Abstract
Socio-Emotional Relationship Therapy transforms how couples enact societal discourses that maintain power disparities. It evolved out of action research in which clinicians studied how they addressed these discourses in the moment by moment of couple therapy. In this chapter we describe the critical social constructionist foundations of SERT and report four research studies that drew upon grounded theory, task analysis, and narrative analysis to examine how discursive gender practices organize heterosexual couple therapy and how therapists can position their actions to transform inequitable societal discourses. Three phases of clinical work are identified: (1) positioning—attuning to sociocultural emotion and discourse and exposing relational consequences of power inequities; (2) interrupting—shifting sociocultural discourses in in-the-moment relational power processes; and (3) practicing—envisioning, enacting, and reinforcing increased options for mutuality and shared relational responsibility. We encourage practitioners to study their work in order to demystify intersections of social discourse and clinical change.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baber, K. M. (2009). Postmodern feminist perspectives and families. In S. A. Lloyd, A. L. Few, & K. R. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of feminist family studies (pp. 56–68). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and social relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ChenFeng, J. L., & Galick, A. (2015). How gender discourses hijack couple therapy-and how to avoid it. In C. Knudson-Martin, M. A. Wells, & S. K. Samman (Eds.), Socio-emotional relationship therapy: Bridging emotion, societal context, and couples interaction (pp. 41–52). New York, NY: Springer.
ChenFeng, J., Kim, L., Knudson-Martin, C., & Wu, Y. (2017). Application of socio-emotional relationship therapy with couples of Asian heritage: Addressing issues of culture, gender, and power. Family Process, 56, 558–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12251
Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Cozolinio, L. (2016). Why therapy works: Using our minds to change our brains. New York, NY: Norton.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x
Fairclough, N. (2016). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 86–108). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Fishbane, M. D. (2013). Loving with the brain in mind: Neurobiology & couple therapy. New York, NY: Norton.
Foucault, M. (1973). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York, NY: Vintage.
Garcia, M., Košutic, I., & McDowell, T. (2015). Peace on earth/war at home: The role of emotion regulation in social justice work. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 27, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2015.1005945
Gergen, K. J. (2006). Therapeutic realities: Collaboration, oppression, and relational flow. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
Greenberg, L. S. (2007). A guide to conducting a task analysis of psychotherapeutic change. Psychotherapy Research, 17(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503300600720390
Harré, R., Moghaddam, F. M., Cairnie, T. P., Rothbart, D., & Sabat, S. R. (2009). Recent advances in positioning theory. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308101417
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
Kahn, S. A., & Monk, G. (2017). Narrative supervision as a social justice practice. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 36, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2017.36.1.7
Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12011
Knudson-Martin, C. (2016). Gender in couple and family life: Toward inclusiveness and equality. In S. Kelly (Ed.), Issues in couple and family therapy: Across socioeconomics, ethnicities, and sexualities (pp. 153–180). New York, NY: Praeger.
Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2010). A socio-emotional approach to couple therapy: Linking social context and couple interaction. Family Process, 49, 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2010.01328.x
Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2015). Bridging emotion, societal discourse, and couple interaction in couple therapy. In C. Knudson-Martin, M. A. Wells, & S. K. Samman (Eds.), Socio-emotional relationship therapy: Bridging emotion, societal context, and couples interaction (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Springer.
Knudson-Martin, C., Huenergardt, D., Lafontant, K., Bishop, L., Schaepper, J., & Wells, M. (2015). Competencies for addressing gender and power in couple therapy: A socio-emotional approach. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 41, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12068
Krolekke, C., & Sorensen, A. S. (2006). Gender communication theories and analysis: From silence to performance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Lobo, E., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2015). Integrating positioning theory and neurobiology to counter gender inequality. Roundtable. National Council on Family Relations annual meeting, Vancouver, BC, November 11.
Lorber, J. (2005). Breaking the bowls: Degendering and feminist change. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Loscocco, K., & Walzer, S. (2013). Gender and the culture of heterosexual marriage in the United States. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12003
McDowell, T. (2015). Applying critical social theories to family therapy practice. New York, NY: Springer.
McDowell, T., Knudson-Martin, C., & Bermudez, J. M. (2018). Socioculturally attuned family therapy: Toward equitable theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Porges, S. W. (2009). Reciprocal influences between body and brain in the perception and expression of affect. In D. Fosha, D. J. Siegel, & M. F. Solomon (Eds.), The healing power of emotion: Affective neuroscience, development & clinical practice (pp. 27–54). New York, NY: Norton.
Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Samman, S. K., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2015). Relational engagement in heterosexual couple therapy: How men move from “I” to “we”. In C. Knudson-Martin, M. A. Wells, & S. K. Samman (Eds.), Socio-emotional relationship therapy: Bridging emotion, societal context, and couples interaction (pp. 79–92). New York, NY: Springer.
Shotter, J. (2014). Methods of inquiring into “the stuff” of everyday life. In G. Simon & A. Chard (Eds.), Systemic inquiry: Innovations in reflexive practice research (pp. 95–123). Farnhill, UK: Everything is Connected.
Siegel, D. J. (2012). The developing mind: How relationships and the brain interact to shape who we are (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
St. George, S., Wulff, D., & Strong, T. (2014). Researching interpersonal patterns. In K. Tomm, S. S. George, D. Wulff, & T. Strong (Eds.), Patterns in interpersonal interactions: Inviting relational understandings for therapeutic change (pp. 210–228). New York, NY: Routledge.
Strong, T. (2017). Neuroscience discourse and the collaborative therapies? In J. Duvall & M.-N. Beaudoin (Eds.), Collaborative therapy and interpersonal neurobiology: Evolving practices (pp. 116–127). London: Routledge.
Sutherland, O., Turner, J., & Dienhart, A. (2013). Responsive persistence. Part I: Therapist influence in postmodern practice. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39, 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00333.x
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Williams, K. (2011). A socio-emotional relational framework for infidelity: The relational justice approach. Family Process, 50(4), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01374.x
Williams, K., Galick, A., Knudson-Martin, C., & Huenergardt, D. (2013). Toward mutual support: A task analysis of the relational justice approach to infidelity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00324.x
Williams, K., & Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Do therapists address gender and power in infidelity? A feminist analysis of the treatment literature. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00303.x
Winslade, J. (2009). Tracing lines of flight: Implications of the work of Gilles Deleuze. Family Process, 48, 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01286.x
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Critical discourse studies: History, agenda, theory, and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 1–22). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knudson-Martin, C., ChenFeng, J., Galick, A., Lobo, E., Samman, S.K., Williams, K. (2018). Transforming Gender Discourse in Couple Therapy: Researching Intersections of Societal Discourse, Emotion, and Interaction. In: Smoliak, O., Strong, T. (eds) Therapy as Discourse. The Language of Mental Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93067-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93066-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93067-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)