Skip to main content

Gender and Intimate Solidarity in Refugee-Sponsorships of Unaccompanied Young Men

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe

Abstract

Based on qualitative interviews conducted in Austria, this chapter analyses the practice of a particularly intimate form of refugee help: sponsorships of young male refugees. The chapter discusses the motivations that lead volunteers to engage in sponsorships, analyses the processes that shape the relationships between them and their ‘godsons’ and describes the wider effects these experiences have on the sponsors’ lives and viewpoints. Analyzing the data in light of theoretical approaches from critical migration and refugee studies as well as feminist debates about gender and care, the concept of ‘intimate solidarity’ is proposed to understand the gendered and racialized dynamics that surround these sponsorship arrangements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ataç, I. (2015). Freiwilligenarbeit als Notnagel oder Neuformulierung der Zivilgesellschaft? Kurswechsel, 4, 80–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bargetz, B. (2014). Jenseits emotionalier Eindeutigkeiten. Überlegungen zu einer politischen Grammatik der Gefühle. In A. Baier, C. Binswager, J. Häberlein, Y. Nay, & A. Zimmermann (Eds.), Affekt und Geschlecht: Eine einführende Anthologie. Wien: Zaglossus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2004). Compassion: The Culture and Politics of an Emotion. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. (1999). Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Varela, M., & Heinemann, A. (2016). Mitleid, Paternalismus, Solidarität. Zur Rolle von Affekten in der politisch-kulturellen Arbeit. In M. Ziese & C. Gritschke (Eds.), Geflüchtete und Kulturelle Bildung. Formate und Konzepte für ein neues Praxisfeld. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review,43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as Buzzword. A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful. Feminist Theory,9(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, M., Hibbins, R., Howson, R., & Pease, B. (Eds.). (2009). Migrant Men. Critical Studies of Masculinities and the Migration Experience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, A. (2004). ‘It’s Almost Like I Have a Job but I Don’t Get Paid’: Fathers at Home Reconfiguring Work, Care and Masculinity. Fathering: A Journal of Theory, Research, and Practice About Men as Fathers,2, 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. (2015). Caring Masculinities: Theorizing an Emerging Concept. Men and Masculinities,19(3), 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, S. (2017). In the Name of Women’s Rights. The Rise of Femonationalism. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2005). Compassion and Repression: The Moral Economy of Immigration Policies in France. Cultural Anthropology,20(3), 362–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, R. (2013). When Charity Does Not Begin at Home: Exploring the British Socioeconomic Economy of Compassion. Sociological Research Online,18(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. (2015). “Here, Man Is Nothing!”, Gender and Policy in an Asylum Context. Men and Masculinities,18(4), 468–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S., et al. (Eds.). (2017). Der lange Sommer der Migration: Grenzregime III. Hamburg: Assoziation A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laine, J. (2014). Debating Civil Society: Contested Conceptualizations and Development Trajectories. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law,16(1), 59–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascini, P., & van Bochove, M. (2009). Gender Stereotyping in the Dutch Asylum Procedure: “Independent” Men Versus “Dependent” Women. International Migration Review,43(1), 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The Complexity of Intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism Without Borders. Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, G. L. (1996). The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, J. (2003). Race, Ethnicity and Sexuality: Intimate Intersections, Forbidden Frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, U. (2000). Undoing the “Package Picture” of Cultures. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 25(4), 1083–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2013). Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, C. (2005). Protectors and Victims in the Gender Regime of Asylum. NWSA Journal,17(3), 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razack, S. (2004). Imperiled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilized Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages. Feminist Legal Studies,12, 129–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheibelhofer, P. (2017). It Won’t Work Without Ugly Pictures’: Images of Othered Masculinities and the Legitimisation of Restrictive Refugee-Politics in Austria. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 12(2), 96–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneebaum, A. (2014). All in the Family: Patriarchy, Capitalism, and Love. In A. Jónasdóttir & A. Ferguson (Eds.), Love: A Question for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossbern (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprung, A., Kukovetz, B., et al. (2017). Solidarität und informelle Bildungsprozesse Freiwilliger im Kontext der aktuellen Fluchtbewegungen nach Österreich. In L. Karas (Ed.), Migration und die Macht der Forschung: Kritische Wissenschaft in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Wien: ÖGB Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ticktin, M. (2006). Where Ethics and Politics Meet: The Violence of Humanitarianism in France. American Ethnologist,33(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Dyk, S., & Misbach, E. (2016). Zur politischen Ökonomie des Helfens: Flüchtlingspolitik und Engagement im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Prokla - Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft,183, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies,13(3), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakarias, I. (2015). The Production of Solidarity: A Case Study of Voluntary School Programs of Hungarian Ethnic Kin Support. In J. Kleres & Y. Albrecht (Eds.), Die Ambivalenz der Gefühle: Über die verbindende und widersprüchliche Sozialität von Emotionen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Scheibelhofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scheibelhofer, P. (2019). Gender and Intimate Solidarity in Refugee-Sponsorships of Unaccompanied Young Men. In: Feischmidt, M., Pries, L., Cantat, C. (eds) Refugee Protection and Civil Society in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92741-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92741-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92740-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92741-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics