Skip to main content
  • 172 Accesses

Abstract

Education reform agendas have created numerous, extensive, and expensive educational policy mandates wedded to standardization, centralization, educator accountability, and privatization, foregoing any obligation to enact broader social reforms necessary to abolish economic oppression and the embedded inequities that obstruct equal access and outcomes. The current narrative shifts the social responsibilities (at unfair financial burdens) to schools by both legislating health and welfare supports to schools and cutting social programs previously intended to provide necessary provisioning and sustenance to those in need. The increased social, emotional, health, and welfare responsibilities given to schools is not only a weak attempt at maintaining a social contract for the public good; it is also an incredible obstacle to the achievement of the academic agenda of which schools are measured against.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50 Myths and lies that threaten america’s public schools: The real crisis in education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2006). The forms of capital. In H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabough, & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Education, globalization & social change (pp. 105–118). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). Schooling in capitalist America: Education reform and the contradictions of economic life. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, P. L., & Welner, K. G. (2013). Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricant, M., & Fine, M. (2013). The changing politics of education: Privatization and the dispossessed lives left behind. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist realism is there no alternative. Washington, DC: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Gordon, L. (1994). A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the US welfare state. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19(2), 309–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2006). Stormy weather: Katrina and the politics of disposability. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (2014). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. B., & Rose, M. (2013). Public education under seige. Philadelphia: Univeristy of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2007). Education, markets, and the public good: The selected works of David F. Labaree. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2008). The winning ways of a losing strategy: Educationalizing social problems in the United States. Educational Theory, 58(4), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labaree, D. F. (2012). Someone has to fail: The zero-sum game of public schooling. Cambridge, MA: First Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladsen-Billings, G. (2015, April 10). Hip hop, hip hope: Culturally relevant pedagogy. North Dartmouth, MA: UMass Dartmouth Colloquium Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education & Massachusetts Department of Public Health. (2014). Health and risk behaviors of Massachusetts youth 2013. Retreived March 23, 2015, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/cnp/hprograms/yrbs/2013report.pdf

  • Means, A. J. (2013). Schooling in the age of austerity:Urban education and the struggle for democratic life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paraskeva, J. (2011). Conflicts in curriculum theory: Challenging hegemonic epistemologies. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pedroni, T. C. (2016, June). Education. North Dartmouth, MA: UMASS Dartmouth Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, W. J. (2011). America’s public schools, from the common school to “No Child Left Behind”. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, K. J. (2014). The new two tiered education system in the United States: Expanding and commodifying poverty and inequality. In S. N. Haymes, M. V. Haymes, & R. J. Miller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of poverty in the United States (pp. 226–231). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sullivan, T.L. (2018). Schools Can Fix It. In: The Educationalization of Student Emotional and Behavioral Health. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93064-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93064-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93063-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93064-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics