Abstract
In Sect. 1.1, we introduced the field of quantum transport theory and more specifically discussed the influence of quantum interference effects on transport phenomena. The present chapter, based on Walschaers et al. (2013, 2015), presents the first results of this dissertation, which fit into that framework.
Chaos isn’t a pit. Chaos is a ladder
Lord Petyr Baelish, played by Aidan Gillen in “Game of Thrones” (Sakharov 2013)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
We introduce the standard mathematics notation \(\lceil .\rceil \) for rounding up and \(\lfloor .\rfloor \) for rounding down. For example \(\lceil 1.1\rceil = 2\) and \(\lfloor 1.9\rfloor =1\)
- 3.
The factor two enhancement, as compared to the typical 1 / N, obtained for \(n=1\) is more closely related to coherent backscattering, since it is a manifestation of weak localisation.
- 4.
One retrieves the semicircle, but should incorporate finite size corrections for small N.
- 5.
The quantum recurrence theorem (Bocchieri and Loinger 1957) implies that for any state vector \(\psi \in \mathcal {H}\), any one-parameter group \(\{U_t \mid t \in \mathbb {R} \}\) and any \(\epsilon > 0\), there is a time \(t_0 > 0\) such that \(||(\mathbb {1} - U_{t_0})\left| \psi \right\rangle || < \epsilon \). However, note that this does not imply periodicity.
- 6.
Using the exchange operator which is later defined in (4.46), we can make this reasoning more rigorous by noting that \(e^{-it_0H}e^{i\theta }\left| \mathrm out\right\rangle = e^{-it_0H}e^{i\theta }J\left| \mathrm in\right\rangle \underset{[H,J]=0}{=} J e^{-it_0H}e^{i\theta }\left| \mathrm in\right\rangle \underset{(4.39)}{=} e^{2i\theta } J \left| \mathrm out\right\rangle \underset{(4.47)}{=} e^{2i\theta } \left| \mathrm in\right\rangle \).
- 7.
Which fixes a state’s parity.
- 8.
This is equivalent to sampling the Hamiltonian in the site basis, with
while explicitly fixing \(H_{i\, j}=H_{i\, N-j+1}=H_{N-i+1\, j}=H_{N-i+1\, N-j+1j}\).
- 9.
This symmetric behaviour on the time axis is quantified by \(\left|\left\langle e_i,e^{-i t H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 = \left|\left\langle e_i,e^{-i t H} J^2 \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 = \left|\left\langle J\, e_i,e^{-i t H} \mathrm{out} \right\rangle \right|^2 \approx \left|\left\langle J\, e_i,e^{-i (t + t_0) H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2\), where we explicitly use that there is a time \(t_0\) for which \(e^{- i t_0 H}\left| \mathrm in\right\rangle \approx e^{i \theta } \left| \mathrm out\right\rangle \). Moreover, an additional symmetry around \(t_0/2\) is implied, which follows from \(\left|\left\langle \mathrm{out},e^{-i t H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 \approx \left|\left\langle e^{- i t_0 H} \mathrm{in},e^{-i t H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 =\left|\left\langle e^{- i (t_0 - t) H} \mathrm{in},\mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 = \left|\overline{\left\langle \mathrm{in}, e^{- i (t_0 - t) H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle }\right|^2 = \left|\left\langle \mathrm{in}, e^{- i (t_0 - t) H} \mathrm{in} \right\rangle \right|^2 \).
- 10.
Or, rather, the paradigmatic double-well potential.
- 11.
Throughout the remainder of this chapter, the terms “first passage time” and “transfer time” are therefore used interchangeably.
- 12.
We do notice that finite size effects slightly alter the prediction of Eq. (4.93), resulting for example in an actual \(\alpha '\approx 0.93\), obtained by numerics, instead of the analytically predicted \(\alpha '=0.95\) both for \(N=20\), \(\xi =2\) and \(\chi =0.0656234\).
- 13.
Due to the subtlety of the argument, the phrasing is delicate, hence the wording here is similar to that of Walschaers et al. (2015).
- 14.
We warn the reader that throughout the text \(\tau \) is used as a stochastic quantity, which may make definition (4.101) somewhat misleading.
- 15.
Given that a stochastic variable X is normally distributed, the distribution of \(\left|X\right|\) is called a half-normal (if \(\mathbb {E}(X)=0\)) or folded normal distribution (Leone et al. 1961). The terminology refers to the fact that the negative part of the probability distribution is literally folded to the positive side.
- 16.
All our attempts resulted in page-long expressions which were neither useful nor insightful.
- 17.
We use the property that \(x=e^{\log x}\), which implies that \(f(V')= \frac{1}{N}\log \left( e^{-{V'}^2} \left( \text {erfc}\left( V'\right) \right) ^{\frac{N}{2}-1} V'\right) \).
- 18.
Where \(\chi /\sqrt{N}\) is the typical (RMS) coupling between the input/output and the intermediate sites, and \(\xi /\sqrt{N}\) denotes the typical (RMS) coupling strength between the intermediate sites.
- 19.
This is also consistent with the physical idea behind the CAT mechanism: The coupling to a second chaotic (hence modelled by the GOE Bohigas et al. 1993) degree of freedom (here the randomly interacting intermediate sites, where the randomness comes from conformational changes in the macromolecular arrangement, in particular mimicking vibrational background degrees of freedom) enhances the tunnelling rate in a donor-acceptor system with vanishing direct coupling (Tomsovic and Ullmo 1994).
- 20.
Whether more efficient light harvesting is (or has ever been) evolutionarily beneficial (and to what extent) remains an open question. There is a chance that the answer to this question depends on the organism and even on its ecosystem.
- 21.
Due to the centrosymmetry we only consider even numbers of sites N. Moreover, \(N=2\) implies there are no intermediate sites and thus we obtain the benchmark system.
- 22.
Note that we use “\(\mathrm{cte}\)” to indicate an unspecified constant.
- 23.
Note that large densities of sites translate in many contributing energy levels in the perturbative series.
- 24.
Relevant network sizes in photosynthesis are of the order \(N\sim 10\) (Blankenship 2002).
- 25.
- 26.
Clock speed of 2.6 GHz, 8x256 KB of level 2 cache and 20 MB level 3 cache. All demanding computations, i.e. those that cannot be done on a normal laptop, were done on the bwGRiD.
- 27.
There is a much higher density of dominant doublet realisations in the centrosymmetric GOE than in the standard GOE.
- 28.
Common acronym to denote the community studying atomic, molecular, and optical physics.
- 29.
This provides a natural connection to the random matrix theory of many-particle systems.
- 30.
Whether the proposed mechanism can also be implemented in such systems is of course a very different question.
References
M. Abramowitz, I. Stegan, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover Publications, Mineola, 1965)
E. Akkermans, Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011)
R. Alicki, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications, 2nd edn. (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 1987)
H.V. Amerongen, L. Valkunas, R.V. Grondelle, Photosynthetic Excitons (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000)
N.W. Ashcroft, N.D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1976)
C.J. Bardeen, The structure and dynamics of molecular excitons. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 127–148 (2014)
S. Barnett, Matrices: Methods and Applications, Oxford Applied Mathematics and Computing Science Series (Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford [England], New York, 1990)
N. Biggs, Algebraic Graph Theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge Mathematical Library (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993)
R.E. Blankenship, Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 2002)
P. Bocchieri, A. Loinger, Quantum recurrence theorem. Phys. Rev. 107, 337–338 (1957)
O. Bohigas, S. Tomsovic, D. Ullmo, Manifestations of classical phase space structures in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rep. 223, 43–133 (1993)
H.-P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)
O. Brodier, P. Schlagheck, D. Ullmo, Resonance-assisted tunneling. Ann. Phys. 300, 88–136 (2002)
P. Bunyk, E. Hoskinson, M. Johnson, E. Tolkacheva, F. Altomare, A. Berkley, R. Harris, J. Hilton, T. Lanting, A. Przybysz, J. Whittaker, Architectural considerations in the design of a superconducting quantum annealing processor. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 1–10 (2014)
A. Cantoni, P. Butler, Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of symmetric centrosymmetric matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 13, 275–288 (1976)
A. Chabchoub, M. Fink, Time-reversal generation of rogue waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 124101 (2014)
A.M. Childs, Universal computation by quantum walk. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180501 (2009)
M. Christandl, N. Datta, A. Ekert, A.J. Landahl, Perfect state transfer in quantum spin networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187902 (2004)
M. Christandl, N. Datta, T.C. Dorlas, A. Ekert, A. Kay, A.J. Landahl, Perfect transfer of arbitrary states in quantum spin networks. Phys. Rev. A 71, 032312 (2005)
P.J. Davis, Circulant Matrices. Pure and Applied Mathematics (Wiley, New York, 1979)
C. Dembowski, H.-D. Gräf, A. Heine, R. Hofferbert, H. Rehfeld, A. Richter, First experimental evidence for chaos-assisted tunneling in a microwave annular billiard. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 867–870 (2000)
B. Derrida, Y. Pomeau, Random networks of automata: a simple annealed approximation. EPL 1, 45 (1986)
G.S. Engel, T.R. Calhoun, E.L. Read, T.-K. Ahn, T. Mančal, Y.-C. Cheng, R.E. Blankenship, G.R. Fleming, Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature 446, 782–786 (2007)
G. Ergün, Y.V. Fyodorov, Level curvature distribution in a model of two uncoupled chaotic subsystems. Phys. Rev. E 68, 046124 (2003)
E.F. Fama, R. Roll, Some properties of symmetric stable distributions. JASA 63, 817–836 (1968)
E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision trees. Phys. Rev. A 58, 915–928 (1998)
M. Frazier, B. Taddese, T. Antonsen, S.M. Anlage, Nonlinear time reversal in a wave chaotic system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 063902 (2013)
P. Gaspard, Quantum chaotic scattering. Scholarpedia 9, 9806 (2014)
F. Haake, QuantumSignatures of Chaos, vol. 54 (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2010)
F. Haake, K. Życzkowski, Random-matrix theory and eigenmodes of dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. A 42, 1013–1016 (1990)
H. Haken, Quantum Field Theory of Solids: An Introduction (North-Holland Pub. Co, Amsterdam, New York, 1976)
C.S. Hamilton, R. Kruse, L. Sansoni, C. Silberhorn, I. Jex, Driven quantum walks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083602 (2014)
B. Hein, G. Tanner, Quantum search algorithms on a regular lattice. Phys. Rev. A 82, 012326 (2010)
F.B. Hildebrand, Introduction to Numerical Analysis, 2nd edn. (Dover Publications, New York, 1987)
Y. Imry, Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009)
A. Kay, Perfect state transfer: Beyond nearest-neighbor couplings. Phys. Rev. A 73, 032306 (2006)
C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th edn. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2005)
C. Kittel, C.Y. Fong, Quantum Theory of Solids, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1987)
V.F. Krotov, Global methods in optimal control theory, in Advances in Nonlinear Dynamics and Control: A Report from Russia, ed. by A.B. Kurzhanski. Progress in Systems and Control Theory, vol. 17 (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1993), pp. 74–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0349-0_3
I. Kuprov, Spin system trajectory analysis under optimal control pulses. J. Mag. Reson. 233, 107–112 (2013)
T. Lanting, A.J. Przybysz, A.Y. Smirnov, F.M. Spedalieri, M.H. Amin, A.J. Berkley, R. Harris, F. Altomare, S. Boixo, P. Bunyk, N. Dickson, C. Enderud, J.P. Hilton, E. Hoskinson, M.W. Johnson, E. Ladizinsky, N. Ladizinsky, R. Neufeld, T. Oh, I. Perminov, C. Rich, M.C. Thom, E. Tolkacheva, S. Uchaikin, A.B. Wilson, G. Rose, Entanglement in a quantum annealing processor. Phys. Rev. X 4, 021041 (2014)
P.S. Laplace, Memoir on the probability of the causes of events. Stat. Sci. 1, 364–378 (1986)
F.C. Leone, L.S. Nelson, R.B. Nottingham, The folded normal distribution. Technometrics 3, 543–550 (1961)
G. Lerosey, J.D. Rosny, A. Tourin, M. Fink, Focusing beyond the diffraction limit with far-field time reversal. Science 315, 1120–1122 (2007)
F. Leyvraz, D. Ullmo, The level splitting distribution in chaos-assisted tunnelling. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29, 2529 (1996)
R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, 3rd edn. (Oxford science publications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2000)
D. Manzano, Quantum transport in networks and photosynthetic complexes at the steady state. PLoS ONE 8, e57041 (2013)
V. May, O. Kühn, Charge and Energy Transfer dynamics in Molecular Systems: A Theoretical Introduction, 1st edn. (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, New York, 2000)
S. Mostarda, F. Levi, D. Prada-Gracia, F. Mintert, F. Rao, Structure–dynamics relationship in coherent transport through disordered systems. Nat. Commun. 4 (2013)
O. Mülken, A. Blumen, Continuous-time quantum walks: Models for coherent transport on complex networks. Phys. Rep. 502, 37–87 (2011)
J. Nelson, The Physics of Solar Cells (Imperial College Press, Distributed by World Scientific Publication, River Edge, London, 2003)
A. Ortega, M. Vyas, L. Benet, Quantum efficiencies in finite disordered networks connected by many-body interactions: Quantum efficiencies in finite disordered networks. Ann. Phys. 527, 748–756 (2015)
M. Reed, B. Simon, Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, 1st edn. (Academic Press, New York, 1975)
J. Roland, N.J. Cerf, Noise resistance of adiabatic quantum computation using random matrix theory. Phys. Rev. A 71, 032330 (2005)
I. Rotter, A non-Hermitian Hamilton operator and the physics of open quantum systems. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 153001 (2009)
A. Sakharov, The Climb (2013)
M. Sarovar, A. Ishizaki, G.R. Fleming, K.B. Whaley, Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes. Nat. Phys. 6, 462–467 (2010)
T. Scholak, Transport and coherence in disordered networks. Ph.D. thesis, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, 2011
T. Scholak, F. Mintert, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Transport and entanglement, in Biomolecular Systems, ed. by E.R. Weber, M. Thorwart, U. Würfel. Quantum Efficiency in Complex Systems, 1st edn. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2010)
T. Scholak, F. de Melo, T. Wellens, F. Mintert, A. Buchleitner, Efficient and coherent excitation transfer across disordered molecular networks. Phys. Rev. E 83, 021912 (2011a)
T. Scholak, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Optimal networks for excitonic energy transport. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 184012 (2011b)
T. Scholak, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, The optimization topography of exciton transport. EPL 96, 10001 (2011c)
T. Scholak, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Spectral backbone of excitation transport in ultracold Rydberg gases. Phys. Rev. A 90, 063415 (2014)
H.S. Seung, H. Sompolinsky, N. Tishby, Statistical mechanics of learning from examples. Phys. Rev. A 45, 6056–6091 (1992)
M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, 2003)
D.A. Steck, W.H. Oskay, M.G. Raizen, Observation of chaos-assisted tunneling between islands of stability. Science 293, 274–278 (2001)
D.S. Steiger, T.F. Rønnow, M. Troyer, Heavy tails in the distribution of time to solution for classical and quantum annealing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 230501 (2015)
S. Tomsovic, Chaos-assisted tunnelling in the absence of reflexion symmetry. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 9469 (1998)
S. Tomsovic, D. Ullmo, Chaos-assisted tunneling. Phys. Rev. E 50, 145–162 (1994)
M. Walschaers, J.F.-d.-C. Diaz, R. Mulet, A. Buchleitner, Optimally designed quantum transport across disordered networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 180601 (2013)
M. Walschaers, R. Mulet, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Statistical theory of designed quantum transport across disordered networks. Phys. Rev. E 91, 042137 (2015)
G.H. Wannier, The structure of electronic excitation levels in insulating crystals. Phys. Rev. 52, 191–197 (1937)
H.M. Wiseman, G.J. Milburn, Quantum Measurement and Control (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010)
P.-E. Wolf, G. Maret, Weak localization and coherent backscattering of photons in disordered media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2696–2699 (1985)
J. Zakrzewski, D. Delande, A. Buchleitner, Ionization via chaos assisted tunneling. Phys. Rev. E 57, 1458–1474 (1998)
T. Zech, Hidden symmetries of quantum transport in photosynthesis. Diploma thesis, Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, 2013
T. Zech, M. Walschaers, T. Scholak, R. Mulet, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Quantum transport in biological functional units: noise, disorder, structure. Fluct. Noise Lett. 12, 1340007 (2013)
T. Zech, R. Mulet, T. Wellens, A. Buchleitner, Centrosymmetry enhances quantum transport in disordered molecular networks. New J. Phys. 16, 055002 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walschaers, M. (2018). Efficient Transport in Closed Systems. In: Statistical Benchmarks for Quantum Transport in Complex Systems. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93151-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93151-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93150-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93151-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)