Advertisement

The Discourse on Terrorism of Donald Trump

  • Valentina BartolucciEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Evolving American Presidency book series (EAP)

Abstracts

In this chapter, Valentina Bartolucci provides an examination of Donald Trump’s discourse on the subject of terrorism. Bartolucci identifies and deconstructs the series of tropes and rhetorical devices that this discourse is built upon, such as representing “radical Islamic terrorism” as an existential and civilizational threat that is animated by incomprehensible evil. Through this analysis, Bartolucci illuminates how Donald Trump’s discourse on terrorism promotes the intensification of state violence and overtly repositions the USA as a country to be feared and not admired.

References

  1. Appelbaum, Yoni. 2016. I Alone Can Fix it. The Atlantic’s, July 21.Google Scholar
  2. Azarian, Bobby. 2016. Research Suggests Anxiety Over Terrorism Helped Trump Win. Psychology Today, December 30.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, Marc. 2016. American Exceptionalism and the Construction of the War on Terror: An Analysis of Counterterrorism Policies Under Clinton, Bush and Obama. Working Paper Series. INSCT, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  4. Bartolucci, Valentina. 2010. Analysing Elite Discourse on Terrorism and Its Implications: The Case of Morocco. Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (1): 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2012. Terrorism Rhetoric Under the Bush Administration: Discourses and Effects. Journal of Language and Politics 11 (4): 562–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, Kira, Donna M. Goldstein, and Matthew Bruce Ingram. 2016. The Hands of Donald Trump: Entertainment, Gesture, Spectacle. Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (2): 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Keen, David. 2006. Endless War? Hidden Functions of the “War on Terror”. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Leeman, Richard W. 1991. The Rhetoric of Terrorism and Counterterrorism. Santa Barbara: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  10. PNAC. 1997. Statement of Principles. Project for the New American Century, June 3.Google Scholar
  11. Richardson, Louise. 2006. What Terrorists Want: Understanding the Terrorist Threat. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  12. Rogers, Paul. 2008. Why We Are Losing the War on Terror. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Said, Edward. 1994. Orientalism. New York: Ram House.Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, Stephanie. 2001. Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Research. In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, ed. Wetherell Margaret, Stephanie Taylor, and Simeon J. Yates, 5–48. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Discourse, Ideology and Context. Folia Linguistica 30 (1–2): 11–40.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2005. Racism and Discourse in Spain and Latin America. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. ———. 2006. Discourse and Manipulation. Discourse & Society 17 (2): 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vasile, Aurelia Ana. 2017. Positive and/or Negative Meaning as Style Traits and Strategy Throughout the 2016 American Presidential Campaign – Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Journal of Media Research 10 (1): 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Welnic, Ewa, and Jacel Fisiak, eds. 2008. Friendly Metaphors: Essays on Linguistics, Literature and Culture. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. Williams, Debbie Jay, and Kalyn L. Prince. 2018. The Monstrous Discourse in the Donald Trump Campaign: Implications for National Discourse. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Wodak, Ruth. 2009. Language and Politics. In English Language: Description, Variation and Context, ed. Jonathan Culpeper By, Francis Katamba, Paul Kerswill, Ruth Wodak, and Tony McEney, 576–593. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations