Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Innovation Systems: An Integrated TIS-MLP Approach for Wind Turbines
Meeting sustainability challenges requires not only innovations but also transitions to sustainability paths. Studies applying technological innovation system and multi-level perspective approaches show that the development of innovation systems is a complex process with numerous direct and indirect interdependencies of the different variables involved. This paper looks at how a combined TIS-MLP approach could form the conceptual basis for analyzing the dynamics driving the development of the innovation system. The feasibility of applying such a concept is demonstrated for the three different phases of the Chinese wind energy innovation system. There were feedback loops between the innovation functions, which describe the internal dynamics. The landscape is important for starting positive cycles. Situational context factors and general paradigms of economic strategies, such as the importance of developing domestic production capacities supported by local content requirement and building on the absorption of foreign knowledge, are important framework conditions. So far, there are no signs of a strong negative feedback loop developing for China, so the system is expected to continue to expand.
KeywordsSustainability transitions System dynamics Wind energy Technological innovation systems Multi-level perspective
This chapter draws on research performed within the SINCERE project. The financial contribution of the German DFG is acknowledged.
- Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2008a). Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying system building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In T. Foxon, J. Köhler, & C. Oughton (Eds.), Innovations in low-carbon economy (pp. 79–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Dai, Y., Zhou, Y., Xia, D., Ding, M., & Xue, L. (2014). Innovation paths in the Chinese wind power industry. Draft discussion paper of GDI, Bonn.Google Scholar
- Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gandenberger, C. (2017). Giant and Dwarf – China’s two faces in wind energy innovation. Working paper sustainability and innovation no. S 07/2017, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
- Gandenberger, C., & Strauch, M. (2017). Wind energy technology as opportunity for catching-up? A comparison of the TIS in Brazil and China. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Koch-Weser, I., & Meick, E. (2015). China’s wind and solar sectors: Trends in deployment, manufacturing, and energy policy. Staff Report, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, March 9th 2015, Washington.Google Scholar
- Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differ across sectors. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 308–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Markard, J. (2010). Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change. Eawag – Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf.Google Scholar
- Schmitz, H., & Lema, R. (2015). The global green economy: Competition or cooperation between Europe and China? In J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius, & B. R. Martin (Eds.), The triple challenge for Europe economic development, climate change, and governance (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sterman, J. (2001). Business dynamics: Systems thinking for a complex world. Boston: Irwin.Google Scholar
- Suurs, R. A. A., & Hekkert, M. (2009). Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. TFSC, 76, 1003–1020.Google Scholar