Skip to main content

Foreign Markets and Professionals: The Gatekeepers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soft Power Made in China
  • 458 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores foreign markets and media professionals as the cultural intermediaries and the gatekeepers in importing countries. The embrace of television series—a soft power medium—by media practitioners is conditioned not only by the market structures of the potential importing countries, but also by the practitioners’ and buyers’ actions. Their actions in South Korean and Japanese media markets also reflect their evaluations of the impact of Chinese television series on potential values for audience ratings, economic capital, and consumption by local audiences in the importing countries. These actors are rarely the focus of empirical investigation, as previous research on soft power often implicitly considers the importing countries and domestic institutions. Addressing this gap in the body of literature can generate a clearer understanding of the conditions under which soft power policies either facilitate or discourage foreign television programs’ successful importation into the receiving countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more on field analysis in Sociology, see Hanquinet and Savage (2015) and Savage and Silva (2013).

  2. 2.

    It is formerly known as the State Administration of Radio, Film, and Television (SARFT ). It is under the State Council and to administer and supervise the state-owned enterprises engaged in the television, radio, and film industries.

  3. 3.

    CM20, interview with a Chinese academic, February 28, 2012, Shenzhen, China.

  4. 4.

    CM36, interview with a Chinese academic, August 4, 2013, Beijing, China.

  5. 5.

    Such events held in China include Beijing International TV Week, Shanghai TV Festival, Sichuan TV Festival, and Quanguo guochan dianshijiemu zhanshi jiaoyihui (Domestic TV Programs Exchange). Venues outside of China include Asia TV Forum & Market in Singapore, Tokyo International Film Festival in Japan, Banff World Media Festival (formerly, Banff World Television Festival) in Canada, BRITDOC Foundation (formerly Channel 4 BRITDOC Foundation), Celtic Media Festival (Celtic Film Media Festival) in the United Kingdom, DISCOP, Burgh International Television Festival, Festival International de Programmes Audiovisuals, FesTVal in Spain, ITVFest (Independent Television Festival), Monte-Carlo Television Festival, New York Television Festival, MIPTV & MIPCOM in France.

  6. 6.

    Details of the products include the number of episodes , featured actors or actresses, similar products that were on the market, and potentially attractive sales points.

  7. 7.

    CM21, interview with a Chinese media professional February 28, 2012, Shenzhen, China.

  8. 8.

    JM5, interview with a Nippon TV producer, May 10, 2013, Tokyo, Japan.

  9. 9.

    This related matter is often handled by the Global Business Department, although the actual name can vary.

  10. 10.

    A “broker” or an “agent” is junggaein in Korean and chukajin in Japanese.

  11. 11.

    KM1, interview with a South Korean producer, December 20, 2011, Seoul, South Korea.

  12. 12.

    This can be also found in other types of cultural markets such as news media, the art worlds (Becker 1982), and the fashion industry (Mears 2011).

  13. 13.

    Here television channels that are available in South Korea through a linear method are not included. A linear service is one in which program providers determine the program scheduling. A non-linear service is one where program providers provide catalogues and viewers decide viewing time based on the catalogues. A linear method prevails on satellite or foreign channels , which directly broadcast from a source country to other countries. CCTV and TVB are the examples of a linear service.

  14. 14.

    KM4, interview with a Korean television producer, January 19, 2012, Seoul, South Korea.

  15. 15.

    If viewers want to watch Western channels such as HBO and Discovery, they need to subscribe to an extra service that includes these channels.

  16. 16.

    Korean-related programs not only include dramas, movies, and variety shows from South Korea, but also entertainment and variety programs that are made in Japan.

  17. 17.

    KM9, interview with a South Korean producer, March 17, 2012, Seoul, South Korea.

  18. 18.

    This is a prevailing idea among both producers and audiences in South Korea.

  19. 19.

    KM4, interview with a South Korean TV producer, January 19, 2012, Seoul, South Korea.

  20. 20.

    See for the phenomenon of Three Kingdoms (Samgukji) in South Korea in Chapter 3. Three Kingdoms, Huangbihong and Shuihuji are examples.

  21. 21.

    See the phenomenon of muhyeop novels in South Korea. Jin Yong’s novels are famous in South Korea.

  22. 22.

    KM1, interview with a South Korean producer, December 20, 2011, Seoul, South Korea.

  23. 23.

    Ibid.

  24. 24.

    JM6, interview with a Japanese media professional, May 10, 2012, Tokyo, Japan.

  25. 25.

    JM5, interview with a Japanese media professional, May 10, 2012, Tokyo, Japan.

  26. 26.

    In this line, see Korea Creative Content Agency (2010).

  27. 27.

    JM11, interview with a Japanese media professional, May 16, 2012, Tokyo, Japan.

  28. 28.

    KM2, interview with a South Korean media professional, December 22, 2011, Seoul, South Korea.

  29. 29.

    JM4, interview with a Japanese media professional, May 8, 2012, Tokyo, Japan.

References

  • Asia Content Marketing Association. n.d. Accessed April 14, 2014. http://asiacontentmarketing.net/.

  • Asia TV Forum and Market. 2016. Accessed February 17, 2017. http://www.asiatvforum.com/.

  • AsiaN. n.d. Accessed April 14, 2014. www.asiantv.co.kr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglobe. n.d. Accessed April 5, 2014. http://broadband.biglobe.ne.jp/contents/china_sp.html.

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press. Translated in English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bühlmann, Felix, Thomas David, and André Mach. 2013. Cosmopolitan Capital and the Internationalization of the Field of Business Elites: Evidence from the Swiss Case. Cultural Sociology 7 (2): 211–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Channel Ching. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. ching.hyundaimedia.com.

  • China Television Drama Production Industry Association. 2015. Notice on 2015 China (Shenzhen) International TV Drama & TV Program Fair. Accessed September 15, 2017. http://jyh.ctpia.com.cn/en/Overview/content_1.shtml.

  • Chinese Drama Legend. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://www.chuka-drama.com/lineup/.

  • Cinem@rt. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://www.cinemart.co.jp/dramax/.

  • Culture Convenience Club. 2012. TSUTAYA、Taiwan・Taojplishi nai ni hatsu shutten Taiwan CMC gurūpu to no kokusaitekina entateinment jigyō ni kansuru senryakuteki teikei no ikkantoshite 「ageikageoto (yaiinin)」ga kamei、12gatsu27nini minkenten ōpun [Information regarding the business and capital Joint Venture between Culture Convenience Club Co., Ltd. and the CMC Magnetics Corporation of Taiwan]. Accessed November 5, 2013. http://www.ccc.co.jp/company/news/2012/20121226_003534.html.

  • Edwards, Lee. 2012. Exploring the Role of Public Relations as a Cultural Intermediary Occupation. Cultural Sociology 6 (4): 438–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esraey, Ashley, and Xiao Qiang. 2011. Digital Communication and Political Change. International Journal of Communication 5: 298–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginga. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://www.ch-ginga.jp/program/.

  • Hanquinet, Laurie, and Mike Savage, eds. 2015. Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Italian Trade Commission [Istituto nazionale per il Commercio Estero]. 2011. China Television Industry Market Report. June 3. Shanghai: Italian Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Susanne, and Marc Verboord. 2015. Cultural Mediators and Gatekeepers. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. James D. Wright, 2nd ed., 440–446. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Video Software Association [JVA]. 2011. Bideo Sofutowea Tōkei Chōsa Repōto 2001–2011 [Video Software Statistical Survey Reports 2001–2011]. Tokyo: Japan Video Software Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. JVA rentaru shoppu no dōkō rentaru shoppu ni kansuru [The Trend of JVA Rental Shops]. JVA nenji chōsa [JVA Annual Survey on Rental Shops]. Tokyo: Japan Video Software Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghwa TV. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. zhtv.interest.me.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Creative Content Agency. 2010. Ilbon ui contentsu sanoep [Japan’s Contents Industry]. Issue Paper 27. Seoul: Korea Creative Content Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. 2010 nyeon bangsong contents suchulip hyeonhwang gwa jeonmang [The Current Situation of and Prospects for Exports and Imports of Media Contents in 2010]. KOCCA Focus 5 (3): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korean Broadcasting Commission [Bangsong Wiewonhoe]. 2002. 2002 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2002]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. 2003 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2003]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. 2004 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2004]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. 2005 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2005]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. 2006 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2006]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. 2007 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2007]. Seoul: Korean Broadcasting Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korea Communications Commission [Bangsong Tongshin Wiewonhoe]. 2008. 2008 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2008]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. 2009 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2009]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. 2010 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2010]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. 2011 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2011]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. 2012 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2012]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Sae-sam. 2016. Jungguk dramarel sayonghaneun bangbeop [How to Use ‘Chinese Dramas’]. Donga Ilbo, April 19. Accessed June 27, 2017. http://news.donga.com/3/all/20160419/77654374/1.

  • Mears, Ashley. 2011. Pricing Beauty: The Making of a Fashion Model. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning and Korea Communications Commission [Bangsong Tongshin Wiewonhoe]. 2013. 2013 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2013]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. 2014 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2014]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. 2015 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2015]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. 2016 nyeon Bangsong Siltae Sanoepjosa Bogoseo [A Report of Broadcasting Industry of 2016]. Seoul: Korea Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, Liz. 2012. Beyond Cultural Intermediaries? A Socio-Technical Perspective on the Market for Social Interventions. European Journal of Cultural Studies 15 (5): 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, Seio. 2016. The Genesis, Structure and Transformation of the Contemporary Chinese Cinematic Field: Global Linkages and National Refractions. Global Media and Communication 12 (1): 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neco. n.d. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://www.necoweb.com/neco/program/category.php?id=3.

  • Savage, Mike, and Elizabeth B. Silva. 2013. Field Analysis in Cultural Sociology. Cultural Sociology 7 (2): 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanghaiist. 2015. Even More Anti-Japan War Dramas Will Fill China’s Airwaves in Run-up to Victory Day Celebrations. Shanghaiist, August 30. Accessed July 22, 2016. http://shanghaiist.com/2015/08/30/more_anti_japan_dramas.php.

  • Smith Maguire, Jennifer, and Julian Matthews. 2012. Are We All Cultural Intermediaries Now? An Introduction to Cultural Intermediaries in Context. European Journal of Cultural Studies 15 (5): 551–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Wendy. 2011. New Strategies of China’s Film Industry as Soft Power. Global Media and Communication 6 (3): 317–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tōyōkeizaishinpōsha, ed. 2012. Gyōkai chizu 2013-nenban [Map of Industry 2013]. Tokyo: Tōyōkeizaishinpōsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Huning. 1993. Zuowei Guojia Shili de Wenhua: Ruanquanli [National Culture Power: The Soft Authority]. Fudan Daxue Xuebao [Fudan University Journal Social Sciences Version] March: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Hongying, and Yeh-Chung Lu. 2008. The Conception of Soft Power and Its Policy Implications: A Comparative Study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China 15 (56): 438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Miles. 2015. China’s Bizarre Anti-Japanese TV and Movie Kitsch Backfire. Washington Times, May 21. Accessed July 22, 2016. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/may/21/inside-china-anti-japanese-tv-propaganda-dramas-ba/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, C.S. (2018). Foreign Markets and Professionals: The Gatekeepers. In: Soft Power Made in China. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93115-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics