Advertisement

Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Innovation Systems: An Integrated TIS-MLP Approach for Wind Turbines

  • Rainer WalzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)

Abstract

Meeting sustainability challenges requires not only innovations but also transitions to sustainability paths. Studies applying technological innovation system and multi-level perspective approaches show that the development of innovation systems is a complex process with numerous direct and indirect interdependencies of the different variables involved. This paper looks at how a combined TIS-MLP approach could form the conceptual basis for analyzing the dynamics driving the development of the innovation system. The feasibility of applying such a concept is demonstrated for the three different phases of the Chinese wind energy innovation system. There were feedback loops between the innovation functions, which describe the internal dynamics. The landscape is important for starting positive cycles. Situational context factors and general paradigms of economic strategies, such as the importance of developing domestic production capacities supported by local content requirement and building on the absorption of foreign knowledge, are important framework conditions. So far, there are no signs of a strong negative feedback loop developing for China, so the system is expected to continue to expand.

Keywords

Sustainability transitions System dynamics Wind energy Technological innovation systems Multi-level perspective 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter draws on research performed within the SINCERE project. The financial contribution of the German DFG is acknowledged.

References

  1. Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2008a). Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying system building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In T. Foxon, J. Köhler, & C. Oughton (Eds.), Innovations in low-carbon economy (pp. 79–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. (2008b). ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive external economies’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008c). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binz, C., Gosens, J., Hansen, T., & Hansen, U. E. (2017). Toward technology-sensitive catching-up policies: Insights from renewable energy in China. World Development, 96, 418–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlsson, B., et al. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai, Y., Zhou, Y., Xia, D., Ding, M., & Xue, L. (2014). Innovation paths in the Chinese wind power industry. Draft discussion paper of GDI, Bonn.Google Scholar
  7. Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gandenberger, C. (2017). Giant and Dwarf – China’s two faces in wind energy innovation. Working paper sustainability and innovation no. S 07/2017, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  10. Gandenberger, C., & Strauch, M. (2017). Wind energy technology as opportunity for catching-up? A comparison of the TIS in Brazil and China. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  11. Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Geels, F. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 43, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gosens, J., & Lu, Y. (2013). From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power. Energy Policy, 60, 234–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosens, J., & Lu, Y. (2014). Prospects for global market expansion of China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 67, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hekkert, M., et al. (2007). Functions of an innovation system: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klagge, B., Liu, Z., & Campos Silva, P. (2012). Constructing China’s wind energy innovation system. Energy Policy, 50, 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koch-Weser, I., & Meick, E. (2015). China’s wind and solar sectors: Trends in deployment, manufacturing, and energy policy. Staff Report, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, March 9th 2015, Washington.Google Scholar
  21. Lema, R., & Lema, A. (2012). Technology transfer? The rise of China and India in green technology sectors. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lema, R., Iizuka, M., & Walz, R. (2015). Low carbon innovation and development. Innovation and Development, 5(2), 173–187.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2015.1065096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lundvall, B. A., et al. (2002). National systems of production, innovation, and competence building. Research Policy, 32, 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differ across sectors. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 308–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Markard, J. (2010). Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change. Eawag – Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf.Google Scholar
  26. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohamad, Z. (2011). The emergence of fuel cell technology and challenges to latecomer countries: Insights from Singapore and Malaysia. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 5(3), 306–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ru, P., Zhi, Q., Zhang, F., Zhong, X., Li, J., & Su, J. (2012). Behind the development of technology: The transition of innovation modes in China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 43, 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schleich, J., Walz, R., & Ragwitz, M. (2017). Effects of policies on patenting in wind-power technologies. Energy Policy, 108, 684–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schmitz, H., & Lema, R. (2015). The global green economy: Competition or cooperation between Europe and China? In J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius, & B. R. Martin (Eds.), The triple challenge for Europe economic development, climate change, and governance (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39, 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sterman, J. (2001). Business dynamics: Systems thinking for a complex world. Boston: Irwin.Google Scholar
  36. Suurs, R. A. A., & Hekkert, M. (2009). Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. TFSC, 76, 1003–1020.Google Scholar
  37. Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walrave, B., & Raven, R. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Research Policy, 45(9), 1833–1844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walz, R. (2007). The role of regulation for sustainable infrastructure innovations: The case of wind energy. International Journal of Public Policy, 2(1/2), 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walz, R., & Köhler, J. (2014). Using lead market factors to assess the potential for a sustainability transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 10, 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walz, R., & Nowak Delgado, J. (2012). Innovation in sustainability technologies in newly industrializing countries – Results from a case study on wind energy. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, Z., Qin, H., & Lewis, J. (2012). China’s wind power industry: Policy support, technological achievements, and emerging challenges. Energy Policy, 51, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Weber, M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang, S., Andrews-Speed, P., & Zhao, X. (2013). Political and institutional analysis of the successes and failures of China’s wind power policy. Energy Policy, 56, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao, X., Wang, F., & Wang, M. (2012). Large-scale utilization of wind power in China: Obstacles of conflict between market and planning. Energy Policy, 48, 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zheng, H., Wang, J., Byrne, J., & Kurdgelashvili, L. (2013). Review of wind power tariff policies in China. Energy Policy, 53, 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Competence Center Sustainability & Infrastructure SystemsFraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISIKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations