Advertisement

Harbouring Francophone Public Administration in an International Congress: Challenges, Benefits, and a Glance Forward

EGPA French-Speaking Seminar
  • Emil TurcEmail author
  • Jan Mattijs
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

In acknowledgment of its two founding languages, EGPA decided in 2011 to reinstall a French-speaking area of scientific debate alongside its main English-speaking study groups. This raises several questions among which are (a) the role of languages as media of scientific exchange in context-bound disciplines such as public administration, (b) the existence of a public administration ‘Francosphere’ apposite to an established ‘Anglosphere’, (c) the risks of centre-periphery homogenization of concepts induced by cultural and linguistic artefacts in the anglophone and the francophone world, and (d) the potential benefits of scientific exchange in a dual-language setting. A discussion ensues as to the capacity of the French-speaking seminar to act as moderator between research networks of different languages; the circulation of scientific concepts and public administration hot topics between EGPA and francophone networks is analysed through a retrospective discussion of the themes of scientific gatherings and special issues over five years.

References

  1. Bance, P., & Bernier, L. (2011). Contemporary Crisis and Renewal of Public Action: Towards the Emergence of a New Form of Regulation? CIRIEC Col., Brussels: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  2. Bartoli, A. (2008). The Study of Public Management in France: La spécificité du modèle français d’administration. In W. Kickert (Ed.), The Study of Public Management in Europe and the US: A Comparative Analysis of National Distinctiveness. Abingdon and New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  3. Bartoli, A., & Blatrix, C. (2012). Des sciences modestes de l’action publique? Politiques et management publics face à la crise. Politiques et management public, 29(3), 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, J. (2002). The Emerging Anglosphere. Orbis, 46(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4387(01)00109-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vries, M., & Nemec, J. (2013). Public Sector Reform: An Overview of Recent Literature and Research on NPM and Alternative Paths. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311293408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management is Dead—Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grindle, M. S. (2013). Public Sector Reform as Problem-Solving? Comment on the World Bank’s Public Sector Management Approach for 2011 to 2020. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313490579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hagège, C. (2012). Contre la pensée unique. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
  9. Heilbron, J. (2008). Qu’est-ce qu’une tradition nationale en sciences sociales? Revue d’Histoire des Sciences Humaines, 18, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heilbron, J., & Sapiro, G. (2007). Outline for a Sociology of Translation. Current Issues and Future Prospects. In K. C. Wolf & A. Fukari (Eds.), Constructing a Sociology of Translation (pp. 93–108). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keim, W. (2010). Pour un modèle centre-périphérie dans les sciences sociales. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 4(3), 570–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Klasinc, J. (2015). Role and Influence of French Administrative Law and Practice in Croatia. EGPA Conference, French-speaking Seminar, Toulouse, August 26–28, 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J., & Grohs, S. (2008). Evaluating Administrative Modernization in German Local Governments: Success or Failure of the “New Steering Model”? Public Administration Review, 68(5), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mazouz, B., Bekono, E.-R., & Echarf, A. (2014). Pour un référentiel artefactuel des administrations publiques Francophones. In J.-F. Simard & A. Echraf Ouedraogo (Eds.), Une francophonie en quête de sens: Retour sur le premier Forum mondial de la langue française. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar
  15. Mazouz, B., & Comeau, P.-A. (2009). L’émergence de la fonction conseil-intervention au sein des organisations internationales: le cas de la diffusion des valeurs et des pratiques dites de bonne gouvernance publique. Télescope: Revue d’analyse comparée en administration publique, 15(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
  16. Mazouz, B., Facal, J., & Hatimi, I. E. (2006). Organisations internationales et diffusion de nouveaux modèles de gouvernance: des tendances globales aux réalités locales. In R. Bernier (Ed.), Réalités nationales et mondialisation (pp. 367–385). Ste-Foy: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  17. Mosbah-Natanson, S., & Gingras, Y. (2014). The Globalization of Social Sciences? Evidence from a Quantitative Analysis of 30 years of Production, Collaboration and Citations in the Social Sciences (1980–2009). Current Sociology, 62(5), 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113498866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mussari, R. (2013). “After NPM: What’s Next?”. Joint PhD-Training School—Cost LocRef, University of Oslo & the Norwegian Centre, “Studying Reforms, Experiments and Change in Local Democracy and Local Public Sector Institutions: Theories, Methods, Trends”, Paris, 30 September–2 October, 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Niculescu, M., & Galabov, A. (2015). Le modèle de gestion des organisations publiques en Europe centrale et orientale—entre mimétisme et confusion. EGPA conference, French-speaking Seminar, Toulouse, August 26–28, 2015.Google Scholar
  20. Peters, B. G. (2008). The Napoleonic Tradition. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pollitt, C. (Ed.). (2013). Context in Public Policy and Management: The Missing Link? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Pollitt, C. (2014). Towards a New World: Some Inconvenient Truths for Anglosphere Public Administration. Présenté à Conférence Braibant de l’IISA 2014, Ifrane. Morocco: International Institute of Administrative Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.iias-iisa.org/major-meetings/braibant-lectures/conference-2014-christopher-pollitt/
  23. Wagner, P. (2005). Formes d’Etat et formes de savoir social: traditions nationales et pluralité d’interprétations de la modernité. In Les sciences sociales à l’épreuve de l’action (pp. 55–87). Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut de Management Public et Gouvernance Territoriale (IMPGT) – Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Solvay Brussels School – ULBBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations