Advertisement

Case Study—Spotify

  • Hyojung Sun
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter follows on from the previous chapter’s discussion and provides an in-depth analysis of how Spotify found a solution to the digital recording industry’s financial woe persisted since Napster. It examines how this successful legitimate digital music service innovation arose in the least likely place, Sweden, the hotbed of piracy, and addresses major attributes that brought victory to Spotify over the then seemingly unflinching popularity of P2P file-sharing. I continue the discussion on the changing dynamics brought by Spotify and some of the concerns emerging around this new digital music consumption platform.

References

  1. Aguiar, L., and J. Waldfogel. 2015. Streaming Reaches Flood Stage: Does Spotify Stimulate or Depress Music Sales? Working Paper No. 21653, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. 2009. Free: The Future of a Radical Price. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  3. Bajarin, T. 2015. How Taylor Swift Saved Apple Music. Time.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, K. 2013. Theorizing Music Streaming: Preliminary Investigations. Scottish Music Review 3 (2). Available from http://www.scottishmusicreview.org/index.php/SMR/article/view/40.
  5. Bazalgette, P. 2017. Independent Review of the Creative Industries. GOV.UK.Google Scholar
  6. Bendz, S. 2008. Collaborative Playlists [online]. Spotify News. Available from https://news.spotify.com/uk/2008/01/30/collaborative-playlists/. Accessed 27 Feb 2016.
  7. Bradshaw, T., A. Edgecliffe-Johnson, and Tim Mitchell. 2009. Spotify Wins High-Profile Backing to Expand iTunes Challenge in US. Financial Times, August 4.Google Scholar
  8. Burkitt, D. 2001. Copyrighting Culture-The History and Cultural Specificity of the Western Model of Copyright. Intellectual Property Quarterly 2: 146–186.Google Scholar
  9. Buskirk, E.V. 2013. What Is It About Sweden and Digital Music? We Ask Some Swedes. Evolver.fm.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, D. 2013. The Internet Will Suck All Creative Content Out of the World [online]. The Guardian. Available from https://www.theguardian.com/music/2013/oct/11/david-byrne-internet-content-world. Accessed 31 May 2017.
  11. Constine, J. 2014. Inside the Spotify—Echo Nest Skunkworks. TechCrunch.Google Scholar
  12. Dickey, J. 2014. Taylor Swift Talks Business. Time.Google Scholar
  13. Dredge, S. 2012. Spotify’s Daniel Ek: ‘We Want Artists to Be Able to Afford to Create the Music They Want to Create’. The Guardian, December 6.Google Scholar
  14. Dredge, S. 2013a. Spotify Launches Artist Spotlight Feature with Haim and Lorde [online]. Musically. Available from http://musically.com/2013/10/01/spotify-launches-artist-spotlight-feature-with-haim-and-lorde/. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
  15. Dredge, S. 2013b. Thom Yorke Calls Spotify ‘the Last Desperate Fart of a Dying Corpse’. The Guardian, October 7.Google Scholar
  16. Dredge, S. 2013c. Billy Bragg: Labels Not Spotify Deserve Streaming Music Payouts Scrutiny. The Guardian, November 7.Google Scholar
  17. Dredge, S. 2014. Musician Zoe Keating Reveals iTunes, Spotify and YouTube Payouts for 2013. The Guardian, February 24.Google Scholar
  18. ECSA. 2015. ECSA Position Paper—What Music Creators Want—ECSA-Composer Alliance [online]. European Composer & Songwriter Alliance. Available from http://composeralliance.org/ecsa-position-paper-what-music-creators-want/. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
  19. Ek, D. 2011. Say Hello to Spotify Apps. Spotify News.Google Scholar
  20. Erickson, K. 2015. Five Things to Understand About That Spotify Contract Leak [online]. Future of Music Coalition. Available from http://www.futureofmusic.org/blog/2015/05/27/five-things-understand-about-spotify-contract-leak. Accessed 25 Aug 2015.
  21. Flanagan, A. 2014. YouTube Re-negotiating with Indies Following Outcry [online]. Billboard. Available from http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/digital-and-mobile/6150292/youtube-re-negotiating-with-indies-following-outcry. Accessed 12 July 2014.
  22. Frith, S. 2002. Music and Everyday Life. Critical Quarterly 44 (1): 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ghafele, R. 2014. Europe’s Lost Royalty Opportunity: A Comparison of Potential and Existing Digital Music Royalty Markets in Ten Different EU Member States. Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues 11 (2): 60–91.Google Scholar
  24. Ginsburg, J.C. 2001. Copyright and Control Over New Technologies of Dissemination. Columbia Law Review 101 (7): 1613–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halmenschlager, C., and P. Waelbroeck. 2014. Fighting Free with Free: Freemium vs. Piracy. Available from SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract=2475641 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2475641.
  26. Hirschhorn, J. 2015. Less Money, Mo’ Music & Lots of Problems: A Look at the Music Biz [online]. Available from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/less-money-mo-music-lots-problems-look-biz-jason-hirschhorn. Accessed 22 Jun 2017.
  27. IFPI. 2009. Digital Music Report 2009: New Business Models for a Changing Environment. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2009.pdf.
  28. IFPI. 2010. Digital Music Report 2010: Music How, When, and Where You Want It. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/DMR2010.pdf.
  29. IFPI. 2013. Digital Music Report 2013: Engine of a Digital World. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/downloads/dmr2013-full-report_english.pdf.
  30. IFPI. 2015. Digital Music Report 2015: Charting the Path to Sustainable Growth. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/downloads/Digital-Music-Report-2015.pdf.
  31. IFPI. 2017. IFPI Global Music Report 2017: Annual State of the Industry. Available from http://www.ifpi.org/news/IFPI-GLOBAL-MUSIC-REPORT-2017.
  32. International Intellectual Property Alliance. 2006. International Intellectual Property Alliance 2006 Special 301 Special Mention Sweden. International Intellectual Property Alliance.Google Scholar
  33. Jerräng, M. 2009. Documents Reveal Major Labels Own Part of Spotify [online]. Computer Sweden. Available from http://computersweden.idg.se/2.2683/1.240046/documents-reveal-major-labels-own-part-of-spotify. Accessed 28 Feb 2016.
  34. Jozuka, E. 2014. Last Fugitive Pirate Bay Member Arrested [online]. Wired UK. Available from http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-11/04/last-fugitive-member-of-pirate-bay-arrested. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
  35. Katz, C. 2013. Music for Everyone. Now Free on Your Mobile. Spotify Blog. December 11.Google Scholar
  36. King, J. 2007. Steal This Film. Artefact Films.Google Scholar
  37. Kreitz, G., and F. Niemela. 2010. Spotify–Large Scale, Low Latency, P2P Music-on-Demand Streaming. 2010 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computing (P2P), 1–10.Google Scholar
  38. Lalonde, P.-E. 2014. Study Concerning Fair Compensation for Music Creators in the Digital Age [online]. CIAM. Available from http://www.songwriters.ca/studyconcerningfaircompensation2014.aspx. Accessed 2 Aug 2015.
  39. Larsson, S. 2011. The Path Dependence of European Copyright. SCRIPT-ed 8 (1): 8–31.Google Scholar
  40. Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lewen, Ulric M. 2008. Internet File-sharing: Swedish Pirates Challenge the U.S. Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law 16 (1): 173–206.Google Scholar
  42. Lynskey, D. 2013. Is Daniel Ek, Spotify Founder, Going to Save the Music Industry … or Destroy It? [online]. The Observer. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/nov/10/daniel-ek-spotify-streaming-music. Accessed 27 Jan 2016.
  43. Mäntymäki, M., and A.K.M.N. Islam. 2015. Gratifications from Using Freemium Music Streaming Services: Differences Between Basic and Premium Users. In ICIS 2015 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  44. Mulligan, M. 2014. Tyranny of Choice. Music Industry Blog.Google Scholar
  45. Mulligan, M. 2016. Cross Border Listening: Borderless Hits and Curated Playlists. MIDiA Research.Google Scholar
  46. Music Managers Forum. 2016. Dissecting The Digital Dollar. CMU Insights.Google Scholar
  47. Nicolaou, A. 2017. Taylor Swift Changes Her Tune and Returns to Spotify. Financial Times, June 9.Google Scholar
  48. Page, W. 2013. Adventures in the Netherlands: New Spotify Study Sees Encouraging Downwards Trend in Music Piracy in the Netherlands. Spotify Press.Google Scholar
  49. Palmås, K., J. Andersson Schwarz, and S. Larsson. 2014. The Liability of Politicalness: Legitimacy and Legality in Piracy-Proximate Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business 22 (4): 408–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peacock, A.T., and R.B. Weir. 1975. The Composer in the Market Place. London: Faber Music.Google Scholar
  51. Pelly, L. 2017. The Secret Lives of Playlists [online]. WATT. Available from https://watt.cashmusic.org/writing/thesecretlivesofplaylists. Accessed 24 Aug 2017.
  52. Peoples, G. 2013. Spotify Throws Its Weight Behind Artist Marketing [online]. Billboard. Available from http://www.billboard.com/biz/articles/news/digital-and-mobile/5740703/spotify-throws-its-weight-behind-artist-marketing. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
  53. Peterson, R.A., and R.M. Kern. 1996. Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore. American Sociological Review 61 (5): 900–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pollack, N. 2010. Spotify Is the Coolest Music Service You Can’t Use. Wired.Google Scholar
  55. Poort, J., J. Leenheer, J. van der Ham, and C. Dumitru. 2014. Baywatch: Two Approaches to Measure the Effects of Blocking Access to The Pirate Bay. Telecommunications Policy 38 (4): 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rethink Music. 2015. Fair Music: Transparency and Payment Flows in the Music Industry [online]. Rethink Music. Available from http://www.rethink-music.com/research/fair-music-transparency-and-payment-flows-in-the-music-industry. Accessed 15 Aug 2015.
  57. Roberts, R. 2011. Critic’s Notebook: With Spotify, the Future of Music Is Here. LA Times Blogs—Pop & Hiss.Google Scholar
  58. Rogers, J. 2013. The Death and Life of the Music Industry in the Digital Age. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  59. Schwarz, J.A. 2014. Online File Sharing Innovations in Media Consumption. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Sisario, B. 2014. Beats Music Enters Online Streaming Market—The New York Times [online]. Available from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/12/arts/music/beats-music-enters-online-streaming-market.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2016.
  61. Smith, C. 2014. How Spotify, Netflix and Amazon Control Your Online Habits [online]. TechRadar. Available from http://www.techradar.com/us/news/internet/how-spotify-netflix-and-amazon-s-powerful-discovery-tools-control-our-habits-1216211. Accessed 18 Feb 2016.
  62. Spotify. 2013. Spotify Explained [online]. Spotify for Artists. Available from http://www.spotifyartists.com/spotify-explained/. Accessed 28 Feb 2016.
  63. Spotify. 2014. Spotify Acquires the Echo Nest. Spotify Press.Google Scholar
  64. Spotify. 2017. Fast Facts—Spotify. Spotify Press.Google Scholar
  65. Stanford’s Entrepreneurship Corner. 2014. Stanford’s Entrepreneurship Corner: Daniel Ek, Spotify. Available from http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=2964. Accessed 28 June 2018.
  66. Sun, H. 2018. The Times They Are a-Changin’: Digital Music Value in Transition from Piracy to Streaming. In Digital Piracy: A Global, Multidisciplinary Account, ed. S.C. Brown and T.J. Holt. Arbington, Oxon and New York.Google Scholar
  67. Sun, H. Forthcoming. Creative Industries Journal (Under Review). Resurgence of Market Control.Google Scholar
  68. Teague, E.J. 2012. Saving the Spotify Revolution: Recalibrating the Power Imbalance in Digital Copyright. Case Western Reserve Journal of Law Technology & Internet 4: 207.Google Scholar
  69. Tepper, S.J., and E. Hargittai. 2009. Pathways to Music Exploration in a Digital Age. Poetics 37 (3): 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tschmuck, P. 2015. Music Streaming Revisited—The Problem of Income Distribution [online]. Music Business Research. Available from https://musicbusinessresearch.wordpress.com/2015/07/18/music-streaming-revisited-the-problem-of-income-distribution/. Accessed 21 Jun 2017.
  71. UK Intellectual Property Office. 2017. Online Copyright Infringement Tracker Survey (7th Wave)—GOV.UK [online]. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-copyright-infringement-tracker-survey-7th-wave. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  72. Vaidhyanathan, S. 2001. Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Wlömert, N., and D. Papies. 2016. On-Demand Streaming Services and Music Industry Revenues—Insights from Spotify’s Market Entry. International Journal of Research in Marketing 33 (2): 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyojung Sun
    • 1
  1. 1.Creative Industries InstituteUlster UniversityBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations