Advertisement

Residual Stresses in Friction Stir Spot Welded AA1060 to C11000 Using the X-Ray Diffraction Technique (Case Study)

  • Mukuna Patrick Mubiayi
  • Esther Titilayo Akinlabi
  • Mamookho Elizabeth Makhatha
Chapter
Part of the Structural Integrity book series (STIN, volume 6)

Abstract

Aluminium and copper are widely used in engineering structures, due to their unique performances, such as higher electrical conductivity, heat conductivity, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties even though they have considerable differences in their melting points. In this study, the microstructure of the friction stir spot welds of aluminium and copper produced at various parameter combinations were analyzed by using a scanning electron microscope; while the residual stresses were studied by using the X-ray diffraction technique. Furthermore, the electrical resistivities of the joints was also measured. The evolving microstructure shows a good mixing in the produced spot welds with Cu particles present in the aluminium matrix. The formation of a copper ring/hook was evident in all the spot welds; and the length thereof increased with the shoulder plunge depth variation; while the spot welds produced at 1200 rpm for the two tool geometries exhibited a decrease and a slight increment in the length of the copper ring using a flat pin/flat shoulder and conical pin/concave shoulder, respectively. The obtained residual stresses results were compressive. The maximum residual stress of −116.8 MPa was measured on the copper ring of the welds produced at 800 rpm and 0.5 mm shoulder plunge depth, when using a flat pin and a flat shoulder tool. This was due to the generation of stress, when the copper was extruded into the aluminium sheets. Furthermore, the intensity of all the peaks using different process parameters decreased in comparison to the peaks generated by the parent materials and the effect of shoulder plunge depth on the full width at half the maximum (FWHM) was observed. The values of the measured electrical resistivities of the joints were higher than those of the parent materials.

Keywords

Aluminium Copper Copper ring Electrical resistivity Full width at half maximum (FWHM) Residual stresses 

References

  1. 1.
    Rossini NS, Dassisti M, Benyounis KY, Olabi AG (2012) Methods of measuring residual stresses in components. Mater Des 35:572–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lombard H (2007) Optimized fatigue and fracture performance of friction stir welded aluminium plate: a study of the inter-relationship between process parameters, TMAZ, microstructure, defect population and performance. PhD thesis, Faculty of Technology University of Plymouth (England) in collaboration with Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (South Africa)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pfeiffer W, Reisacher E, Windisch M, Kahnert M (2014) The effect of specimen size on residual stresses in friction stir welded aluminum components. Adv Mater Res 996:445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach M, Merati A, Gharghouri M (2014) effects of fatigue on the integrity of a friction stir welded lap joint containing residual stresses. Adv Mater Res 996:794–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fratini L, Pasta S, Reynolds AP (2009) Fatigue crack growth in 2024-T351 friction stir welded joints: longitudinal residual stress and microstructural effects. Int J Fatigue 31:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma YuE, Staron P, Fischer T, Irving PE (2011) Size effects on residual stress and fatigue crack growth in friction stir welded 2195-T8 aluminium—Part I: Experiments. Int J Fatigue 33:1417–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ni DR, Chen DL, Xiao BL, Wanga D, Ma ZY (2013) Residual stresses and high cycle fatigue properties of friction stir welded SiCp/AA2009 composites. Int J Fatigue 55:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steuwer A, Peel MJ, Withers PJ (2006) Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083–AA6082: the effect of process parameters on residual stress. Mater Sci Eng A 441:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Altenkirch J, Steuwer A, Peel M, Richards DG, Withers PJ (2008) The effect of tensioning and sectioning on residual stresses in aluminium AA7749 friction stir welds. Mater Sci Eng A 488:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lombard H, Hattingh DG, Steuwera A, James MN (2009) Effect of process parameters on the residual stresses in AA5083-H321 friction stir welds. Mater Sci Eng A 501:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peel M, Steuwer A, Preuss M, Withers PJ (2003) Microstructure, mechanical properties and residual stresses as a function of welding speed in aluminium AA5083 friction stir welds. Acta Mater 51:4791–4801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prime MB, Gnaupel-Herold T, Baumann JA, Lederich RJ, Bowden DM, Sebring RJ (2006) Residual stress measurements in a thick, dissimilar aluminum alloy friction stir weld. Acta Materialia 54:4013–4021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Linton VM, Ripley MI (2008) Influence of time on residual stresses in friction stir welds in age hardenable 7xxx aluminium alloys. Acta Mater 56:4319–4327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Akinlabi ET, Madyira DM, Akinlabi SA (2011) Effect of heat input on the electrical resistivity of dissimilar friction stir welded joints of aluminium and copper. In: IEEE Africon 2011—The Falls Resort and Conference Centre, Livingstone, Zambia, 13–15 Sept 2011. 978-1-61284-993-5/11/$26.00Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Savolainen K (2012) Friction stir welding of copper and microstructure and properties of the welds. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering Design and Production, Aalto University, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akinlabi ET (2010) Characterisation of dissimilar friction stir welds between 5754 aluminium alloy and C11000 copper. D-Tech thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heideman R, Johnson C, Kou S (2010) Metallurgical analysis of Al/Cu friction stir spot welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 15(7):597–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Badarinarayan H, Yang Q, Zhu S (2009) Effect of tool geometry on static strength of friction stir spot-welded aluminum alloy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(2):142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Özdemir U, Sayer S, Yeni Ç, Bornova-Izmir (2012) Effect of pin penetration depth on the mechanical properties of friction stir spot welded aluminum and copper. Mater Test IN Join Technol 54(4):233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vashista M, Paul S (2012) Correlation between full width at half maximum (FWHM) of XRD peak with residual stress on ground surfaces. Philos Mag 92(33):4194–4204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786435.2012.704429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lomholt TC (2011) Microstructure evolution during friction stir spot welding of TRIP steel. PhD thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim HJ, Lee YJ, Paik KW, Koh KW, Won J, Choe S, Lee J, Moon JT, Park YT (2003) Effects of Cu/Al intermetallic compound (IMC) on Copper Wire and aluminum pad bondability. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 26(2)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mukuna Patrick Mubiayi
    • 1
  • Esther Titilayo Akinlabi
    • 1
  • Mamookho Elizabeth Makhatha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering ScienceUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of MetallurgyUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations