Skip to main content

Kinematic Analysis of Planar Tensegrity 2-X Manipulators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Robot Kinematics 2018 (ARK 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics ((SPAR,volume 8))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper analyzes the kinematics of planar tensegrity manipulators made of two Snelson’s X-shape mechanisms in series. The variable instantaneous center of rotation of each mechanism renders the kinematic analysis of the resulting manipulator more challenging. A general formulation of the direct kinematics is set. A method is proposed to solve the inverse kinematic problem in a symbolic way and up to four inverse kinematic solutions are found. The singularities of the manipulator are shown to divide the joint space into two singularity-free components, showing for the first time a planar positioning manipulator that can be cuspidal. The workspace is determined and plotted for different values of the geometric parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fuller, R.B.: Tensile-integrity structures, United States Patent 3063521 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Skelton, R., de Oliveira, M.: Tensegrity Systems. Springer (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Motro, R.: Tensegrity systems: the state of the art. Int. J. Space Struct. 7(2), 75–83 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Levin, S.: The tensegrity-truss as a model for spinal mechanics: biotensegrity. J. Mech. Med. Biol. 2(3), 375–388 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arsenault, M., Gosselin, C.M.: Kinematic, static and dynamic analysis of a planar 2-dof tensegrity mechanism. Mech. Mach. Theory 41(9), 1072–1089 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Crane, C., et al.: Kinematic analysis of a planar tensegrity mechanism with pres-stressed springs. In: Lenarcic, J., Wenger, P. (eds.) Advances in Robot Kinematics: Analysis and Design, pp. 419-427. Springer (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wenger, P., Chablat, D.: Kinetostatic analysis and solution classification of a planar tensegrity mechanism. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Computational Kinematics, pp. 422-431. Springer (2017). ISBN 978-3-319-60867-9

    Google Scholar 

  8. Snelson, K.: Continuous Tension, Discontinuous Compression Structures, US Patent No. 3,169,611 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boehler, Q., et al.: Definition and computation of tensegrity mechanism workspace. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 7(4), 044502-1–044502-4 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aldrich, J.B., Skelton, R.E.: Time-energy optimal control of hyper-actuated mechanical systems with geometric path constraints. In: 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 8246-8253 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, S., Arsenault, M.: Analytical computation of the actuator and cartesian workspace boundaries for a planar 2-degree-of-freedom translational tensegrity mechanism. J. Mech. Robot. 4, 011010 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bakker, D.L., et al.: Design of an environmentally interactive continuum manipulator. In: Proceedings of the 14th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, IFToMM 2015, Taipei, Taiwan (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rouillier, F., et al.: Siropa Library V1, IDDN.FR.001.140015.000.S.P.2017.000.20600

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manubens, M., et al.: Cusp points in the parameter space of degenerate 3-RPR planar parallel manipulators. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 4(4), 041003–8 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moroz, G., et al.: On the determination of cusp points of 3-RPR parallel manipulators. Mech. Mach. Theory 45(11), 1555–1567 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Borrel, P., Liegeois, A.: A study of manipulator inverse geometric solutions with application to trajectory planning and workspace determination

    Google Scholar 

  17. El Omri, J., Wenger, P.: How to recognize simply a non-singular posture changing manipulator. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp. 215-222 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wenger, P.: Cuspidal and noncuspidal robot manipulators. Spec. Issue Robot. Geom. Robot. Sens. 25(6), 677–690 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was conducted with the support of the French National Research Agency (AVINECK Project ANR-16-CE33-0025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Wenger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Furet, M., Lettl, M., Wenger, P. (2019). Kinematic Analysis of Planar Tensegrity 2-X Manipulators. In: Lenarcic, J., Parenti-Castelli, V. (eds) Advances in Robot Kinematics 2018. ARK 2018. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93188-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics