethics of taxation. Philosophy Now (Vol. 90), pp. 26–28.Google Scholar
  4. Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in taxation and governance—Resisting and dismissing authority in a democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  6. Cormacain, R. (2017). Legislation, legislative drafting and the rule of law. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 5, 115–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, A. K., Guenther, D. A., Krull, L. K., & Williams, B. M. (2016). Do socially responsible firms pay more taxes? The Accounting Review, 91, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elbra, A., & Mikler, J. (2016). Paying a ‘fair share’: Multinational corporations’ perspectives on taxation. Global Policy, 8, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freedman, J. (2011). Responsive regulation, risk, and rules: Applying the theory to tax practice. UBC Law Review, 44, 625–662.Google Scholar
  10. Freedman, J., Loomer, G. T., & Vella, J. (2009). Corporate tax risk and tax avoidance: New approaches. British Tax Review, 1, 74–116.Google Scholar
  11. Freedman, J., Ng, F., & Vella, J. (2014). HMRC’s relationship with business (Draft report Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation no. 19).Google Scholar
  12. Hilling, A., & Ostas, D. T. (2017). Corporate taxation and social responsibility. Stockholm: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Hultqvist, A. (1995). Legalitetsprincipen vid inkomstbeskattningen. Stockholm: Juristförlaget. Google Scholar
  14. Jallai, A.-G., & Gribnau, H. (2018). Aggressive tax planning and corporate social irresponsibility: Managerial discretion in the light of corporate governance (Tilburg Law School Research Paper No. 5).Google Scholar
  15. Kasper, M., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Stark, J., & Kirchler, E. (2018). Individual attitudes and social representations of taxation, tax avoidance and tax evasion. In N. Hashimzade & Y. Epifantseva (Eds.), The Routledge companion to tax avoidance research (pp. 289–303). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kleven, H. J., Knudsen, M. B., Kreiner, C. T., Pedersen, S., & Saez, E. (2011). Unwilling or unable to cheat? Evidence from a tax audit experiment in Denmark. Econometrica, 79, 651–692.Google Scholar
  17. Knuutinen, R. (2014). Corporate social responsibility, taxation and aggressive tax planning. Nordic Tax Journal, 2014, 36–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krever, R. (2016). General report: GAARs. In GAARs—A key element of tax systems in the post-BEPS world, IBFD.Google Scholar
  19. Lago, I., & Lago-Penas, S. (2010). The determinants of tax morale in comparative perspective: Evidence from European Countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lederman, L. (2003). The interplay between norms and enforcement in tax compliance. Ohio State Law Journal, 64, 1453–1514.Google Scholar
  21. MacCormick, N. (2005). Rethoric and the rule of law: A theory of legal reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  22. MacCormick, N. (2011). Civil liberties and the law. In Legal right and the social democracy—Essays in legal and political philosophy (Reprinted). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  23. Olaf Weber, T., Fooken, J., & Herrmann, B. (2014). Behavioural economics and taxation (European Commission Taxation Papers no. 41).Google Scholar
  24. Posner, E. A. (2000). Law and social norms: The case of tax compliance. Virginia Law Review, 86, 1781–1820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Prebble, R., & Prebble, J. (2017). General anti-avoidance rules and the rule of law. In N. Hashimzade & Y. Epifantseva (Eds.), The Routledge companion to tax avoidance research (pp. 61–78). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Sandmo, A. (2005). The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. National Tax Journal, 58, 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Skar, H. (2017). Den ulovfestede omgåelsesnormen i skatteretten. En analyse av rettsanvendelsesprosessen i omgåelsessaker. Norway: University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  28. Spaak, T. (2014). A critical appraisal of Karl Olivecrona’s legal philosophy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Svernlöv, C., & Person Österman, R. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and corporate taxation. Stockholm: The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise.Google Scholar
  30. Torgler, B., Schaffner, M., & Macintyre, A. (2007). Tax compliance, tax morale and governance quality (No. 225 School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers School of Economics and Finance Queensland University of Technology).Google Scholar
  31. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tyler, T. R. (2013). Why people cooperate—The role of social motivations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Weale, A. (2013). Democratic justice and the social contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wennerströmm, E. O. (2009). Measuring the rule of law. In Rule of law promotion: Global perspectives, local applications, Skrifter från juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet nr 21.Google Scholar
  35. Ziegert, K. A. (2009). Is the rule of law portable? A socio-legal journey from the Nordic Mediterranean Sea via the Silk Road to China. In Rule of law promotion: Global perspectives, local applications, Skrifter från juridiska institutionen vid Umeå universitet nr 21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations