Abstract
Diagnostic radiography or medical imaging is a discipline where a broad range of high-technology equipment is used for medical diagnosis in order to guide patient management. The role of the radiographer requires the integration of knowledge, complex technology and advanced technical skills within an environment where effective and caring interaction is needed with patients. The patient engagement tends to be a relatively short, singular event and can be considered as a complex temporary encounter. There is also the need to interact with other healthcare practitioners to facilitate the provision of quality health care and service through a multi-disciplinary team approach. The rapid evolution in medical imaging requires the radiographer to continuously adjust to new emerging technologies and techniques that make continuous professional education essential. Ethical practice in radiography therefore involves a complex interlinking of good clinical decision making, safe and accurate practice, a commitment to empathetic patient relationships, the ability to function effectively within the multi-disciplinary team and honouring of the principles of lifelong learning. A unique aspect of ethical practice in radiography is radiation protection that is underpinned by respect for the principles of justification and optimisation. Radiographers must therefore pay attention to image quality while considering radiation safety for each patient but must also be aware of ionising radiation as a public health issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barron, B.J., and E.E. Kim. 2003. Ethical dilemmas in today’s nuclear medicine and radiology practice. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 44(11): 1818–1826.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beyer, L., and P. Diedericks. 2010. The attitude of radiographers towards patients in government hospitals in Bloemfontein. South African Radiographer 48 (2): 22–27.
Do, K.-H. 2016. General principles of radiation protection in fields of diagnostic medical exposure. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: S6–S9.
Doudenkova, V., and J.-C.B. Pipon. 2016. Duty to inform and informed consent in diagnostic radiology: How ethics and law can better guide practice. HEC Forum 28: 75–94.
Du Plessis, J., and R. Pitcher. 2015. Towards task shifting? A comparison of the accuracy of acute trauma-radiograph reporting by medical officers and senior radiographers in an African hospital. Pan African Medical Journal 21: 308.
HPCSA (Health Professions Council of South Africa). 2008a. General guidelines for doctors, dentists and medical scientists, booklet 1. Pretoria: HPCSA.
———. 2008b. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions: Confidentiality: Protecting and providing information, booklet 10. Pretoria: HPCSA.
———. 2008c. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions. Ethical and professional rules of the Health Professions Council of South Africa as promulgated in Government Gazette R717/2006, booklet 2. Pretoria: HPCSA.
———. 2008d. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions. National patients’ rights charter, booklet 3. Pretoria: HPCSA.
ICRP. 2004. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP publication 93. Annals 34 (1): 1–73.
———. 2007. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Jonas, H. 1984. The imperative responsibility. In Search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kabongo, J.M., S. Nel, and R.D. Pitcher. 2015. Analysis of licensed South African diagnostic imaging equipment. Pan African Medical Journal 22 (57): 1–9.
Makanjee, C.R., A.-M. Bergh, and W.A. Hoffmann. 2014a. “So you are running between” – A qualitative study of nurses’ involvement with diagnostic imaging in South Africa. Journal of Radiology Nursing 33 (3): 105–116.
———. 2014b. A model for understanding diagnostic imaging referrals and complex interaction processes within the bigger picture of a healthcare system. Radiography 20 (2): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.01.005.
———. 2015a. Patients’ journeys through multi-level diagnostic imaging referrals. The South African Radiographer 53 (1): 11–16.
———. 2015b. Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on diagnostic imaging investigations. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine 7 (1): 1–10.
———. 2015c. Multiprovider and patient perspectives on conveying diagnostic imaging investigation results in a South African public health care system. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.02.003.
Malone, J., and F. Zölzer. 2016. Pragmatic ethical basis for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. The British Journal of Radiology 89 (1059): 20150713. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150713.
Mung’omba, B., and A.D.H. Botha. 2012. Factors influencing patients’ demand for x-ray examinations in rural KwaZulu-Natal. South African Radiographer 50 (2): 17–22.
Nkwanyana, T.S. 2017. The socio-political and medico legal and socio political practice of medicine in South Africa post 1994. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60078.
Papp, J. 2014. Quality management in the imaging sciences. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier.
Peer, F. 2003. What do we understand by the professional code of conduct for radiographers? South African Radiographer 41 (1): 5–6.
Robey, T.E., K. Edwards, and M.K. Murphy. 2014. Barriers to computed tomography radiation risk communication in the emergency department: A qualitative analysis of patient and physician perspectives. Academic Emergency Medicine 21: 122–129.
RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2010. Code of practice for users of medical x-ray equipment. Pretoria: Department of Health, Directorate: Radiation Control.
United Nations. 2001. Hereditary effects of radiation United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2001 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annex. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2001/UNSCEAR_2001_Report.pdf.
Van Schouwenburg, F., C. Ackermann, and R. Pitcher. 2014. An audit of elective outpatient magnetic resonance imaging in a tertiary South African public-sector hospital. South African Journal of Radiology 18 (1): 1–5.
Further Reading
Barron, B.J., and E. Kim. 2003. Ethical Dilemmas in today’s nuclear medicine and radiology practice. Journal Nuclear Medicine 44: 1818–1826.
Do, K-H. 2016. General principles of radiation protection in fields of diagnostic medical exposure. Journal of Korean Med Science 31: S6–S9.
Lam, D., I. Egan, and M. Baird. 2004. The radiographer’s impact on improving clinical decision-making, patient care and patient diagnosis: A pilot study. The Radiographer 51 (3): 133–137.
Matilainen, K., S.-M. Ahonen, P. Kankkunen, and M. Kangasniemi. 2017. Radiographers’ perceptions of their professional rights in diagnostic radiography: A qualitative interview study. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Science 31: 139–145.
Sibanda, L., P. Engel-Hills, and E. Hering. 2017. Radiology demand and capacity: A stochastic analysis based on care pathways. Cogent Business & Management 4.
Snaith, B.A., and A. Lancaster. 2008. Clinical history and physical examination skills – A requirement for radiographers? Radiography 14 (2): 150–153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makanjee, C.R., Engel-Hills, P. (2018). Ethics in Diagnostic Radiography in South Africa: A Complex Temporary Encounter Mediated Through Text and Technology. In: Nortjé, N., De Jongh, JC., Hoffmann, W. (eds) African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93229-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93230-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)