Skip to main content

Using SSM in Project Management: Aligning Objectives and Outcomes in Organizational Change Projects

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects

Abstract

This paper aims to contribute to the use of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) in project management, by exploring what happens in real-world organizational change projects when stakeholders seem to agree to a set of initial-objectives and final-outcomes of the project. SSM Analyses are then used to explore the misalignments between initial-objectives and final-outcomes along the project life cycle. Initial results suggest that SSM helps to ‘shadow’ these misalignments when structuring an unclear complex situation such as organizational change projects and that the application of SSM facilitates negotiations, generates debate, understanding, and learning. This leads to meaningful collaboration among stakeholders and enables key changes to be introduced reflecting on the potential misalignments. Results also support SSM analysis of changes in role, norms, or value adversely influencing project outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Wilderom, C., & Peterson, M. F. (2011). The Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). Rich Pictures: A Means to Explore the ‘Sustainable Mind’? Sustainable Development, 21, 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, T. K., et al. (1998). Identification of the Second Heparin-Binding Domain in Human Complement Factor H. The Journal of Immunology, 160, 3342–3348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, I. (1989). The Bounding of a Problem Situation and the Concept of a Systems Boundary in Soft Systems Methodology. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice: A 30-year Retrospective. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (2000). Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 17(S1), S11–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and Its Use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Winter, M. (2006). Process and Content: Two Ways of Using SSM. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 1435–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feather, J., & Sturges, P. (2003). International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Furnell, S. (2008). Securing Information and Communications Systems Principles, Technologies, and Applications. Boston: Artech House. http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=456881

  • Hanafizadeh, P., & Mehrabioun, M. (2017). Application of SSM in Tackling Problematical Situations from Academicians’ Viewpoints. Systems Practice and Action Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-017-9422-y.

  • Ho, K. K. J., & Sculli, D. (1994). Organization Theory and Soft Systems Methodologies. Journal of Management Development, 13(7), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/02621719410063413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huaxia, Z. (2010). Soft Systems Methodology and ‘Soft’ Philosophy of Science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27, 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, K. (1991). Critical Systems Thinking and information Technology: Some Summary Reflections, Doubts, and Hopes Through Critical Thinking Critically Considered, and Through Hypersystems. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 18, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2001). Critical Systems Thinking and Practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenett, R. S., & Baker, E. (2010). Process Improvement and CMMI® for Systems and Software. Florida: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, T., Puustinen, S., Salonen, V., & Mutikainen, P. (2002). Resistance and Tolerance in a Host Plant–Holoparasitic Plant Interaction: Genetic Variation and Costs. Evolution, 56, 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotiadis, K., & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. C., & Oliva, R. (1998). The Greater Whole: Towards a Synthesis of System Dynamics and Soft Systems Methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 107(1), 214–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. (1994). Information-Systems Development. London: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Brocklesby, J. (1997). Multimethodology: Towards a Framework for Mixing Methodologies. OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science, 25, 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & White, L. (2010). A Review of the Recent Contribution of Systems Thinking to Operational Research and Management Science. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moores, T. T. (2000). Cultural Problems in Applying SSM for IS Development. Journal of Global Information Management, 8(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, R. (2006). The History and Ideas of Pragmatism. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(8), 892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pala, O., Vennix, J. A. M., & van Mullekom, T. (2003). Validity in SSM: Neglected Areas. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(7), 706–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (1996). Conflicting Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualising Their Use in the Field of Organizational Change. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 691–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paucar-Caceres, A., & Rodriguez-Ulloa, R. (2007). An Application of Soft Systems Dynamics Methodology (SSDM). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(6), 701–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pidd, M. (2007). Making Sure You Tackle the Right Problem: Linking Hard and Soft Methods in Simulation Practice. In Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference (Vols. 1–5, pp. 183–192).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, R., Acharia, S., & Baveja, A. (2009). Soft-System Knowledge Management Framework for New Product Development. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(1), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvius, A. J. G., Schipper, R., & Nedeski, S. (2012). Sustainability in Project Management: Reality Bites. In 26th IPMA World Congress, Crete (pp. 1053–1061).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajino, A., & Smith, C. (2005). Exploratory Practice and Soft Systems Methodology. Language Teaching Research, 9(4), 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, G. (2002). A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978–2001) (Rutcor Res. Report, RRR, 01-02).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidgen, R., Wood-Harper, T., & Wood, R. (1993). A Soft Systems Approach to Information Systems Quality. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 5, 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. (1990). Systems: Concepts, Methodologies and Applications. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. (2006). Problem Structuring in Project Management: An Application of Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 808–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M. C., & Checkland, P. (2003). Soft Systems: A Fresh Perspective for Project Management. Proceedings of the ICE – Civil Engineering, 156(4), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1680/cien.2003.156.4.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, K. T. (1993). Systems Thinking and Project Management-Time to Reunite. International Journal of Project Management, 11(1), 111–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lee Sarnoe or Rosane Pagano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sarnoe, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., Pagano, R., Castellini, M. (2019). Using SSM in Project Management: Aligning Objectives and Outcomes in Organizational Change Projects. In: Bell, G., Pagano, R., Warwick, J., Sato, C. (eds) Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93263-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics