Skip to main content

Curriculum Guidelines for Teaching Healthcare Ethics at Undergraduate Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 13))

Abstract

Undergraduate courses in healthcare ethics should primarily focus on taking students on a journey that facilitates growth in the theoretical and practical areas of deliberation and ethical decision-making skills. A sound knowledge of the most prominent moral theories, together with knowledge of widely-recognised bioethics principles and medical law principles should underpin the course content. Ultimately healthcare ethics courses should result in skills that will empower students to effectively function in their specific professional healthcare fraternities. The first section of this chapter describes the rationale for the inclusion of four broad learning units. Each of these learning units will be subdivided into one or more modules. The Ethics principles learning unit includes the following modules: (1) Overview of ethics; (2) Moral theories; (3) Fundamental ethics principles; and (4) Clinical research ethics. The Ethical reasoning learning unit consists of only one module, while the Professional skills learning unit includes the following two modules: (1) Professionalism; and (2) Communication. The Legal considerations in healthcare learning unit consists only of a Medical law module. The second section of this chapter focuses on a description of each module’s specific learning outcomes. The aim of these learning outcomes is to ensure that healthcare students acquire knowledge, skills and attitudes that achieve deep learning and fundamental understanding of ethical principles, ethical reasoning, professional skills and medical law principles. The third section of this chapter focuses on a description of the assessment tasks that can be used in dynamic interaction with theory and practice throughout the undergraduate healthcare ethics course. The various assessment tasks focus on evidence-based endeavours to determine and establish the extent to which students have internalised the required sets of knowledge, skills and attitudes regarding ethics concepts and principles, ethical reasoning, professional skills and legal considerations in healthcare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, R.M., and L. Forrow. 2004. Bioethics education, medicine. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, ed. S.G. Post, 3rd ed., 292–299. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASBH. 2009. ASBH Task Force on Ethics and Humanities Education in Undergraduate Medical Programs. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barilan, Y.M., and M. Brusa. 2015. Bioethics: Education. In Encyclopedia of global bioethics, ed. A.M.J. Ten Have. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, J. 2017. University research ethics clearances: Safety nets, or a false sense of legal immunity? South African Journal of Higher Education 31 (3): 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bree, M. 2015. Education: Goals. In Encyclopedia of global bioethics, ed. A.M.J. Ten Have. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekberg, M.E. 2016. Exploring the design, delivery, and content of a ‘Bioethics for Biosciences’ module: An empirical study. Journal of Academic Ethics 14: 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E.J., D. Wendler, J. Killen, and C. Grady. 2004. What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmark of ethical research. Journal of Infectious Diseases 189: 930–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, W.A., and N. Nortjé. 2016. Education: Assessment. In Encyclopedia of global bioethics, ed. A.M.J. Ten Have, 1012–1031. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, E.G. 2017. Fourteen important concepts regarding moral distress. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 28 (1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • HPCSA. 2006. Proposed core curriculum on human rights, ethics and medical law for health care practitioners. Pretoria: Health Professions Council of South Africa. Retrieved on February 10, 2014 from http://www.hpcsa.co.za/downloads/radiography/core_curriculum_on_human_rights_ethics_and_medical_law.pdf.

  • Knox, J.B.L. 2017. Ethical competence training for members on Clinical Ethics Committees (CEC): Experiences from Denmark. International Journal of Ethics Education. 2: 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-017-0040-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A.G., H.A. Beaver, H.C. Boldt, R. Olson, T.A. Oetting, M. Abramoff, and K. Carter. 2007. Teaching and assessing professionalism in ophthalmology residency training programs. Survey of Ophthalmology 52 (3): 300–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Letseka, M.M., and W. Ganya. 2017. African philosophy and medical ethics. In Medical ethics, law and human rights: A South African perspective, ed. K. Moodley, 2nd ed., 41–51. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros, K.E., L.L. Watts, T.J. Mulhearn, L.M. Steele, M.D. Mumford, and S. Connely. 2017. What is working, what is not, and what we need to know: A meta-analytic review of business ethics instruction. Journal of Academic Ethics 15: 245–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodley, K. 2007. Teaching medical ethics to undergraduate students in post-apartheid South Africa, 2003–2006. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Research ethics and scientific integrity. In Medical ethics, law and human rights: A South African perspective, ed. K. Moodley, 2nd ed., 327–348. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndebele, P. 2016. Codes of ethics. In Encyclopedia of global bioethics, ed. A.M.J. Ten Have. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nortjé, N., and W.A. Hoffmann. 2016. Seven year overview (2007–2013) of ethical transgressions by registered health care professionals in South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid 21: 46–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J.A. 2017. Law and the health professional in South Africa. In Medical ethics, law and human rights: A South African perspective, ed. K. Moodley, 2nd ed., 129–165. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, H.A.M.J., and M.S. Jean. 2009. The UNESCO universal declaration on bioethics and human rights: Background, principles and application. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. 2008. Bioethics core curriculum, section 1: Syllabus ethics education programme, 68. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Niekerk, A. 2017. Ethics and philosophy; ethics theories and the principlist approach in bioethics. In Medical ethics, law and human rights: A South African perspective, ed. K. Moodley, 2nd ed., 7–40. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • African Union. 2017. Judicial and human rights institutions. Retrieved from https://au.int/organs/cj.

  • European Science Foundation & ALLEA. 2011. The European code of conduct for research integrity, 22. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J., and S. Rachels. 2014. The elements of moral philosophy. 8th ed, 224. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willem A. Hoffmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoffmann, W.A., Nortjé, N. (2018). Curriculum Guidelines for Teaching Healthcare Ethics at Undergraduate Level. In: Nortjé, N., De Jongh, JC., Hoffmann, W. (eds) African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics