Skip to main content

Global Versus Local Integration and Europe’s Options

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1701 Accesses

Abstract

Using the world trade model, we show that small countries and countries with high trade barriers gain more than others from global trade integration. Poor countries and commodity exporters benefit along with others. For Western Europe, trade integration with other world regions could provide larger gains than intra-European integration, if a similar depth of integration could be achieved—however, it is not so easy. Also for Europe, trade liberalisation must be reciprocal if a loss of manufacturing is to be avoided. Integration between Europe and Asia could relocate manufacturing to Europe. With respect to trade integration within world regions, Asia and surprisingly Africa have most to gain from such integration, whereas Eastern Europe is at the other end of this scale—Russia should “go global” and engage in FTAs (Free Trade Agreements) beyond its neighbourhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In small-scale simulations with the model (with 10 countries) we also obtain a more standard result—the impact of liberalisation on manufacturing is inversely related to the natural resources endowment. The result found in Table 8.1 should therefore be interpreted with some caution.

  2. 2.

    Here we use the term agglomeration shadow in a bit more general sense than standard in the new economic geography; see, for example, Fujita and Krugman (1995) or an overview in Fujita and Mori (2005) or Fujita et al. (1999).

  3. 3.

    In these tables, world integration (flat trade cost reduction of 30%) is also included for reference.

  4. 4.

    “Africa’s big new free trade agreement, explained”. Washington Post 29 March 2018, by Landry Signé.

References

  • Fujita, M., & Krugman, P. (1995). When Is the Economy Monocentric? von Thünen and Chamberlin Unified. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 25, 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., & Mori, T. (2005). Frontiers of the New Economic Geography. Papers in Regional Science, 84(3), 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D. S. (2018). Creating the North Atlantic Marketplace for Jobs and Growth. Three Paths, One Detour, A U-Turn, and the Road to Nowhere. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Melchior, A. (2018). Global Versus Local Integration and Europe’s Options. In: Free Trade Agreements and Globalisation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92834-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92834-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92833-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92834-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics