Advertisement

Digital Revolution Tamed in the Recording Industry

  • Hyojung Sun
Chapter

Abstract

This final chapter summarises the central theme and arguments of this book. It discusses how this book is recontextualising the knowledge and understanding of digital disruption in the recording industry and how it overcomes previous linear and simplistic accounts. I look to readdress the complicated process of digital music valorisation where the protracted nature of the digital music business impacting upon innovation and explain the reasons behind why the digital revolution has been tamed. Lastly, the chapter reviews the major points explored throughout the book to explode the myth surrounding digital revolution in the digital recording industry.

References

  1. Alderman, J. 2002. Sonic Boom: Napster, MP3, and the New Pioneers of Music. London: Four Estate.Google Scholar
  2. Arditi, D. 2014. iTunes: Breaking Barriers and Building Walls. Popular Music and Society 37 (4): 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrow, K.J. 1962. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies 29 (3): 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Attali, J. 1985. Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baden-Fuller, C., and S. Haefliger. 2013. Business Models and Technological Innovation. Long Range Planning 46 (6): 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baden-Fuller, C., and M.S. Morgan. 2010. Business Models as Models. Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bakker, P. 2005. File-Sharing—Fight, Ignore or Compete: Paid Download Services vs. P2P-Networks. Telematics and Informatics 22 (1–2): 41–55.Google Scholar
  8. Barlow, J.P. 1994. The Economy of Ideas [online]. Wired. Available from https://www.wired.com/1994/03/economy-ideas/. Accessed 31 May 2017.
  9. Barlow, J.P. 1996. A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace [online]. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Available from https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html. Accessed 19 Sept 2015.
  10. Barr, K. 2013. Theorizing Music Streaming: Preliminary Investigations. Scottish Music Review 3 (2). Available from http://www.scottishmusicreview.org/index.php/SMR/article/view/40
  11. Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burkart, P., and T. McCourt. 2006. Digital Music Wars: Ownership and Control of the Celestial Jukebox. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, D., and I. Rogers. 2014. Fifteen Years of ‘Utopia’: Napster and Pitchfork as Technologies of Democratization. First Monday 19 (10). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5543/4122 or http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i10.5543.
  14. Christman, E. 2013. Fourth Quarter Market Share Report: Indies & Market Share [online]. Billboard. Available from http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/5763065/fourth-quarter-market-share-report-indies-market-share. Accessed 28 Nov 2013.
  15. CREATe. 2017. CREATe Copyright and Innovation Network Launch Workshop. London, May 26.Google Scholar
  16. Cummings, A.S. 2010. From Monopoly to Intellectual Property: Music Piracy and the Remaking of American Copyright, 1909–1971. The Journal of American History 97 (3): 659–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fleck, J. 1988. Innofusion or Diffusation? The Nature of Technological Development in Robotics. Edinburgh: Research Centre for Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  18. Galuszka, P. 2012. Netlabels and Democratization of the Recording Industry. First Monday 17 (7). Available from https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3770/3278 or https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v17i7.3770.
  19. Gayer, A., and O. Shy. 2006. Publishers, Artists, and Copyright Enforcement. Information Economics and Policy 18 (4): 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geels, F.W. 2002. Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-Study. Research Policy 31: 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graham, I., G. Spinardi, and R. Williams. 1996. Diversity in the Emergence of Electronic Commerce. Journal of Information Technology 11 (2): 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halmenschlager, C., and P. Waelbroeck. 2014. Fighting Free with Free: Freemium vs. Piracy. Available from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2475641or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2475641.
  23. Hesmondhalgh, D. 2006. Digitalisation, Copyright and the Music Industries. In Unpacking Digital Dynamics: Participation, Control and Exclusion, ed. P. Golding and G. Murdock. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hyysalo, S. 2010. Health Technology Development and Use from Practice-Bound Imagination to Evolving Impacts. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. IFPI. 2017. IFPI Global Music Report 2017: Annual State of the Industry. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/news/IFPI-GLOBAL-MUSIC-REPORT-2017.
  26. Jerräng, M. 2009. Documents Reveal Major Labels Own Part of Spotify [online]. Computer Sweden. Available from http://computersweden.idg.se/2.2683/1.240046/documents-reveal-major-labels-own-part-of-spotify. Accessed 28 Feb 2016.
  27. Kelly, K. 1998. New Rules for the New Economy: 10 Ways the Network Economy Is Changing Everything. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  28. Kemp, R. 1994. Technology and the Transition to Environmental Sustainability: The Problem of Technological Regime Shifts. Futures 26 (10): 1023–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kemp, R., J. Schot, and R. Hoogma. 1998. Regime Shifts to Sustainability Through Processes of Niche Formation: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knopper, S. 2009. Appetite for Self-Destruction: The Spectacular Crash of the Record Industry in the Digital Age. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ku, R.S.R. 2002. The Creative Destruction of Copyright: Napster and the New Economics of Digital Technology. The University of Chicago Law Review 69 (1): 263–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leyshon, A. 2001. Time-Space (and Digital) Compression: Software Formats, Musical Networks, and the Reorganisation of the Music Industry. Environment & Planning A 33 (1): 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lie, M., and K.H. Sørensen. 1996. Making Technology Our Own?: Domesticating Technology into Everyday Life. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lynskey, D. 2013. Is Daniel Ek, Spotify Founder, Going to Save the Music Industry … or Destroy It? [online]. The Observer. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/10/daniel-ek-spotify-streaming-music. Accessed 27 Jan 2016.
  35. Mikhalkina, T., and L. Cabantous. 2015. Business Model Innovation: How Iconic Business Model Emerges. Academy of Management Proceedings 1: 12761.Google Scholar
  36. Mulligan, M. 2014a. Tyranny of Choice. Music Industry Blog.Google Scholar
  37. Negroponte, N. 1996. Being Digital. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  38. Nicoll, D.W. 2000. Users as Currency: Technology and Marketing Trials as Naturalistic Environments. The Information Society 16 (4): 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oberholzer-Gee, F., and K. Strumpf. 2007. The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 115 (1): 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Page, W., and E. Gradland. 2009. The Long Tail of P2P, no. 14. PRS for Music.Google Scholar
  41. Peoples, G. 2015. ‘Playola’ Infiltrates Streaming Services: Pay for Play ‘Definitely Happening’ [online]. Billboard. Available from http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/6670475/playola-promotion-streaming-services. Accessed 28 Jan 2016.
  42. Pollock, N. 2009. Software and Organisations: The Biography of the Enterprise-Wide System or How SAP Conquered the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Reia, J. 2014. Napster and Beyond: How Online Music Can Transform the Dynamics of Musical Production and Consumption in DIY Subcultures. First Monday 19 (10). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5552/4131 or http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i10.5552. Accessed 6 Oct 2014.
  44. RIAA. 2007. Who Music Theft Hurts [online]. http://www.riaa.com. Available from http://www.riaa.com//physicalpiracy.php?content_selector=piracy_details_online. Accessed 22 Oct 2015.
  45. Rogers, J. 2013. The Death and Life of the Music Industry in the Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  46. Russell, S. 1986. The Social Construction of Artefacts: A Response to Pinch and Bijker. Social Studies of Science 16 (2): 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shirky, C. 2001. Where Napster Is Taking the Publishing World. Harvard Business Review 79 (2): 143–148.Google Scholar
  48. Silverstone, R., and E. Hirsch. 1992. Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simon, H.A. 1971. Designing Organizations for an Information-Rich World. Computers, Communications, and the Public Interest, 37–72.Google Scholar
  50. Sørensen, K.H. 1996. Learning Technology, Constructing Culture: Socio-Technical Change as Social Learning. Trondheim: University of Trondheim, Centre for Technology and Society, No. 18/96.Google Scholar
  51. Sørensen, K.H., and N. Levold. 1992. Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology. Science, Technology & Human Values 17 (1): 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Spitz, D., and S. Hunter. 2005. Contested Codes: The Social Construction of Napster. Information Society 21 (3): 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sun, H. Forthcoming. Creative Industries Journal (Under Review). Resurgence of Market Control.Google Scholar
  54. Teague, E.J. 2012. Saving the Spotify Revolution: Recalibrating the Power Imbalance in Digital Copyright. Case Western Reserve Journal of Law Technology & Internet 4: 207.Google Scholar
  55. Théberge, P. 2001. ‘Plugged in’: Technology and Popular Music. In The Cambridge Companion to Pop and Rock, ed. S. Frith, W. Straw, and J. Street, 1–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, R. 2000. Public Choices and Social Learning: The New Multimedia Technologies in Europe. The Information Society 16 (4): 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, R., and D. Edge. 1996. The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy 25 (6): 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, R., and N. Pollock. 2012. Research Commentary—Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions. Information Systems Research 23 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, R., J. Stewart, and R. Slack. 2005. Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  60. Zentner, A. 2006. Measuring the Effect of File Sharing on Music Purchases. The Journal of Law & Economics 49 (1): 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zott, C., and R. Amit. 2010. Business Model Design: An Activity System Perspective. Long Range Planning 43 (2): 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyojung Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Creative Industries InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations