Advertisement

State and Society: Taking the Broad Perspective

Permanent Study Group 17: Sociology of the State: Reforms and Resilience
  • Jean-Michel Eymeri-DouzansEmail author
  • Daniela Piana
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

This short humoristic text expresses the gratitude of its author toward the team of the EGPA/IIAS for having entrusted him twice with the responsibility of welcoming avè plaisir (with great pleasure) the EGPA Annual Conference, in 2010 and 2015, in the radiant rose-brick city of Toulouse. Both the former capital of Languedoc with a rich cultural heritage from the Roman Empire and the Visigoths, and the present European capital of aeronautics and space industries (Airbus, EADS-Arianespace, Thalès), Toulouse is also the second university city in France after Paris, and thus an ideal place to host high-level scientific events, in a warm atmosphere.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2007). Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, G. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, T., & Jann, W. (2010). Animals in the Administrative Zoo: Organizational Change and Agency Autonomy in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Birnbaum, P. (1982). La logique de l’Etat. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  5. Birnbaum, P., & Badie, B. (1983). The Sociology of the State. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  7. Boudon, R. (1995). Le juste et le vrai: études sur l’objectivité des valeurs et de la connaissance. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  8. Boudon, R. (1999). Le sens des valeurs. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  9. Boudon, R. (2003). Raison, Bonnes Raisons. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (2012). Sur l'État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  12. Cassese, S., & Wright, V. (Eds.). (1996). La Recomposition de l’Etat en Europe. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  13. Chevallier, J. (2003). L’Etat post-moderne. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
  14. Crozier, M. (1963). Le phénomène bureaucratique, essai sur les tendances bureaucratiques des systèmes d’organisation modernes et sur leurs relations en France avec le système social et culturel. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  15. Crozier, M. (1991). Etat modeste, Etat moderne. Stratégies pour un autre changement. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  16. Dahrendorf, R. (1988). The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics of Liberty. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  17. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dupuy, F., & Thoenig, J.-C. (1985). L’administration en miettes. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  19. Durkheim, E. (1975). Textes 1. Eléments d’une théorie sociale. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  20. Elias, N. (1969). The Civilizing Process, Vol. I: The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Elias, N. (1978). What is Sociology? New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Elias, N. (1982). The Civilizing Process, Vol. II: State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, R. (2005, November). Gouverner à distance. Quand l’Etat se retire des territoires. Esprit, 96–111.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M. (2011). NPM-Inspired Reforms Legacy. A Common Praxeologic, a Variety of Acclimatizations, a Renewed Bureaucratization. In J.-M. Eymeri-Douzans & J. Pierre (Eds.), Administrative Reforms and Democratic Governance (pp. 9–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (2013). France and Its Public Administrations. A State of the art/La France et ses administrations. Un état des savoirs. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (2014). On the Government of the Living: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1979–1980 (G. Burchell, Trans.). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Giddens, A. (1985). The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  31. Grimm, S., Lemay-Hébert, N., & Nay, O. (Eds.). (2015). The Political Invention of Fragile States: The Power of Ideas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hassenteufel, P. (1995). Les groupes d’intérêt dans l’action publique: l’État en interaction. Pouvoirs, revue française d’études constitutionnelles et politiques, 74, 155–168.Google Scholar
  35. Hauriou, M. (1923). Précis de droit constitutionnel. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
  36. Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Outlines of the Philosophy of Right. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hobsbawm, E. (1989). Age of Empire: 1875–1914. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  38. Hobsbawm, E. (1995). Age of Revolution: 1789–1848. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  39. Hobsbawm, E. (1996). The Age of Capital, 1848–1875. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  40. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Jessop, B. (2008). State Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kassim, H., Peters, G. B., & Wright, V. (2000). The National Co-ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kehoane, R. O. (2002). Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Lagroye, J., & Offerlé, M. (2010). Sociologie de l’institution. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  46. Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Science Po.Google Scholar
  47. Linz, J., & Stepan, A. C. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Luhmann, N. (2012/2013). Theory of Society (Vol. 1–2). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  50. Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mann, M. (1986–2012). The Sources of Social Power (Vol. 1–4). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  54. Migdal, J. (2010). State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Musselin, C. (2010). The Market for Academics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Ogien, A. (1995). L’esprit gestionnaire. Une analyse de l’air du temps. Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.Google Scholar
  57. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Parsons, T. (1949). The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  59. Peters, B. G. (2008). The Politics of Bureaucracy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Poggi, G. (1978). The Development of the Modern State. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  61. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.). (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism. London: NLB.Google Scholar
  63. Rhodes, R. W. A. (1999). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Rhodes, R. W. A. (2005). The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of Public Service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rhodes, R. W. A. (2016). Recovering the Craft of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rokkan, S. (1999). State Formation, Nation Building and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan (P. Flora, et al., Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rosanvallon, P. (1993). L’Etat en France: de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  68. Rousseau, J.-J. (2012). Of The Social Contract and Other Political Writings. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  69. Shefter, M. (1994). Political Parties and the State: The American Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  71. Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Strange, S. (1988). States and Markets. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  73. Tanguy, G. (2009). “Corps et âme de l’État”. Socio-histoire de l’institution préfectorale (1880–1940). PhD dissertation, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
  74. Tanguy, G., & Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M. (Eds.). (Forthcoming). Prefects, Governors & Commissioners. A European Survey on Territorial Representatives of the State.Google Scholar
  75. Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  76. Wallerstein, I. (1984). The Politics of the World-Economy. The States, the Movements and the Civilizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wallerstein, I. (1991). Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth Century Paradigms. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  78. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sciences Po ToulouseToulouseFrance
  2. 2.University of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations