Skip to main content

Systemic Approach and Problem Structuring Methods in Teaching Sustainability in Project Management Courses at Manchester Metropolitan University: Some Reflections on Good Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects

Abstract

This chapter outlines the theoretical underpinnings of two management practice paradigms: reductionism and systems thinking in the context of the development of postgraduate and undergraduate education, specifically to teach sustainability in project management courses. The development of the ‘Hard’ and ‘Soft’ systems traditions are discussed as a prelude to considering teaching practice in this subject area. We argue that to have a better understanding of the complexity of sustainability in project management, a systemic view is necessary in designing the appropriate teaching. The paper reports on some of the principal themes employed in Postgraduate and Undergraduate Project Management courses at a large metropolitan university’s business school. These themes are presented to allow reflection on the teaching content of these courses for academics and practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abuabara, L., Paucar-Caceres, A., Neyra Belderrain, M. C., & Burrowes-Cromwell, T. (2017). Combining Soft OR Approaches to Support the Re-designing of a Teamwork Strategy: An Aviation Manufacturer Brazilian Company Case. Journal Operational Research Society, 69, 220–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. (1993). The Art and Science of Mess Management. In C. Mabey & B. Mayon-White (Eds.), Managing Change. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1981, 1999). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Miller, S. (2014). Using Systems Thinking to Educate for Sustainability in a Business School. Systems, 2, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems2030313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1982). The Nature of Soft Systems Thinking: The Work of Churchman, Ackoff and Checkland. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 9, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Holism for Managers. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotiadis, K., & Mingers, J. (2006). Combining PSMs with Hard OR Methods: The Philosophical and Practical Challenges. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57, 856–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1997a). Multi-Paradigm Multimethodology: Towards Theory and Practice and Mixing and Matching Methodologies. In J. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1997b). Towards Critical Pluralism. In Mingers & Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • OCP. (1995). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (T. Honderich, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/users/diederic/downloads/Oxford.pdf

  • Paucar-Caceres, A., Hart, D., Roma i Vergés, J., & Sierra-Lozano, D. (2015). Applying Soft Systems Methodology to the Practice of Managing Family Businesses in Catalonia. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 33, 312–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (Ed.). (1989). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J. (2006). Past, Present and Future of Problem Structuring Methods. Journal of Operational Research Society, 57, 759–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (Eds.). (2001). Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited (2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1st ed.). New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1955, February). A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garry Blair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blair, G., Paucar-Caceres, A. (2019). Systemic Approach and Problem Structuring Methods in Teaching Sustainability in Project Management Courses at Manchester Metropolitan University: Some Reflections on Good Practice. In: Bell, G., Pagano, R., Warwick, J., Sato, C. (eds) Problem Structuring Approaches for the Management of Projects. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93263-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics