Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 299 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

Kutlay argues that paradigmatic reforms are the outcomes of complex interactions of a set of factors. A fragile joining up of agency-level and institutional factors makes reform processes intricate, contingent, and context dependent. The chapter revisits the Turkish and Greek political economies and makes the case that the comparative analysis of these two cases is still under-studied in the literature. The concluding chapter also compares three-stage conceptual framework with some major explanations and offer three main propositions. The chapter also discusses avenues for future research that concerns southern European model of capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nicos Konstandaras, “Greece’s Economic and Political Traps,” New York Times, October 26, 2014.

  2. 2.

    Alesina, Ardagna, and Trebbi, “Who Adjusts and When?,” IMF Staff Paper.

  3. 3.

    Tanja Börzel and Thomas Risse, “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change,” EIoP Online Papers 4, no. 15 (2000): 2.

  4. 4.

    Öniş and Şenses, “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State,” METU Studies in Development, 258.

  5. 5.

    Işık Özel, “The politics of De-delegation: Regulatory (In)dependence in Turkey,” Regulation and Governance 6, no. 1 (2012): 119–129.

References

  • Alesina, lberto, Silvia Ardagna, and Francesco Trebbi. “Who Adjusts and When? On the Political Economy of Reforms.” IMF Staff Papers 53 (2006): 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, Tanja, and Thomas Risse. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” EIoP Online Papers 4, no. 15 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstandaras, Nicos. “Greece’s Economic and Political Traps.” New York Times. October 26, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Ziya, and Fikret Şenses. “Global Dynamics, Domestic Coalitions and Reactive State: Major Policy Shifts in Post-War Turkish Economic Development.” METU Studies in Development, no. 34 (2007): 251–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özel, Işık. “The Politics of De-delegation: Regulatory (In)dependence in Turkey.” Regulation and Governance 6, no. 1 (2012): 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kutlay, M. (2019). Conclusion. In: The Political Economies of Turkey and Greece. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92789-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics