Abstract
The concept of “customization” captures the extent to which member states adapt centrally decided policies during transposition. This chapter introduces the concept and its measurement. I discuss how research on “gold-plating” has treated fine-grained differences in transposition beyond compliance. I argue that this perspective tends to be both normatively and empirically one-sided. Hence, I propose that this diversity be conceptualized more generally as a phenomenon of vertical regulatory change. Accordingly, we can measure these changes along the dimensions of density and stringency, without simultaneously addressing the question of compliance. Comparatively measuring customization poses challenges in terms of data availability, casing, and measurement equivalence. The concept of customization can “travel” beyond the European Union, and across both quantitative and qualitative research approaches.
This chapter draws in parts from Thomann, E. and A. Zhelyazkova. 2017. Moving beyond (non-)compliance: the customization of European Union policies in 27 countries. Journal of European Public Policy 24(9): 1269–1288. Reprinted with the permission of Taylor & Francis Ltd., http://www.informaworld.com.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As opposed to indirect legal reform requirements (Treib 2014, pp. 23–24).
- 2.
Even in Thomann (2015a), I sought to separate the question of diversity in implementation from questions of non-compliance. The original concept of customization I proposed presupposed compliant transposition and only conceptualized situations in which member states added to EU rules. However, as Asya Zhelyazkova and I have argued (2017), I believe this conceptualization was too narrow. In this study, I only analyze cases of correct transposition where compliant member states go beyond the market-correction of EU minimal standards. However, Switzerland has implemented some rules more loosely than those stipulated by (or required by) the EU; and in principle, customization could, of course, result in non-compliance.
- 3.
They may also simultaneously pose unnecessary burdens on businesses.
- 4.
The literature on policy instruments features more dimensions that, depending on the research setting, might also be interesting to account for. For example, “formal intensity” refers to the consequentiality of non-compliant behavior (Adam et al. 2015). “Explicitness” refers to the degree to which policies formulate a direction of desired behavioral change (Thomann 2018). Extending the concept of customization to include these dimensions seems entirely plausible; however, I will leave this to future research.
- 5.
Additionally, formal intensity includes domestic enforcement measures, administrative and procedural capacities that influence the probability of effectively achieving substantial requirements and the consequentiality of non-compliant behavior (Adam et al. 2015; Knill et al. 2012). Customization occurs during legal transposition. Changes in formal intensity are therefore only captured if the EU Directive explicitly contains relevant provisions and in this study these changes are measured in terms of their restrictiveness at the legal transposition stage.
- 6.
I am particularly indebted to Asya Zhelyazkova for her patience and useful exchanges when exploring these issues.
References
Adam, C., Hurka, S., & Knill, C. (2015). Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19, 327–344 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1082262
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95, 529–546 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100
Angelova, M., Dannwolf, T., & König, T. (2012). How robust are compliance findings? A research synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 19, 1269–1291 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.705051
Atthoff, K., & Wallgren, M. (2012). Clarifying Gold-Plating: Better implementation of EU Legislation. Online resource. Swedish Better Regulation Council. http://www.regelradet.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Clarifying-Gold-Plating.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2018.
Bauer, M. W., Green-Pedersen, C., Héritier, A., & Jordan, A. (Eds.). (2012). Dismantling public policy: Preferences, strategies, and effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bauer, M. W., & Knill, C. (2014). A conceptual framework for the comparative analysis of policy change: Measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16, 28–44 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.885186
Bondarouk, E., & Mastenbroek, E. (2018). Reconsidering EU Compliance: Implementation performance in the field of environmental policy. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28, 15–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1761
Börzel, T. A. (2002). Member state responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40, 193–214 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00351
Davidson, N. (2006). Davidson Review: Final report. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/davidson_review281106.pdf. Accessed 7 February 2018.
Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe: EU harmonisation and soft law in the member states (Themes in European governance). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Franchino, F. (2007). The powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hartlapp, M. (2014). Enforcing social Europe through labour inspectorates: Changes in capacity and cooperation across Europe. West European Politics, 37, 805–824 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.919772
Hartlapp, M., & Falkner, G. (2009). Problems of operationalization and data in EU compliance research. European Union Politics, 10, 281–304 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116509103370
High Level Expert Group on Monitoring Simplification for Beneficiaries of ESI Funds. (2016). Interim Report: Conclusions and recommendations on Gold-Plating. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/system/files/ged/hlg_16_0008_00_conclusions_and_recomendations_on_goldplating_final.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2018.
Jans, J. H., Squintani, L., Aragão, A., Macrory, R., & Wegener, B. W. (2009). ‘Gold plating’ of European Environmental Measures? Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 6, 417–435 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1163/161372709X12608898676797
Kaeding, M. (2008). Lost in translation or full steam ahead: The transposition of EU transport directives across member states. European Union Politics, 9, 115–143 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507085959
Knill, C. (1998). European policies: The impact of national administrative traditions. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 1–28.
Knill, C., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2002). The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three Europeanization mechanisms. European Journal of Political Research, 41(2), 255–280 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00012
Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (1998). Coping with Europe: The impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of Public Policy, 5, 595–614 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769880000041
Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (2003). Modes of regulation in the governance of the European Union: Towards a comprehensive framework. European Integration online Papers (EIoP), 7(1).
Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2012). Governance institutions and policy implementation in the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a policy-making state? Policy dynamics in the EU (1st ed., pp. 309–333). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knill, C., Tosun, J., & Bauer, M. W. (2009). Neglected faces of Europeanization: The differential impact of the EU on the dismantling and expansion of domestic policies. Public Administration, 87, 519–537 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01768.x
Knill, C., Schulze, K., & Tosun, J. (2012). Regulatory policy outputs and impacts: Exploring a complex relationship. Regulation & Governance, 6, 427–444 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01150.x
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298 (1972). https://doi.org/10.2307/974990
Lugt, M. (1999). Enforcing European and national food law in the Netherlands and England. Lelystad: Koninklijke Vermande.
Maggetti, M., Afonso, A., & Fontana, M.-C. (2011). The more it changes, the more it stays the same? Swiss liberalization and regulatory policies in comparative perspective. In C. Trampusch & A. Mach (Eds.), Switzerland in Europe: Continuity and change in the Swiss political economy (pp. 205–223). Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
Majone, G. (1999). Regulation in comparative perspective. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 1, 309–324 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876989908412630
Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation. (2001). Mandelkern Group on Better Regulation. Final report. http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/better_regulation/documents/mandelkern_report.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2018.
Mastenbroek, E. (2005). EU compliance: Still a ‘black hole’? Journal of Public Policy, 12, 1103–1120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500270869
Mastenbroek, E., van Voorst, S., & Meuwese, A. (2016). Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 1329–1348 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1076874
Morris, R. K. A. (2011). The application of the Habitats Directive in the UK: Compliance or gold plating? Land Use Policy, 28, 361–369 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.04.005
Padgett, S. (2003). Between synthesis and emulation: EU policy transfer in the power sector. Journal of Public Policy, 10, 227–245 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000059017
Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2006). Implementing public policy. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 89–107, Vol. 125). Boca Raton: crc Press.
Radaelli, C. M., & Exadaktylos, T. (2012). Research design in European studies: Establishing causality in Europeanization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Radaelli, C. M., & Meuwese, A. (2009). Better regulation in Europe: Between public management and regulatory reform. Public Administration, 87, 639–654 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01771.x
Richardson, J. (Ed.). (1982). Policy styles in Western Europe. London: Allen & Unwin.
Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 21–48 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003846
Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C., & Mavrot, C. (2014). Confronting theories of European integration: A comparative congruence analysis of veterinary drug regulations in five countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16, 457–474 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2014.960244
Schaffrin, A., Sewerin, S., & Seubert, S. (2015). Toward a comparative measure of climate policy output. Policy Studies Journal, 43, 257–282 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12095
Scharpf, F. (1998). Negative and positive integration in the political economy of European welfare states. In M. Rhodes & Y. Mény (Eds.), The future of European welfare: A new social contract? (pp. 157–177). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scharpf, F. W. (1996). A new social contract? Negative and positive integration in the political economy of European welfare states (EUI working papers, 1996/44). Florence: European University Institute.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of Public Policy, 4, 520–538 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344046
Schmidt, S. K. (2008). Beyond compliance: The Europeanization of member states through negative integration and legal uncertainty. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10, 299–308 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802231016
Shapiro, M. (1999). Implementation, discretion and rules. In J. A. E. Vervaele & G. Betlem (Eds.), Implementation, discretion and rules (pp. 27–34, European monographs, Vol. 20). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Snijders, H., & Vogenauer, S. (Eds.). (2009). Content and meaning of national law in the context of transnational law. Berlin: Sellier European Law Publisher.
Steunenberg, B. (2007). A policy solution to the European Union’s transposition puzzle: Interaction of interests in different domestic arenas. West European Politics, 30(1), 23–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380601019639
Thomann, E. (2018). ‘Donate your organs, donate life!’ Explicitness in policy instruments. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9324-6
Thomann, E. (2015a). Customizing Europe: Transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22, 1368–1387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1008554
Thomann, E. (2015b). Is output performance all about the resources? A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of street-level bureaucrats in Switzerland. Public Administration, 93, 177–194 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12130
Thomann, E., & Zhelyazkova, A. (2017). Moving beyond (non-)compliance: The customization of European Union policies in 27 countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 24, 1269–1288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314536
Töller, A. E. (2010). Measuring and comparing the Europeanization of national legislation: A research note. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2), 417–444 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02058.x
Toshkov, D. (2010). Taking stock: a review of quantitative studies of transposition and implementation of EU law. Institute for European Integration Research, Working paper No. 01/2010.
Treib, O. (2004). Die Bedeutung der nationalen Parteipolitik für die Umsetzung europäischer Sozialrichtlinien (Schriften des Max-Planck-Instituts für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Vol. 51). Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag.
Treib, O. (2014). Implementing and complying with EU governance outputs. Living Reviews in European Governance. https://doi.org/10.12942/lreg-2014-1
Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of governance: Towards a conceptual clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 1–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/135017606061071406
Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. In M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R. C. Rist, & E. Vedung (Eds.), Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation (pp. 21–58, Vol. 4). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Versluis, E. (2003). Enforcement matters: Enforcement and compliance of European directives in four member states. Delft: Eburon.
Vink, M. P. (2002). Negative and positive integration in European immigration policies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.325522
Voermans, W. (2009). Gold-plating and double banking: an overrated problem? In H. J. Snijders & S. Vogenauer (Eds.), Content and meaning of national law in the context of transnational law (pp. 79–88). München: Sellier.
Windhoff-Héritier, A. (1999). Policy-making and diversity in Europe: Escaping deadlock (Theories of institutional design). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Windhoff-Héritier, A. (2001). Differential Europe: The European Union impact on national policymaking. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Zhelyazkova, A. (2013). Complying with EU directives’ requirements: The link between EU decision-making and the correct transposition of EU provisions. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 702–721 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.736728
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomann, E. (2019). Moving Beyond (Non-)compliance: Conceptualizing Customization. In: Customized Implementation of European Union Food Safety Policy. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92684-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92684-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92683-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92684-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)