Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Innovation Systems: An Integrated TIS-MLP Approach for Wind Turbines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover New Developments in Eco-Innovation Research

Part of the book series: Sustainability and Innovation ((SUSTAINABILITY))

  • 944 Accesses

Abstract

Meeting sustainability challenges requires not only innovations but also transitions to sustainability paths. Studies applying technological innovation system and multi-level perspective approaches show that the development of innovation systems is a complex process with numerous direct and indirect interdependencies of the different variables involved. This paper looks at how a combined TIS-MLP approach could form the conceptual basis for analyzing the dynamics driving the development of the innovation system. The feasibility of applying such a concept is demonstrated for the three different phases of the Chinese wind energy innovation system. There were feedback loops between the innovation functions, which describe the internal dynamics. The landscape is important for starting positive cycles. Situational context factors and general paradigms of economic strategies, such as the importance of developing domestic production capacities supported by local content requirement and building on the absorption of foreign knowledge, are important framework conditions. So far, there are no signs of a strong negative feedback loop developing for China, so the system is expected to continue to expand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., & Jacobsson, S. (2008a). Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying system building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers. In T. Foxon, J. Köhler, & C. Oughton (Eds.), Innovations in low-carbon economy (pp. 79–111). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., & Sandén, B. (2008b). ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive external economies’: Two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 575–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008c). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binz, C., Gosens, J., Hansen, T., & Hansen, U. E. (2017). Toward technology-sensitive catching-up policies: Insights from renewable energy in China. World Development, 96, 418–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., et al. (2002). Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy, 31, 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, Y., Zhou, Y., Xia, D., Ding, M., & Xue, L. (2014). Innovation paths in the Chinese wind power industry. Draft discussion paper of GDI, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy, 11, 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. (2005). Systems of innovation: Perspectives and challenges. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 181–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandenberger, C. (2017). Giant and Dwarf – China’s two faces in wind energy innovation. Working paper sustainability and innovation no. S 07/2017, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandenberger, C., & Strauch, M. (2017). Wind energy technology as opportunity for catching-up? A comparison of the TIS in Brazil and China. Innovation and Development, 8(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 43, 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosens, J., & Lu, Y. (2013). From lagging to leading? Technological innovation systems in emerging economies and the case of Chinese wind power. Energy Policy, 60, 234–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosens, J., & Lu, Y. (2014). Prospects for global market expansion of China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 67, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2009). Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: Empirical evidence for earlier claims. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(4), 584–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, M., et al. (2007). Functions of an innovation system: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klagge, B., Liu, Z., & Campos Silva, P. (2012). Constructing China’s wind energy innovation system. Energy Policy, 50, 370–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch-Weser, I., & Meick, E. (2015). China’s wind and solar sectors: Trends in deployment, manufacturing, and energy policy. Staff Report, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, March 9th 2015, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lema, R., & Lema, A. (2012). Technology transfer? The rise of China and India in green technology sectors. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 23–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lema, R., Iizuka, M., & Walz, R. (2015). Low carbon innovation and development. Innovation and Development, 5(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2015.1065096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A., et al. (2002). National systems of production, innovation, and competence building. Research Policy, 32, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems: How and why innovation differ across sectors. In J. Fagerberg et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 308–406). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J. (2010). Transformation of infrastructures: Sector characteristics and implications for fundamental change. Eawag – Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41, 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad, Z. (2011). The emergence of fuel cell technology and challenges to latecomer countries: Insights from Singapore and Malaysia. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 5(3), 306–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ru, P., Zhi, Q., Zhang, F., Zhong, X., Li, J., & Su, J. (2012). Behind the development of technology: The transition of innovation modes in China’s wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 43, 58–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleich, J., Walz, R., & Ragwitz, M. (2017). Effects of policies on patenting in wind-power technologies. Energy Policy, 108, 684–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H., & Lema, R. (2015). The global green economy: Competition or cooperation between Europe and China? In J. Fagerberg, S. Laestadius, & B. R. Martin (Eds.), The triple challenge for Europe economic development, climate change, and governance (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., Voß, J. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39, 435–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. (2001). Business dynamics: Systems thinking for a complex world. Boston: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suurs, R. A. A., & Hekkert, M. (2009). Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands. TFSC, 76, 1003–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walrave, B., & Raven, R. (2016). Modelling the dynamics of technological innovation systems. Research Policy, 45(9), 1833–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R. (2007). The role of regulation for sustainable infrastructure innovations: The case of wind energy. International Journal of Public Policy, 2(1/2), 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R., & Köhler, J. (2014). Using lead market factors to assess the potential for a sustainability transition. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 10, 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R., & Nowak Delgado, J. (2012). Innovation in sustainability technologies in newly industrializing countries – Results from a case study on wind energy. Innovation and Development, 2(1), 87–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Qin, H., & Lewis, J. (2012). China’s wind power industry: Policy support, technological achievements, and emerging challenges. Energy Policy, 51, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Rohracher, H. (2012). Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Andrews-Speed, P., & Zhao, X. (2013). Political and institutional analysis of the successes and failures of China’s wind power policy. Energy Policy, 56, 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Wang, F., & Wang, M. (2012). Large-scale utilization of wind power in China: Obstacles of conflict between market and planning. Energy Policy, 48, 222–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, H., Wang, J., Byrne, J., & Kurdgelashvili, L. (2013). Review of wind power tariff policies in China. Energy Policy, 53, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter draws on research performed within the SINCERE project. The financial contribution of the German DFG is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Competence Center Sustainability & Infrastructure Systems, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Rainer Walz

Authors
  1. Rainer Walz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Walz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business, Augsburg University of Applied Sciences, Augsburg, Germany

    Jens Horbach

  2. Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany

    Christiane Reif

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walz, R. (2018). Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Innovation Systems: An Integrated TIS-MLP Approach for Wind Turbines. In: Horbach, J., Reif, C. (eds) New Developments in Eco-Innovation Research. Sustainability and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93019-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation