Skip to main content

The Rise of the Social Sciences and Humanities in France: Institutionalization, Professionalization, and Autonomization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Shaping Human Science Disciplines

Abstract

This chapter studies the institutional development of the SSH in France. The first part concentrates on the two major historical phases of their institutionalization as academic disciplines, their professional development, and the autonomization of scientific fields in these domains, focusing primarily on seven disciplines: economics; political science; sociology; anthropology; philosophy; psychology; and literary studies. The second part focuses on morphological trends since the 1980s, providing quantitative data on the evolution of the seven disciplines studied here (faculty, researchers and students). This part questions current transformations regarding the balance of power between different SSH disciplines. It underlines also two major evolutions in the morphology of SSH researchers and professors: feminization and internationalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter relies in part on the collective work done by the French team of the Interco-SSH project, which included: Lucile Dumont, Quentin Fondu, Constantin Brissaud, Jean-Michel Chahsiche, Corentin Bourdeaux, and Annabelle Bonnet. Madeline Bedecarré helped to translate and proofread it.

  2. 2.

    Arrêté 1945/E, 19 August 1936.

  3. 3.

    The data concerns comparable series from available official sources that are cited for each figure. For university professors, comparable series start in 1984, when the status of “enseignant-chercheur” was established.

  4. 4.

    Data kindly provided by Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, president of the EHESS, who conducted these tallies. The count that we made based on the school’s website in 2016 confirms the 2015 data.

  5. 5.

    This proportion increased at the end of the 1980s and then decreased (Backouche and Topalov 2008).

  6. 6.

    As evidenced by the recruitment in sociology, which is more open to degree holders in political science than political science is to sociologists, and the fact that the calls for tenders that finance research increasingly promote socioeconomic analyses.

  7. 7.

    Source: 2015 INSEE activity report.

  8. 8.

    In the first five years, SSH projects were financed up to 175 M€ all categories combined (close to half of them having responded to the open call) (Weil and Cases 2012, 33). In 2015, the 35 projects selected in the frame of the “challenge” “Innovative, integral and adaptive societies” (where most of the projects proposed by researchers in the SSH were submitted), represented only 5.3% of all projects accepted in 2015 (665) and, in terms of financing, 3.4% of funding for the generic call for projects, that is to say about 10 million euros out of 300 million (outside co-financing). The success rate of projects submitted by sociologists and political scientists was markedly lower than that of projects submitted by economists. Data presented by the head of the ANR’s SSH department François Héran, in the report of the Conseil scientifique de l’INSHS, “Analyse des résultats des projets SHS suite aux AAP “défis sociaux” de l’ANR pour 2015-2016 et propositions de réformes,” February 1st 2016 [online].

  9. 9.

    Le CNRS en chiffre, CNRS, 2000, p. 6.

  10. 10.

    See the INSH’s website: http://www.cnrs.fr/inshs/presentation/carte_chercheurs.htm.

  11. 11.

    Annual employee report of the CNRS, 2001 and 2014.

  12. 12.

    It is not a matter of affirmative action, but the growing awareness of discriminatory mechanisms against women.

  13. 13.

    The analysis of the age pyramid confirms this analysis, the distribution between men and women being more equal among the youngest. See the EHESS’s annual employee reports from 2010, 2014, and 2015.

  14. 14.

    Given that not all masters students who enrolled completed their master’s degree, and that not all of them chose to continue at the doctoral level, while some students coming from elsewhere in France or abroad enrolled directly in Ph.D. programs.

  15. 15.

    Data kindly provided by Audrey Gauthier (EHESS).

  16. 16.

    Data kindly provided by Audrey Gauthier (EHESS).

  17. 17.

    Data kindly provided by the human resources department of the EHESS.

  18. 18.

    At the French Senate, on 26 November 2015. Sonya Faure, Cécile Daumas, Anastasia Vécrin, «Culture de l’excuse: Des sociologues répondent à Valls», Libération, 12 janvier 2016.

References

  • Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of disciplines. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backouche, Isabelle, and Christian Topalov (eds.). 2008. Vingt ans d’élection à l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales (1986–2005). Synthèse des résultats d’enquête. Paris: Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barré, Rémi, Michèle Crance, and Anne Sigogneau. 2002. La Recherche scientifique française: les enseignants-chercheurs et les chercheurs des EPST. Situation démographique le 31.12.2000. Paris: Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques (OST).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, Joseph, and Randall Collins. 1966. Social factors in the origins of a new science: The case of psychology. American Sociological Review 31 (4): 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boncourt, Thibaud. 2011. L’Internationalisation de la science politique: une comparaison franco-britannique (1945–2010). PhD thesis, Institut d’études politiques de Bordeaux, Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement de goût. Paris: Minuit. English transl. by Richard Nice. 1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Homo Academicus. Paris: Minuit. English transl. by Peter Collier. 1988. Stanford: Stanford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. La Noblesse d’État: Grandes écoles et esprit de corps. Paris: Minuit. English transl. by Lauretta C. Clough. 1996. State nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford: Stanford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’agir. English transl. by Richard Nice. 2004. Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutier, Jean, Jean-Claude Passeron, and Jacques Revel (eds.). 2006. Qu’est-ce qu’une discipline? Paris: Editions de l’EHESS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion-Vincent, Véronique. 1970. Organisation de l’ethnologie en France. L’Homme 10 (3): 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroy, Jacqueline, Annick Ohayon, and Régin Plas. 2006. Histoire de la psychologie en France XIXe–XXe siècles. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charle, Christophe. 1994. La République des universitaires, 1870–1940. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charle, Christophe. 1999. Les femmes dans l’enseignement supérieur. Dynamiques et freins d’une présence 1946–1992. In Avenirs et avant-gardes en France XIX-XX siècles, hommage à Madeleine Rebérioux, ed. Vincent Duclert, Rémi Fabre, and Patrick Fridenson. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenu, Alain. 2002. Une institution sans intention. La sociologie en France depuis l’après-guerre. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 140–142 (1–2): 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Alice. 2013. In the museum of man: Race, anthropology, and empire in France, 1850–1950. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Convert, Bernard. 2010. Espace de l’enseignement supérieur et stratégies étudiantes. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 183: 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranney, Jean. 1996. Inra, 50 ans d’un organisme de recherche. Paris: Editions Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denord, François, Paul Lagneau-Ymonet, and Sylvain Thine. 2011. Le champ du pouvoir en France. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 190 (5): 24–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digeon, Claude. 1959. La Crise allemande de la pensée française (1870–1914). Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, Vincent. 2013. La Culture comme vocation. Paris: Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espagne, Michel. 1993. Le Paradigme de l’étranger. Les chaires de littérature étrangère au XIXe siècle. Paris: Cerf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabiani, Jean-Louis. 1988. Les Philosophes de la République. Paris: Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure, Sylvia, and Charles Soulié. 2006. La recherche universitaire à l’épreuve de la massification scolaire. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 164: 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure, Sylvia, Charles Soulié, and Mathias Millet. 2006. Rationalisation, bureaucratisation et mise en crise de l’ethos académique. Regards sociologiques 31: 107–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favre, Pierre. 1989. Naissances de la science politique en France, 1870–1914. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Donald. 1983. The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony: Rockefeller foundations and the social sciences. Sociology 17 (2): 206–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Christian. 2011. A transatlantic history of the social sciences: Robber Barons, the Third Reich and the invention of empirical social resarch. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondu, Quentin. 2014. L’ʻinventionʼ de la discipline universitaire des études théâtrales en France (1948–1981). Master thesis, EHESS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les Mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and societies: Discipline and profession in the United States, Britain and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, Gérald. 1989. Chronique de la recherche ethnologique dans son rapport au centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1925–1980. Cahiers pour l’histoire du CNRS 3: 85–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingras, Yves, and Brigitte Gemme. 2006. L’emprise du champ scientifique sur le champ universitaire et ses effets. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 64: 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, Johan. 2013. The social sciences as an emerging global field. Current Sociology 62 (5): 685–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, Johan. 2015. French sociology. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarausch, Konrád H. 1990. The unfree professions: German lawyers, teachers and engineers, 1900–1950. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanpierre, Laurent. 2016. L’aventure des sciences de l’homme. In La Vie intellectuelle en France, 2, de 1914 à nos jours, ed. Christophe Charle, 139–166. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karady, Victor. 1976. Durkheim, les sciences sociales et l’Université: bilan d’un semi-échec. Revue française de sociologie 17 (2): 267–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karady, Victor. 1983. Les professeurs de la République: le marché scolaire, les réformes universitaires et les transformation de la fonction professorale à la fin du 19ème siècle. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 47–48: 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebaron, Frédéric. 1997. La dénégation du pouvoir. Le champ des économistes français au milieu des années 1990. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 119: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebaron, Frédéric. 2000. La Croyance économique. Les économistes entre science et politique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude, and Didier Eribon. 2001. De près et de loin. Suivi de Deux ans après. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Olivier. 2002. Introduction. La revue pour l’histoire du CNRS 7: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvetz, Tom. 2012. Think tanks in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, Jean-François. 1990. La République des savants : la recherche française et le CNRS. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, Michael. 1976. La planification des sciences sociales. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2: 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popa, Ioana. 2015. Aires culturelles et recompositions (inter)disciplinaires. La 6e section de l’EPHE et les études sur l’espace russe, soviétique et est-européen. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 210: 60–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prost, Antoine, and Jean-Richard Cytermann. 2010. Une histoire en chiffre de l’enseignement supérieur. Le Mouvement social 233: 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renoliet, Jean-Jacques. 1999. L’UNESCO oubliée. La Société des nations et la coopérations intellectuelles (1919–1946). Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renisio, Yann. 2015. L’origine sociale des disciplines. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 210: 10–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribard, Dinah. 2000. Philosophe ou écrivain? Problèmes de délimitation entre histoire littéraire et histoire de la philosophie en France, 1650–1850. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 55 (2): 355–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosental, Paul-André. 2003. L’Intelligence démographique. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, Gisèle. 2004. Défense et illustration de ‘l’honnête homme’. Les hommes de lettres contre la sociologie. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 153: 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, Gisèle. 2006. Les professions intellectuelles, entre l’Etat, l’entrepreneuriat et l’industrie. Le Mouvement social 214: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, Gisèle. 2013. Le champ est-il national? La théorie de la différenciation sociale au prisme de l’histoire globale. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 200: 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulié, Charles. 2013. Des humanités à ʻl’économie de la connaissanceʼ? Les transformations du corps enseignant en lettres et sciences humaines en France (1949–2010). In Faut-il brûler les Humanités et les Sciences humaines et sociales? ed. Marc Conesa, Pierre-Yves Lacour, Frédéric Rousseau, and Jean-François Thomas. Paris: Michel Houdiard Editeur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, Rudolf. 1992. The sociology of scientific disciplines: On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure of modern science. Science in Context 5 (1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Touchelay, Béatrice. 2000. L’I.N.S.E.E. et le C.N.P.F. de 1946 à 1961: l’histoire d’une alliance modernisatrice. Le Mouvement Social 191: 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tournès, Ludovic. 2011. Sciences de l’homme et politique. Les Fondations philanthropiques américaines en France au XXe siècle. Paris: Editions des Classiques Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, François et Chantal Cases. 2012. La Structuration de la recherche en sciences humaines et sociales. Rapport du groupe Structuration de l’Alliance Athena. Online.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisèle Sapiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sapiro, G., Brun, E., Fordant, C. (2019). The Rise of the Social Sciences and Humanities in France: Institutionalization, Professionalization, and Autonomization. In: Fleck, C., Duller, M., Karády, V. (eds) Shaping Human Science Disciplines. Socio-Historical Studies of the Social and Human Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92780-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92780-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92779-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92780-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics