Advertisement

On the Economic Returns of Eco-Innovation: Where Do We Stand?

  • Claudia GhisettiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

Abstract

The aim of the Chapter is to provide an overview on where we stand in terms of research and main findings on eco-innovations and their economic effects. Many theoretical and empirical contributions have tried to answer the question “Does it pay to be green?”, and a variety of heterogeneous answers have been given to date. For instance, it is found to depend on who gets rewards, on where it can pay, on how it pays and on the typologies of innovations under scrutiny.

The Chapter summarizes the available contributions assessing the economic performance effects of improvements in the environmental performances at various levels of analysis. Economic performance is either conceived through short-term measures, such as profitability, or longer term competitiveness measures, such as productivity. Later, it provides new empirical evidence on economic effects of eco-innovations using panel data from the Community Innovation Surveys on selected European countries and sectors.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author wishes to thank Klaus Rennings for the great contribution he gave to this scientific community and, personally, for the precious knowledge share and interactions he held with the author. The work has been done while the author worked at the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication.

References

  1. Al-Tuwaijri, S., Christensen, T., & Ii, K. H. (2004). The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: A simultaneous equations approach. Accounting Organizations and Society, 29, 447–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambec, S., Lanoie, P., Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amores-Salvadó, J., Castro, G. M., & Navas-López, J. E. (2014). Green corporate image: Moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 356–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antonietti, R., & Marzucchi, A. (2014). Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. Ecological Economics, 108, 150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbieri, N., Ghisetti, C., Gilli, M., Marin, G., & Nicolli, F. (2016). A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 596–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). 11 Postcards from the edge. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 513–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Zoboli, R. (2011). Environmentally-oriented innovative strategies and firm performances in services: Micro evidence from Italy. International Review of Applied Economics, 25(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng, C. C., Yang, C. L., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: A Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (1999). Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. European Environment, 9, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobb, C. W., & Douglas, P. H. (1928). A theory of production. American Economic Review, 18(sup), 139–165.Google Scholar
  12. Consoli, D., Marin, G., Marzucchi, A., & Vona, F. (2016). Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital? Research Policy, 45(5), 1046–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cordeiro, J. J., & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: Evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 6(2), 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costantini, V., & Crespi, F. (2008). Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics, 66(2–3), 447–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costantini, V., & Mazzanti, M. (2012). On the green and innovative side of trade competitiveness ? The impact of environmental policies and innovation on EU exports. Research Policy, 41(1), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis at the firm level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2), 115–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elsayed, K., & Paton, D. (2005). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Static and dynamic panel data evidence. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Endrikat, J., Guenther, E., & Hoppe, H. (2014). Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: A meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. European Management Journal, 32(5), 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franco, C., & Marin, G. (2017). The effect of within-sector, upstream and downstream environmental taxes on innovation and productivity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(2), 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freedman, M., & Jaggi, B. (1992). An investigation of the long-run relationship between pollution performance and economic performance: The case of pulp and paper firms. Critical Perspectives Account, 3(4), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gagliardi, L., Marin, G., & Miriello, C. (2016). The greener the better? Job creation effects of environmentally-friendly technological change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 25(5), 779–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghisetti, C. (2017). Demand-pull and environmental innovations: Estimating the effects of innovative public procurement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 125, 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ghisetti, C., & Pontoni, F. (2015). Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 118, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ghisetti, C., & Rennings, K. (2014). Environmental innovations and profitability: How does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenstone, M., List, J., & Syverson, C. (2012). The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing (NBERWorking Paper n. 18392). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  28. Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: Strategies for a sustainable world. Harvard Business Review, 75, 66–76.Google Scholar
  30. Hart, S., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1996), 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of Management, 37, 1464–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, S., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(2), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Horbach, J. (2010). The impact of innovation activities on employment in the environmental sector – Empirical results for Germany at the firm level. Jahrbucher Fur Nationalokonomie Und Statistik, 230(4), 403–419.Google Scholar
  34. Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2013). Environmental innovation and employment dynamics in different technology fi elds e an analysis based on the German Community Innovation Survey 2009. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact—The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Horváthová, E. (2010). Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 70(1), 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ILO. (2013) Methodologies for assessing green jobs (Policy Brief). International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  38. Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaffe, A. B., Newell, R. G., & Stavins, R. N. (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54(2–3), 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5(1), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kunapatarawong, R., & Martínez-Ros, E. (2016). Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment? Research Policy, 45(6), 1218–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leoncini, R., Marzucchi, A., Montresor, S., Rentocchini, F., & Rizzo, U. (2017). ‘Better late than never’: The interplay between green technology and age for firm growth. Small Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9939-6 (Online first).
  45. Li, Y. (2014). Environmental innovation practices and performance: Moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 66, 450–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Licht, G., & Peters, B. (2013). The impact of green innovation on employment growth in Europe, WWWforEurope (Working Paper No 50).Google Scholar
  47. Manello, A. (2017). Productivity growth, environmental regulation and win–win opportunities: The case of chemical industry in Italy and Germany. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(2), 733–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marin, G. (2014). Do eco-innovations harm productivity growth through crowding out? Results of an extended CDM model for Italy. Research Policy, 43(2), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marin, G., & Lotti, F. (2017). Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents. Industrial and Corporate Change, 26(1), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marin, G., Marzucchi, A., & Zoboli, R. (2015). SMEs and barriers to Eco-innovation in the EU: Exploring different firm profiles. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 25(3), 671–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374–2383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1480–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miroshnychenko, I., Barontini, R., & Testa, F. (2017). Green practices and financial performance: A global outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 340–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. OECD. (2014). Issue note addressing social implications of green growth: Inclusive labour markets for green growth. (Green Growth and Sustainable Development Forum). 13–14 November 2014.Google Scholar
  56. Orlitzky, M., Siegel, D., & Waldman, D. (2011). Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Business & Society, 50(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peneder, M., Arvanitis, S., Rammer, C., Stucki, T., & Wörter, M. (2017). Competitiveness and ecological impacts of green energy technologies firm-level evidence for the DACH region Michael (WIFO Working Paper Series 544/2017).Google Scholar
  58. Popp, D., Newell, R. G., & Jaffe, A. B. (2010). Energy, the environment, and technological change. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (Vol. 2, pp. 873–937). Burlington, NJ: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–68.Google Scholar
  60. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.Google Scholar
  61. Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rexhäuser, S., & Rammer, C. (2013). Environmental innovations and firm profitability: Unmasking the porter hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(1), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Riillo, C. A. F. (2017). Beyond the question “Does it pay to be green?”: How much green? and when? Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 626–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Russo, M., & Fouts, P. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.Google Scholar
  67. Salama, A. (2005). A note on the impact of environmental performance on financial performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sarkis, J., & Cordeiro, J. J. (2001). An empirical evaluation of environmental efficiencies and firm performance: Pollution prevention versus end-of-pipe practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Soltmann, C., Stucki, T., & Woerter, M. (2014). The impact of environmentally friendly innovations on value added. Environmental and Resource Economics, 62(3), 457–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Telle, K. (2006). “It pays to be green” – A premature conclusion? Environmental and Resource Economics, 35(3), 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vona, F., Marin, G., Consoli, D., & Popp, D. (2018). Environmental regulation and green skills: An empirical exploration. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.  https://doi.org/10.1086/698859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2002). The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 146, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wooldridge, J. M. (2001). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Commission, DG Joint Research Centre, Unit I.1, Modelling, Indicators & Impact EvaluationIspraItaly

Personalised recommendations