Skip to main content

Ethics in Diagnostic Radiography in South Africa: A Complex Temporary Encounter Mediated Through Text and Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals

Part of the book series: Advancing Global Bioethics ((AGBIO,volume 13))

Abstract

Diagnostic radiography or medical imaging is a discipline where a broad range of high-technology equipment is used for medical diagnosis in order to guide patient management. The role of the radiographer requires the integration of knowledge, complex technology and advanced technical skills within an environment where effective and caring interaction is needed with patients. The patient engagement tends to be a relatively short, singular event and can be considered as a complex temporary encounter. There is also the need to interact with other healthcare practitioners to facilitate the provision of quality health care and service through a multi-disciplinary team approach. The rapid evolution in medical imaging requires the radiographer to continuously adjust to new emerging technologies and techniques that make continuous professional education essential. Ethical practice in radiography therefore involves a complex interlinking of good clinical decision making, safe and accurate practice, a commitment to empathetic patient relationships, the ability to function effectively within the multi-disciplinary team and honouring of the principles of lifelong learning. A unique aspect of ethical practice in radiography is radiation protection that is underpinned by respect for the principles of justification and optimisation. Radiographers must therefore pay attention to image quality while considering radiation safety for each patient but must also be aware of ionising radiation as a public health issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barron, B.J., and E.E. Kim. 2003. Ethical dilemmas in today’s nuclear medicine and radiology practice. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 44(11): 1818–1826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, L., and P. Diedericks. 2010. The attitude of radiographers towards patients in government hospitals in Bloemfontein. South African Radiographer 48 (2): 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, K.-H. 2016. General principles of radiation protection in fields of diagnostic medical exposure. Journal of Korean Medical Science 31: S6–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doudenkova, V., and J.-C.B. Pipon. 2016. Duty to inform and informed consent in diagnostic radiology: How ethics and law can better guide practice. HEC Forum 28: 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, J., and R. Pitcher. 2015. Towards task shifting? A comparison of the accuracy of acute trauma-radiograph reporting by medical officers and senior radiographers in an African hospital. Pan African Medical Journal 21: 308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HPCSA (Health Professions Council of South Africa). 2008a. General guidelines for doctors, dentists and medical scientists, booklet 1. Pretoria: HPCSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008b. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions: Confidentiality: Protecting and providing information, booklet 10. Pretoria: HPCSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008c. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions. Ethical and professional rules of the Health Professions Council of South Africa as promulgated in Government Gazette R717/2006, booklet 2. Pretoria: HPCSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008d. Guidelines for good practice in the health care professions. National patients’ rights charter, booklet 3. Pretoria: HPCSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRP. 2004. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. ICRP publication 93. Annals 34 (1): 1–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, H. 1984. The imperative responsibility. In Search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabongo, J.M., S. Nel, and R.D. Pitcher. 2015. Analysis of licensed South African diagnostic imaging equipment. Pan African Medical Journal 22 (57): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makanjee, C.R., A.-M. Bergh, and W.A. Hoffmann. 2014a. “So you are running between” – A qualitative study of nurses’ involvement with diagnostic imaging in South Africa. Journal of Radiology Nursing 33 (3): 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014b. A model for understanding diagnostic imaging referrals and complex interaction processes within the bigger picture of a healthcare system. Radiography 20 (2): 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015a. Patients’ journeys through multi-level diagnostic imaging referrals. The South African Radiographer 53 (1): 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Healthcare provider and patient perspectives on diagnostic imaging investigations. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine 7 (1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015c. Multiprovider and patient perspectives on conveying diagnostic imaging investigation results in a South African public health care system. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2015.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, J., and F. Zölzer. 2016. Pragmatic ethical basis for radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. The British Journal of Radiology 89 (1059): 20150713. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mung’omba, B., and A.D.H. Botha. 2012. Factors influencing patients’ demand for x-ray examinations in rural KwaZulu-Natal. South African Radiographer 50 (2): 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkwanyana, T.S. 2017. The socio-political and medico legal and socio political practice of medicine in South Africa post 1994. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60078.

  • Papp, J. 2014. Quality management in the imaging sciences. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peer, F. 2003. What do we understand by the professional code of conduct for radiographers? South African Radiographer 41 (1): 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, T.E., K. Edwards, and M.K. Murphy. 2014. Barriers to computed tomography radiation risk communication in the emergency department: A qualitative analysis of patient and physician perspectives. Academic Emergency Medicine 21: 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RSA (Republic of South Africa). 2010. Code of practice for users of medical x-ray equipment. Pretoria: Department of Health, Directorate: Radiation Control.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 2001. Hereditary effects of radiation United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2001 Report to the General Assembly, with scientific annex. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from http://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2001/UNSCEAR_2001_Report.pdf.

  • Van Schouwenburg, F., C. Ackermann, and R. Pitcher. 2014. An audit of elective outpatient magnetic resonance imaging in a tertiary South African public-sector hospital. South African Journal of Radiology 18 (1): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Barron, B.J., and E. Kim. 2003. Ethical Dilemmas in today’s nuclear medicine and radiology practice. Journal Nuclear Medicine 44: 1818–1826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Do, K-H. 2016. General principles of radiation protection in fields of diagnostic medical exposure. Journal of Korean Med Science 31: S6–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D., I. Egan, and M. Baird. 2004. The radiographer’s impact on improving clinical decision-making, patient care and patient diagnosis: A pilot study. The Radiographer 51 (3): 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matilainen, K., S.-M. Ahonen, P. Kankkunen, and M. Kangasniemi. 2017. Radiographers’ perceptions of their professional rights in diagnostic radiography: A qualitative interview study. Scandanavian Journal of Caring Science 31: 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibanda, L., P. Engel-Hills, and E. Hering. 2017. Radiology demand and capacity: A stochastic analysis based on care pathways. Cogent Business & Management 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaith, B.A., and A. Lancaster. 2008. Clinical history and physical examination skills – A requirement for radiographers? Radiography 14 (2): 150–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandra R. Makanjee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Makanjee, C.R., Engel-Hills, P. (2018). Ethics in Diagnostic Radiography in South Africa: A Complex Temporary Encounter Mediated Through Text and Technology. In: Nortjé, N., De Jongh, JC., Hoffmann, W. (eds) African Perspectives on Ethics for Healthcare Professionals. Advancing Global Bioethics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93230-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics