Skip to main content

Framing the Debate: The Evolution of the European Union as an External Democratization Actor

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework

Abstract

Embedded in the Normative Power Europe framework, this chapter first identifies three critical junctures that are essential to understanding the approach the EU has developed with regard to its external democratization agenda: (i) the end of the Cold War, (ii) the 2004 EU enlargement to the East, and (iii) the events surrounding the Arab Spring in conjunction with the European economic crisis. Next, the chapter delineates four main dimensions of the contemporary EU approach to external democratization: direct programs and instruments, the indirect economic approach, international and regional coordinating approaches, and a multilevel approach with the member states.

The authors would like to thank Hester Mostert, MA student in the department of International Relations and International Organization at the University of Groningen, for her careful research assistance and diligence in the preparation of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While this chapter is predominantly concerned with the promotion of democracy and democratic principles abroad, at times it becomes impossible to distinguish the EU’s policy within this domain from the closely intertwined and supplementary policy of human rights promotion. Particularly in the beginnings of the EU’s external democratization efforts, these two were often treated as one, which is duly recognized in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Note that, for instance, the 1957 Treaty of Rome establishing the European Economic Community does not once mention human rights, democracy, or good governance. The term “rule of law” is referred to only once, in relation to discussing the ECJ’s jurisdiction (European Commission 1957).

  3. 3.

    There are, however, a few exceptions to this, which stem from the fact that from 1970 onwards, the European Communities began to develop somewhat of a foreign policy dimension in the form of the European Political Cooperation (EPC). While in general a rather weak instrument to coordinate foreign policy between the EC member states, some have pointed out that at times the EPC succeeded in recording some headway in promoting human rights and democratization, particularly during the Euro-Arab dialogue after 1975 and during the negotiations of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) (Harryvan and van der Harst 2004, pp. 160–62).

  4. 4.

    It is this distinction between the European Union’s attempt to shape the democratic normal as part of its enlargement and foreign policies that has preoccupied scholars discussing the European Union’s normative power. Most scholars agree that the lack of a concrete membership perspective severely inhibits the EU’s normative power, which the EU should duly realize, adjusting its norm diffusion mechanisms accordingly (Haukkala 2008).

  5. 5.

    Such a statement stands in stark contrast to statements on promoting democracy made earlier on. For instance, in what we call the period of “normative optimism” above, the European Union would link its democracy promotion to the development of the third country, primarily for the sake of delivering human rights, peace, and stability to the population of the third country. The European Union’s member states – and their respective societies – were considered only second (Ferrero-Waldner 2006).

  6. 6.

    While we predominantly focus on the EU’s efforts related to promoting democracy, it at times becomes difficult to separate these from the EU’s efforts to promote human rights and/or good governance. Due to these concepts being greatly intertwined, the EU at times approaches them jointly. We will duly acknowledge when this is the case.

  7. 7.

    NGO Law Monitor: Ethiopia, available at: http://www.icnl.org/research/monitor/ethiopia.html, accessed May 20, 2016

  8. 8.

    The European Union’s Relations with the Council of Europe, available at: http://www.coe.int/t/der/EU_en.asp, accessed May 25, 2016.

  9. 9.

    OSCE & EU, available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/vienna/eu_osce/index_en.htm, accessed May 20, 2016.

  10. 10.

    The European Union, available at: http://www.osce.org/networks/111481, accessed May 20, 2016.

  11. 11.

    Foreign & Security Policy, available at: http://europa.eu/pol/cfsp/index_en.htm, accessed May 15, 2016.

Bibliography

  • Amin, K. (2016) ‘First EU Ambassador to ASEAN Looks to Bolster Ties’, Jakarta Post, 27 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, C. (2011) ‘Remarks by EU High Representative Catherine Ashton on “The EU Response to the Arab Spring” at the Brookings Institution’, Washington, July 12, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., Pamuk, Y. and Stahn, A. (2008) Good Governance in the European Union, Berlin Working Paper on Integration 7 (Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A. and van Hüllen, V. (2014) ‘One Voice, One Message, but Conflicting Goals: Cohesiveness and Consistency in the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (1999) ‘Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe’, International Studies Quarterly, 43, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2001) ‘Social Construction and European Integration’, in Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K. E. and Wiener, A. (eds) The Social Construction of Europe (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi, SAGE Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2015) Draft Annual Report from the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to the European Parliament: Main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP (Brussels, Council of the European Union).

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Hollander, D., Marx, A. and Wouters, J. (2014) Integrating Human Rights in EU Development Cooperation Policy: Achievement and Challenges, Working Paper 134 (Leuven, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. (2013) ‘Normative Power as Hegemony’, Cooperation and Conflict, 48, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1957) The Treaty of Rome (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Wider Europe – Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: The Thematic Programme for the Promotion of Democracy and Human Rights Worldwide Under the Future Financial Perspectives (2007–2013) (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007a) Consolidated Texts of the EU Treaties as Amended by the Treaty of Lisbon (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007b). European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) Strategy Paper 2007–2010 (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: The European Union’s Role in Promoting Human Rights and Democratisation in Third Countries (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2012) Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the European Union (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2013) EU’s Response to the “Arab Spring”: The State-of-Play after Two Years (Brussels, European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities (1973) Declaration on European Identity (Luxembourg, European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council (1993) Conclusions of the Presidency (Copenhagen, European Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament (2015) The European Year for Development: Human Rights (Brussels, European Parliament).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrero-Waldner, B. (2006) ‘Remarks on Democracy Promotion’, in Democracy Promotion: The European Way conference, Brussels, December 7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, N. and Pardo, S. (2015) ‘Normative Power Europe Meets the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict’, Asia Europe Journal, 13, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, P., Mishra, P. and Spilimbergo, A. (2013) ‘Democracy and Reforms: Evidence from a New Data Set’, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harryvan, A. G. and van der Harst, J. (2004) ‘Learning Interdependence the Hard Way. The Netherlands, European Political Co-operation and the Oil Crisis, 1967-1977’, in Knipping, F. and Schönwald, M. (eds) Aufbruch zum Europa der zweiten Generation: Die europäische Einigung 1969–1984 (Trier, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haukkala, H. (2008) ‘The European Union as a Regional Normative Hegemon: The Case of European Neighbourhood Policy’, Europe-Asia Studies, 60, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde-Price, A. (2006) “Normative’ Power Europe: A Realist Critique’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurki, M. (2011) ‘Governmentality and EU Democracy Promotion: The European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights and the Construction of Democratic Civil Societies’, International Political Sociology, 5, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2006a) ‘European Union ‘Normative Power’ and the Security Challenge’, European Security, 15, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2006b) ‘Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menéndez, A. J. (2004) ‘Human Rights: The European Charter of Fundamental Rights’, in Carlsnaes, W., Sjursen, H. and White, B. (eds) Contemporary European Foreign Policy (London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi, SAGE Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Navari, C. (1993) ‘Intervention, Non-Intervention and the Construction of the State’, in Forbes, I. and Hoffman, M. (eds) Political Theory, International Relations and the Ethics of Intervention (Basingstoke, Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjursen, H. (2006) ‘The EU as a ‘Normative’ Power: How Can this Be?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E. (2008) European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World (Cambridge and Malden, Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, M. (2009) ‘Paradoxes and Contradictions in EU Democracy Promotion in the Mediterranean: Limits of EU Normative Power’, Democratization, 16, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powel, B. T. (2009) ‘A Clash of Norms: Normative Power and EU Democracy Promotion in Tunisia’, Democratization, 16, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodi, R. (2002) ‘A Wider Europe: A Proximity Policy as the Key to Stability’, in Peace, Security and Stability: International Dialogue and the Role of the EU, Brussels, December 5–6, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanova, T. (2009) ‘Normative Power Europe: A Russian View’, in Gerrits, A. (ed) Normative Power Europe in a Changing World: A Discussion (The Hague, Clingendael).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeberg, P. (2009) ‘The EU as a Realist Actor in Normative Clothes: EU Democracy Promotion in Lebanon and the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Democratization, 16, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukma, R. (2009a) Democracy Building in South East Asia: The ASEAN Security Community and Options for the European Union, (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukma, R. (2009b) ‘The European Union and Democracy Building in Southeast Asia’, in Democracy in Development. Global Consultations on the EU’s Role in Democracy Building (Stockholm, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1991) ‘America as a Model for the World? A Foreign Policy Perspective’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 24, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, L. (1996) The International Dimension of Democratization: Europe and the Americas (Oxford, Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. (2009) ‘The European Union: A Normative or Normal Power?’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 14, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (2001a) The European Union and the Promotion of Democracy: Europe’s Mediterranean and Asian Policies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R. (2001b) Democracy Promotion: The Case of the European Union Strategy, Working Document 167 (Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Holzhacker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holzhacker, R., Neuman, M. (2019). Framing the Debate: The Evolution of the European Union as an External Democratization Actor. In: Neuman, M. (eds) Democracy Promotion and the Normative Power Europe Framework. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92690-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics