Abstract
This chapter considers LQG optimal controls for input and state delayed systems. LQG controls use output feedback ones while LQ controls in the previous chapter require state feedback ones. State observers or filtered estimates are obtained from inputs and outputs to be used for LQG controls. First, finite horizon LQG controls are dealt with, which are fundamental results mathematically. Since they cannot be used as feedback controls due to the inherent requirement of infinite horizons associated with stability properties, infinite horizon LQG controls are obtained from these finite horizon LQG controls and discussed with their stability properties and some limitations. Then for general stabilizing feedback controls, receding horizon LQG controls, or model predictive LQG controls, are obtained from finite horizon LQG controls by the receding horizon concept, where their stability properties are discussed with some cost monotonicity properties. For input delayed systems, two different finite horizon LQG controls are obtained, one for a predictive LQG cost containing a state-predictor and the other for a standard LQG cost containing a state. They are obtained for free terminal states. State observers or filtered estimates are obtained from inputs and outputs for these two finite horizon LQG controls. From the finite horizon LQG controls, infinite horizon LQG controls are sought and discussed with stability properties and some limitations. Receding horizon LQG controls for input delayed systems are defined and obtained from the above two different finite horizon LQG controls. Appropriate state observers or filtered estimates such as standard Kalman filtered estimates and frozen-gain Kalman filtered estimates are discussed, which are used for LQG controls. Some conditions are investigated, under which the receding horizon LQG controls asymptotically stabilize the closed-loop systems. For state delayed systems, finite horizon LQG controls are obtained for two different LQG costs, one including single integral terminal terms and the other including double integral terminal terms. The solution is more complex as a cost becomes more complex. State observers or filtered estimates are obtained from inputs and outputs to be used for LQG controls. Then infinite horizon LQG controls are sought and discussed with their stability properties and some limitations. Receding horizon LQG controls for state delayed systems are obtained from the above finite horizon LQG controls for state delayed systems. Appropriate state observers or filtered estimates are discussed, which are used for LQG controls. Cost Monotonicity conditions are investigated, under which the receding horizon LQG controls asymptotically stabilize the closed-loop systems. It is shown that receding horizon LQG controls with the double integral terminal terms can have the delay-dependent stability condition while those with the single integral terminal terms have the delay-independent stability condition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aggarwal JK (1970) Computation of optimal control for time-delay systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 683–685
Anderson BDO, Moore JB (1979) Optimal filtering. Prentice-Hall International Editions, Englewood Cliffs
Athans MA (1971) Special issue on the LQG problems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 16(6):527–869
Bitmead R, Gevers M, Wertz V (1990) Adaptive optimal control: the thinking man’s GPC. Prentice Hall, New York
Delfour MC (1986) The linear-quadratic optimal control problem with delays in state and control variables: a state space approach. SIAM J Control 24(5):835–883
Delfour MC, McCalla C, Mitter SK (1975) Stability and the infinite-time quadratic cost for linear hereditary differential systems. SIAM J Control 13(1):48–88
Kailath T, Sayed AH, Hassibi B (2000) Linear estimation. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Kwakernaak H, Sivan R (1972) Linear optimal control systems. Wiley-Interscience, New York
Kwon WH, Han S (2006) Receding horizon control: model predictive control for state models. Springer, Berlin
Kwong RH (1980) A stability theory for the linear-quadratic-Gaussian problem for systems with delays in the state, control, and observations. SIAM J Control Optim 18(1):49–75
Kwong RH, Willsky AS (1977) Optimal filtering and filter stability of linear stochastic delay systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 22(2):196–201
Lewis FL, Syroms VL (1995) Optimal control. Wiely, New York
Lindquist A (1969) An innovations approach to optimal control of linear stochastic systems with time delay. Inf Sci 1(3):279–295
Lindquist A (1972) A theorem on duality estimation and control for linear stochastic systems with time delay. J Math Anal Appl 37(2):516–536
Lindquist A (1973) Optimal control of linear stochastic systems with applications to time lag systems. Inf Sci 5:81–124
Ni Y, Yiu KC, Zhang H, Zhang J (2017) Delayed optimal control of stochastic LQ problem. SIAM J Control 55(5):3370–3407
Park JH, Yoo HW, Han S, Kwon WH (2008) Receding horizon controls for input-delayed systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(7):1746–1752
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kwon, W.H., Park, P. (2019). LQG Optimal Controls. In: Stabilizing and Optimizing Control for Time-Delay Systems. Communications and Control Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92704-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92704-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92703-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92704-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)