Skip to main content

Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Group Decision Making with Borda Rule

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Group Decision and Negotiation in an Uncertain World (GDN 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is an efficient tool to represent human thinking in decision making process. Borda rule is a powerful approach to aggregate opinions of a group members and it has been extended to several versions. In this paper, we investigate the Borda rule in the hesitant fuzzy linguistic context from both broad and narrow perspectives which are based on the possibility degree and the score function of the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set. Moreover, we take into account the confidence level of linguistic evaluations with a parameter being generated from the evaluations. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the efficiency of the Borda rule in group decision making within hesitant fuzzy linguistic information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Enrique, H.V., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and its application in decision making: A state of the art survey. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2018, in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0432-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 109–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J., Merigó, J.M.: Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 76, 127–138 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR method and its application in qualitative multiple criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(5), 1343–1355 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, H.C., Yang, L.Y., Xu, Z.S.: Two new approaches based on ELECTRE II to solve the multiple criteria decision making problems with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Appl. Soft Comput. 63, 223–234 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borda, J.C.: Mémoire sur les Élections au Scrutin, Histoire de l, Académie Royale des Sciences. Paris, France (1781)

    Google Scholar 

  8. García-Lapresta, J.L., Martínez-Panero, M.: Borda count versus approval voting: a fuzzy approach. Public Choice 112(1), 167–184 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khalid, A., Beg, I.: Incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 637–645 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. García-Lapresta, J.L., Martínez-Panero, M., Meneses, L.C.: Defining the Borda count in a linguistic decision making context. Inf. Sci. 179(14), 2309–2316 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hesamian, G., Shams, M.: Measuring similarity and ordering based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28, 983–990 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeyuan, Q., Dosskey, M.G., Kang, Y.: Choosing between alternative placement strategies for conservation buffers using Borda count. Landscape Urban Plann. 153, 66–73 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin, Z., Qiu, Z.: An improved fuzzy Borda count and its application to watershed management. In: International Conference on Renewable Energy and Environmental Technology (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison, C., Amento, B., Kuznetsov, S., Bell, R.: Rethinking the progress bar. In: ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Newport, Rhode Island, USA, October, pp. 115–118. DBLP (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, X.L., Liao, H.C.: An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Fusion 43, 13–26 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71501135, 71771156), the 2016 Key Project of the Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province (CJZ16-01, CJCB2016-02, Xq16B04), and the Scientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars at Sichuan University (No. 2016SCU04A23).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huchang Liao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mi, X., Liao, H. (2018). Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Group Decision Making with Borda Rule. In: Chen, Y., Kersten, G., Vetschera, R., Xu, H. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation in an Uncertain World. GDN 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92874-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92873-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92874-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics