Skip to main content

Dynamic Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: The Recursive Nash Bargaining Solution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 720 Accesses

Part of the book series: Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications ((SDGTFA))

Abstract

Grim trigger strategies can support any set of control paths as a cooperative equilibrium, if they yield at least the value of the noncooperative Nash equilibrium. We introduce the recursive Nash bargaining solution as an equilibrium selection device and study its properties by means of an analytically tractable n-person differential game. The idea is that the agents bargain over a tuple of stationary Markovian strategies, before the game has started. It is shown that under symmetry the bargaining solution yields efficient controls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Yeung and Petrosyan [9] for a recent treatment on subgame consistent cooperation in differential games.

  2. 2.

    Wirl [8] showed that within the set of nonlinear Markovian strategies the Nash equilibrium is nonunique and that the efficient steady state is potentially reachable.

  3. 3.

    See also Dockner et al. [1, Ch. 9.5] for a textbook treatment.

  4. 4.

    The latter assumption is not too prohibitive. If payoffs were not transferable the individual cooperative value is simply given by \(C_i(x_t) = J_i(\hat u(s), t)\) where \(\hat u(s)\) are the Pareto efficient controls. It turns out that in the symmetric setup \(C_i(x_t) = \frac {C(x_t)}{n}\) which would also be the result under an equal sharing rule with transferable payoffs.

  5. 5.

    See e.g. Dockner et al. [1, Ch. 4] for the theory on noncooperative differential games.

  6. 6.

    See also Dockner et al. [1, Ch. 6].

  7. 7.

    Agreeability is a stronger notion than time consistency. In the former the agreement payoff dominates the noncooperative play for any state while in the latter only along the cooperative path. Time consistency was introduced by Petrosjan [5] (originally 1977) and agreeability by Kaitala and Pohjola [3]. See also Zaccour [10] for a tutorial on cooperative differential games.

References

  1. Dockner, E.J., Jørgensen, S., Long, N.V., Sorger, G.: Differential Games in Economics and Management Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Fershtman, C., Nitzan, S.: Dynamic voluntary provision of public goods. Eur. Econ. Rev. 35, 1057–1067 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaitala, V., Pohjola, M.: Economic development and agreeable redistribution in capitalism: efficient game equilibria in a two-class neoclassical growth model. Int. Econ. Rev. 31(2), 421–438 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nash, J.F., Jr.: The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18(2), 155–162 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Petrosjan, L.A.: Agreeable solutions in differential games. Int. J. Math. Game Theory Algebra 2–3, 165–177 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorger, G.: Recursive Nash bargaining over a productive asset. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 30(12), 2637–2659 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Tolwinski, B, Haurie, A., Leitmann, G.: Cooperative equilibria in differential games. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 119(1–2), 182–202 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Wirl, F.: Dynamic voluntary provision of public goods: extension to nonlinear strategies. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 12, 555–560 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeung, D.W.K., Petrosyan, L.A.: Subgame Consistent Cooperation. Springer, Singapore (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaccour, G.: Time consistency in cooperative differential games: a tutorial. Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. (INFOR) 46(1), 81–92 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Mark Schopf and participants of the Doktorandenworkshop der Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften for valuable comments. This work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Collaborative Research Center “On-The-Fly Computing” (SFB 901).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Hoof .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoof, S. (2018). Dynamic Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: The Recursive Nash Bargaining Solution. In: Petrosyan, L., Mazalov, V., Zenkevich, N. (eds) Frontiers of Dynamic Games. Static & Dynamic Game Theory: Foundations & Applications. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92988-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics