New Developments in Eco-Innovation Research: Aim of the Book and Overview of the Different Chapters

  • Jens HorbachEmail author
  • Christiane Reif
Part of the Sustainability and Innovation book series (SUSTAINABILITY)


Eco-innovations are crucial for reducing the environmental damages arising from economic activities, and are one of the main drivers of a successful transition towards sustainable development and remedying essential climate change problems. This book provides an overview of recent advances in the rapidly growing field of eco-innovation research, adopts an interdisciplinary perspective and outlines the main future developmental trends. A broad range of topics are addressed, including a bibliometric analysis of eco-innovation research, the relationship between eco-innovation and corporate sustainability, eco-innovation system analysis, new evidence on the economic effects of eco-innovation, and the relevance of policy and policy mixes for eco-innovation activities. The book is dedicated to Klaus Rennings, one of the most important representatives of this field, who unexpectedly passed away in September 2015.


  1. Ambec, S., & Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbieri, N., Ghisetti, C., Gilli, M., & Nicolli, F. (2016). A survey of the literature on environmental innovation based on main path analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30, 596–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkhout, F. (2011). Eco-innovation: Reflections on an evolving research agenda. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(3/4), 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrás, S., & Edquist, C. (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (1999). Determinants of environmental product and process innovation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 9(5), 191–201.Google Scholar
  6. De Brito, M. P., Carbone, V., & Blanquart, C. M. (2008). Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(2), 534–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2011). Stimulating different types of eco-innovation in the UK: Government policies and firm motivations. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1546–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driessen, P., & Hillebrand, B. (2002). Adoption and diffusion of green innovations. In G. C. Bartels & W. J. A. Nelissen (Eds.), Marketing for sustainability: Towards transactional policy-making (pp. 343–355). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  9. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ghisetti, C., & Pontoni, F. (2015). Investigating policy and R&D effects on environmental innovation: A meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 118, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horbach, J. (2005). Methodological aspects of an indicator system for sustainable innovation. In J. Horbach (Ed.), Indicator systems for sustainable innovation. Sustainability and innovation (pp. 1–19). Heidelberg: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation – New evidence from German panel data sources. Research Policy, 37, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horbach, J. (2016). Empirical determinants of eco-innovation in European countries using the community innovation survey. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 19, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horbach, J. (2018). Determinants of eco-innovation at the firm level. In F. Boons & A. McMeekin (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar forthcoming.Google Scholar
  15. Horbach, J., Rammer, C., & Rennings, K. (2012). Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact – The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Economics, 78, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hull, C. E., & Rothenberg, S. (2008). Firm performance: The interactions of corporate social performance with innovation and industry differentiation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(7), 781–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kemp, R. (2010). Eco-innovation: Definition, measurement and open research issues. Economia Politica, 27, 397–420.Google Scholar
  18. Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2008). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. Maastricht. Accessed March, 2018, from
  19. Khanna, M., Deltas, G., & Harrington, D. R. (2009). Adoption of pollution prevention techniques: The role of management systems and regulatory pressures. Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2013). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klewitz, J., Zeyen, A., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Intermediaries driving eco-innovation in SMEs: A qualitative investigation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(4), 442–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magro, E., & Wilson, J. R. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), 1647–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Ann Arbor, 1001, 48109–41234. Scholar
  25. Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, 102, 27.Google Scholar
  28. OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Accessed March, 2018, from
  29. OECD. (2010). The innovation policy mix. In OECD science, technology and industry outlook 2010 (pp. 251–279). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orsato, R. (2009). Sustainability strategies: When does it pay to be green? (1st ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan, INSEAD Business Press XXV–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng, X., & Liu, Y. (2016). Behind eco-innovation: Managerial environmental awareness and external resource acquisition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rehfeld, K. M., Rennings, K., & Ziegler, A. (2007). Integrated product policy and environmental product innovations: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics, 61, 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rexhäuser, S., & Rammer, C. (2014). Environmental innovations and firm profitability: Unmasking the porter hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 57(1), 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rogge, K. S., Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2017). Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, M., & Crotty, J. (2008). Environmental regulation and innovation driving ecological design in the UK automotive industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(6), 341–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondéjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics, 92, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations, General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, (A/RES/70/1).Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, M. (2007). On the relationship between environmental management, environmental innovation and patenting: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 36(10), 1587–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wagner, M. (2008). Empirical influence of environmental management on innovation: Evidence from Europe. Ecological Economics, 66(2–3), 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987), Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. London. Accessed March, 2018, from
  46. Ziegler, A., & Nogareda, J. S. (2009). Environmental management systems and technological environmental innovations: Exploring the causal relationship. Research Policy, 38(5), 885–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of BusinessAugsburg University of Applied SciencesAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW)MannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations