Skip to main content

Risks and Opportunities of Sustainable Biomass and Biogas Production for the African Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks

Abstract

Almost all important natural resources – e.g. oil, diamonds, gold, platinum, coal, copper, ore, phosphate etc. – including rare earth metals for industries functioning in the international arena, are available on the African continent. Roughly 15% of the total world market of resources is in Africa. International interest in Africa is via the relatively political and economic stable countries of the ‘Africa 7’ – South Africa, Botswana, Morocco, Ghana, Nigeria, Egypt and Kenya. According to Doing Business Report and the World Bank, statistically, about 60% of the resources from agriculture in Africa are still reserves. Based on the international trends to support developing countries by establishing a market for biomass production, with the aim of advanced energy production, resource efficiency, emission reduction, it has to be balanced with the internationally supervised and important sector of food security. As markets in Africa show, the agricultural sector, including cattle production, to be a very strong market, biomass residues such as cow manure and other organic substances are available as a cheap or free by-product. To turn these natural resources into a valuable commodity, it simply has to be converted by fermentation into biogas usable for cooking or electricity and fertiliser usable for private gardening. Current knowledge has proved how effective and simple biomass and biogas production can be. The output of one ton of silage can produce up to 200 m3 of biogas with a productivity of 5.0–7.5 kWh electricity per m3 of biogas. Cow manure as a source of waste product is available at an annual amount of 7.5–21.0 m3 per animal with a productivity of about 30 m3 of biogas including 56% of methane (CH4). A micro-biogas production facility is viable with a capacity of about 1 kWh – this is equivalent to the digestion of cow manure from seven milk cows. Using biomass additionally supports the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) particularly CO2, NH4, N2O. Compared to CO2, NH4 has got 25-times higher and N2O 298-times higher Global Warming Potential (GWP). The reduction of these greenhouse gases as a side benefit of biomass production provides an indication of how positive this strategy could be for both the agricultural sector as well and general public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.indexmundi.com

  2. 2.

    www.indexmundi.com

References

  • Advisory Service on Appropriate Technology (ISAT) (2011) Biogas digest. vol 1: Biogas basics, vol 2: Biogas - application and product development

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown V (2006) Biogas: a bright idea for Africa. Environ Health Perspect 114(5):A300–A303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for Security Studies (2008) CSS analzses in security policy No. 38, ETH Zuerich

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen P, Overholt A, Rutledge B, Tomic J (2010) Economic assessment of biogas and biomethane production from manure. White Paper, Callstart

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuéllar AD, Webber ME (2008) Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environ Res Lett 3(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Shol M, Wesseler J (2010) The economics and policy of biogas production, Wageningen University, thesis code ENR-80424

    Google Scholar 

  • GIZ (former GTZ) (1989) Biogas plants in animal husbandry, Vieweg

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Environment Facility (GEF) (2006) Discussion note for high level roundtable of climate change: mitigation and adaptation. Third GEF Assembly, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaltschmitt M, Hartmann H (2001) Energie aus Biomasse – Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren. Springer Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann C (2005) Energy and poverty in Africa, Policy insights no. 8, OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitfaden Biogas (2010) 5. vollständig überarbeitete Auflage

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta A (2002) The economics and feasibility of electricity generation using manure digesters on small and mid-size, January. University of Wisconsin – Madison, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram B (2010) Renewable energy development in Africa - challenges, opportunities, way forward 21st world energy congress, theme 2: availability - what is the right energy mix for long term stability Montreal, Canada from the 11th to 16th Sep

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz D, Janssen R (2012) Keynote introduction: biomass technologies and Markets in Africa. In: Rutz D, Janssen R (eds) Bioenergy for sustainable development in Africa. Springer Science+Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  • Susanti A, Burges P (2012) Oil palm expansion: competing claim of lands for food, biofuels, and conservation. In: Behnassi M, Pollmann O, Kissinger G (eds) Sustainable food security in the era of local and global environmental change. Springer, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels – the food, energy and environment trilemma. Science 325(July):270–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Energy (2010) Anaerobic digestion, which takes place in three stages produces biogas. Different kinds of micro-organisms are responsible for the processes that characterize each stage (https://www1.eere.energy.gov/tribalenergy/guide/biomass_biopower.html)

  • www.fao.org

    Google Scholar 

  • www.indexmundi.com

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Pollmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pollmann, O., Podruzsik, S., van Rensburg, L. (2019). Risks and Opportunities of Sustainable Biomass and Biogas Production for the African Market. In: Behnassi, M., Gupta, H., Pollmann, O. (eds) Human and Environmental Security in the Era of Global Risks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92828-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics