Advertisement

EGPA and the Study of EU Public Administration

EGPA Permanent Study Group 14: EU Administration and Multilevel Governance
  • Gijs Jan BrandsmaEmail author
  • Eva G. Heidbreder
  • Ellen Mastenbroek
Chapter
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)

Abstract

Administration has always been a focal point of European Union (EU) research. Yet, the study of multilevel and EU administrations as research subject in its own right is more recent. The Permanent Study Group has assembled some of the key contributors to the most prominent debates, namely the EU’s core administrations, the interplay between international or supranational and lower level administrative units, questions of administrative autonomy in public and semi-autonomous agencies, systemic changes due to multilevel interactions and questions of compliance, as well as normative questions of accountability and control more broadly. In sum, multilevel administration, crucially studies in the EU context, has developed an elaborate research agenda that generates generalisable findings for multilevel administrations and their implications for contemporary governance.

References

  1. Barbieri, D., & Ongaro, E. (2008). EU Agencies: What is Common and What is Distinctive Compared with National-level Public Agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, M. W., & Ege, J. r. (2016). Bureaucratic Autonomy of International Organizations’ Secretariats. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1019–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer, M. W., & Trondal, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  4. Benz, A., Corcaci, A., & Doser, J. W. (2016). Unravelling Multilevel Administration. Patterns and Dynamics of Administrative Co-ordination in European Governance. Journal of Europan Public Policy, 23(7), 999–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blom-Hansen, J. (2013). Comitology Choices in the EU Legislative Process: Contested or Consensual Decisions? Public Administration, 92(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börzel, T., & Heidbreder, E. G. (2016). Enforcement and Compliance. In C. Harlow, P. Leino-Sandberg, & G. della Cananea (Eds.), Research Handbook on EU Administrative Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2000). When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change. EIoP, 4, 15. Retrieved January 15, 2003, from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.
  8. Bovens, M. A. P., Curtin, D. M., & ‘t Hart, P. (Eds.). (2010). The Real World of EU Accountability: What Deficit? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brandsma, G. J., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2015). Controlling Delegated Powers in the Post-Lisbon European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(4), 531–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brandsma, G. J., Heidbreder, E., & Mastenbroek, E. (2016). Accountability in the Post-Lisbon European Union. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), 621–637.Google Scholar
  11. Christiansen, T., & Vanhoonacker, S. (2008). At a Critical Juncture? Change and Continuity in the Institutional Development of the Council Secretariat. West European Politics, 31(4), 751–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombes, D. (1970). Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community: A Portrait of the Commission of the E.E.C. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Curtin, D., & Egeberg, M. (2008). Tradition and Innovation: Europe’s Accumulated Executive Order. West European Politics, 31(4), 639–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Orta, C. (2003). What Future for the European Administration Space? EIPA Working Paper, p. 15. Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://www.eipa.eu/files/repository/product/2003w05(2).pdf.
  15. Dobbels, M., & Neuhold, C. (2013). “The Roles Bureaucrats Play”: The Input of European Parliament (EP) Administrators into the Ordinary Legislative Procedure: A Case Study Approach. Journal of European Integration, 35(4), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eckhard, S., & Ege, J. (2016). International Bureaucracies and their Influence on Policy-making: A Review of Empirical Evidence. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 960–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Egeberg, M. (Ed.). (2007). Institutional Dynamics and the Transformation of Executive Politics in Europe. Mannheim: CONNEX Report Series Nr. 03.Google Scholar
  18. Egeberg, M., Gornitzka, A. s., & Trondal, J. (2014). A Not So Technocratic Executive? Everyday Interaction between the European Parliament and the Commission. West European Politics, 37(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). Political Leadership and Bureaucratic Autonomy: Effects of Agencification. ARENA Working Paper Series, No. 09. Retrieved August 31, 2009, from http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2009/papers/WP09_09.xml.
  20. Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. M. (Eds.). (2003). The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goetz, K. H. (2001). European Integration and National Executives: A Cause in Search of an Effect? In K. H. Goetz & S. Hix (Eds.), Europeanised Politics? European Integration and National Systems (pp. 211–231). London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  22. Grande, E., & McCowan, M. (2015). The Two Logics of Multilevel Administration in the EU. In M. W. Bauer & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System (pp. 45–65). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Green Cowles, M., Caporaso, J., & Risse, T. (Eds.). (2001). Transforming Europe: Europeanisation and Domestic Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grønnegaard Christensen, J., & Lehmann Nielsenm, V. (2010). Administrative Capacity, Structural Choice and the Creation of EU Agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2), 176–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2014). Which Policy for Europe? Power and Conflict inside the European Commission. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heidbreder, E. G. (2011). Structuring the European Administrative Space: Policy Instruments of Multi-level Administration. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(5), 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Héritier, A., & Knill, C. (2001). Diffrential Responses to European Policies: A Comparison. In A. Héritier et al. (Eds.), Differential Europe: New Opportunities and Restrictions for Member-State Policies (pp. 257–294). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Kassim, H. (2003). Meeting the Demands of EU Membership: The Europeanization of National Administrative Systems. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The Politics of Europeanization (pp. 83–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., et al. (2013). The European Commission in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knill, C. (1998). The Impact of National Administrative Traditions. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Knill, C., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Policy-making by International Public Administrations: Concepts, Causes and Consequences. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Knill, C., Eckhard, S., & Grohs, S. (2016). Administrative Styles in the European Commission and the OSCE Secretariat: Striking Similarities Despite Different Organizational Settings. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1057–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. König, T., & Mäder, L. (2014). The Strategic Nature of Compliance: An Empirical Evaluation of Law Implementation in the Central Monitoring System of the European Union. American Journal of Political Science, 58(1), 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olsen, J. (2003). Towards a European Administrative Space? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 506–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schäfer, G. F., Neuhold, C., Haibach, G., Türk, A., Larsson, T., & Maurer, A. (2000). Governance by Committee: The Role of Committees in European Policy Making and Policy Implementation. EIPA Research Paper. Maastricht: 00/GHA. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/548/01/main.pdf.
  37. Siedentopf, H., & Speer, B. (2003). The European Administrative Space from a German Administrative Science Perspective. International Review of Administrative Science, 89(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomann, E. (2015). Customizing Europe: Transposition as Bottom-up Implementation. Journal of Europan Public Policy, 22(10), 1368–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Trondal, J. (2007). The Public Administration Turn in Integration Research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 960–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trondal, J. (2010). An Emergent European Executive Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trondal, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2016). Conceptualizing the European Multilevel Administrative Order: Capturing Variation in the European Administrative System. European Political Science Review, 1–22. First View: January.Google Scholar
  42. Yesikagit, K., & Christensen, J. G. (2010). Institutional Design and Formal Autonomy: Political versus Historical and Cultural Explanations. Journal of Public Administration Research Theory, 20(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gijs Jan Brandsma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eva G. Heidbreder
    • 2
  • Ellen Mastenbroek
    • 3
  1. 1.Universiteit UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Otto-von-Guericke Universität MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany
  3. 3.Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations