Advertisement

Some Methodological Considerations for the Organization and Analysis of Inter- and Intra-cultural Negotiation Experiments

  • Tomasz WachowiczEmail author
  • Gregory E. Kersten
  • Ewa Roszkowska
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 315)

Abstract

In this paper we analyze some problems related to the design and analysis of the inter- and intra-cultural online negotiation experiments in which university students participate. We discuss factors that may impact the negotiation performance. Apart from national culture, which is an evident factor the impact of which is traditionally measured in cross-country negotiations, we discuss also the potential influences of university or students’ individual or group culture. When analyzing the negotiation performance, we focus not only on the bargaining process, but also on the pre-negotiation preparation. The paper provides a statistical analysis of the negotiation experiments organized in Inspire, which – unfortunately – were not designed to study all the issues raised in the paper, yet allow us to capture some of the ideas and notions discussed.

Keywords

National culture Individual culture Instructions Pre-negotiation Negotiation outcomes Online negotiation Negotiation experiments 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank two reviewers who provided valuable comments and suggestions to an earlier version of the paper. This research was supported by the grant from Polish National Science Centre (2016/21/B/HS4/01583) and from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Canada.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson, N.A., Cooper, R.B.: Media, affect, concession, and agreement in negotiation: IM versus telephone. Decis. Support Syst. 46(3), 673–684 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ow, T.T., O’Neill, B.S., Naquin, C.E.: Computer-aided tools in negotiation: negotiable issues, counterfactual thinking, and satisfaction. J. Org. Comput. Electron. Commer. 24(4), 297–311 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Purdy, J.M., Neye, P.: The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. Int. J. Conflict Manage. 11(2), 162–187 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, I.-S., Tseng, F.-T.: The relevance of communication media in conflict contexts and their effectiveness: a negotiation experiment. Comp. Hum. Behav. 59, 134–141 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Citera, M., Beauregard, R., Mitsuya, T.: An experimental study of credibility in e-negotiations. Psychol. Mark. 22(2), 163–179 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonassen, D.H., Kwon, H.: Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 49(1), 35–51 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pesendorfer, E., Graf, A., Koeszegi, S.: Relationship in electronic negotiations: tracking behavior over time. Zeitschrift fur Betriebswirtschaft 77(12), 1315–1338 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swaab, R., Postmes, T., Neijens, P.: Negotiation support systems: communication and information as antecedents of negotiation settlement. Int. Negot. 9(1), 59–78 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vetschera, R.: Preference structures and negotiator behavior in electronic negotiations. Decis. Support Syst. 44(1), 135–146 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gelfand, M.J., Christakopoulou, S.: Culture and negotiator cognition: judgment accuracy and negotiation processes in individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 79(3), 248–269 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graf, A., Koeszegi, S.T., Pesendorfer, E.M.: Intercultural negotiations in interfirm relationships: an international study of electronic negotiation behavior. J. Manag. Psychol. 25(5), 495–512 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosette, A.S., et al.: When cultures clash electronically: the impact of email and social norms on negotiation behavior and outcomes. J. Cross Cult. Psych. 43(4), 628–643 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adam, H., Shirako, A.: Not all anger is created equal: the impact of the expresser’s culture on the social effects of anger in negotiations. J. App. Psych. 98(5), 785 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galinsky, A.D., Mussweiler, T.: First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81(4), 657–669 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jang, D., Elfenbein, H.A., Bottom, W.P.: More than a phase: planning, bargaining, and implementation in theories of negotiation (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kersten, G.E., Noronha, S.J.: WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use. Decis. Support Syst. 25(2), 135–154 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Javidan, M., et al.: Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 37(6), 897–914 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gerhart, B., Fang, M.: National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence. Int. I. Hum. Res. Manage. 16(6), 971–986 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Festing, M.: Strategic human resource management in Germany: evidence of convergence to the US model, the European model, or a distinctive national model? Acad. Manage. Perspect. 26(2), 37–54 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryan, A.M., et al.: Going global: cultural values and perceptions of selection procedures. Appl. Psychol. 58(4), 520–556 (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lok, P., Crawford, J.: The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment: a cross-national comparison. J. Manage. Dev. 23(4), 321–338 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Libbey, H.P.: Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. J. Sch. Health 74(7), 274–283 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    MacNeil, A.J., Prater, D.L., Busch, S.: The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 12(1), 73–84 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sporn, B.: Managing university culture: an analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches. High. Educ. 32(1), 41–61 (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leung, K.: Cross-cultural differences: individual-level vs. culture-level analysis. Int. J. Psychol. 24(6), 703–719 (1989)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desmet, K., Ortuño-Ortín, I., Wacziarg, R.: Culture, ethnicity, and diversity. Am. Econ. Rev. 107(9), 2479–2513 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fischer, R., Schwartz, S.: Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 42(7), 1127–1144 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morris, M.W., Chiu, C.-Y., Liu, Z.: Polycultural psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 631–659 (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schwartz, S.H.: Rethinking the concept and measurement of societal culture in light of empirical findings. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 45(1), 5–13 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilson, A.: ‘Mixed race’ children in British society: some theoretical considerations. Br. J. Sociol. 35, 42–61 (1984)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Phinney, J.S., Alipuria, L.L.: At the interface of cultures: multiethnic/multiracial high school and college students. J. Soc. Psychol. 136(2), 139–158 (1996)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rockstuhl, T., Ng, K.-Y.: The effects of cultural intelligence on interpersonal trust in multicultural teams. In: Handbook of Cultural Intelligence, pp. 206–220 (2008)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pick, A.D., Pick Jr., H.L.: Culture and perception. In: Carterette, E.C., Friedman, M.P. (eds.) Handbook of Perception, pp. 19–39. Academic Press (1978)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Barsness, Z.I., Bhappu, A.D.: At the crossroads of culture and technology social influence and information-sharing processes during negotiation. In: Gelfand, M.J., Brett, J.M. (eds.) The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture, pp. 350–373 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nisbett, R.E., Miyamoto, Y.: The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(10), 467–473 (2005)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    DePaulo, B.M., Friedman, H.S.: Nonverbal communication. In: Gilbert, D., Fiske, S.T., Lindzey, G. (eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., vol. 2, pp. 3–40. Random House, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kersten, G.E., Koszegi, S., Vetschera, R.: The effects of culture in anonymous negotiations: experiment in four countries. In: System Sciences, HICSS. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zartman, I.W.: Prenegotiation: phases and functions. Int. J. 44(2), 237–253 (1989)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stein, J.G.: Getting to the table: the triggers, stages, functions, and consequences of prenegotiation. Int. J. 44(2), 475–504 (1989)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D.: Negotiation analysis: the science and art of collaborative decision making. The Balknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T.: Inaccuracy in defining preferences by the electronic negotiation system users. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G.E., Szapiro, T. (eds.) GDN 2015. LNBIP, vol. 218, pp. 131–143. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_11Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T., Kersten, G.: Can the holistic preference elicitation be used to determine an accurate negotiation offer scoring system? A comparison of direct rating and UTASTAR techniques. In: Schoop, M., Kilgour, D.M. (eds.) GDN 2017. LNBIP, vol. 293, pp. 202–214. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63546-0_15Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T.: The application of item response theory for analyzing the negotiators’ accuracy in defining their preferences. In: Bajwa, D., Koeszegi, S.T., Vetschera, R. (eds.) GDN 2016. LNBIP, vol. 274, pp. 3–15. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52624-9_1Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Swami, V., Tovée, M.J.: Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: a cross-cultural study. Body Image 2(2), 115–128 (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Vianen, A.E., et al.: Fitting in: surface-and deep-level cultural differences and expatriates’ adjustment. Acad. Manage. J. 47(5), 697–709 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Wachowicz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gregory E. Kersten
    • 2
  • Ewa Roszkowska
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Economics in KatowiceKatowicePoland
  2. 2.J. Molson School of BusinessConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of Economy and ManagementUniversity of BialystokBialystokPoland

Personalised recommendations