Abstract
In this chapter, Johansson studies how digital quotations, such as tweets and video, are embedded in a news text. The analysis focuses on the characteristics and looks at the functions of the quotations in a single news text made up almost entirely of quotations. The communicative functions of these quotations vary from neutral (reporting information) to positive (praise/thanking) and negative (complaint/regret). They are organized in this way in different topical sections by a journalist who serves as a mediator between social media and readers. This type of news text is a political opinion review—a remix of quotations that establish relations cross-media. It represents polarized opinions in a struggle in the public sphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Moirand (2007, p. 12) defines news genres as “objectivisés” and “subjectivisés”—“objectifying and subjectifying” news genres. That is, she considers this a dynamic feature of news genres.
- 2.
The quotative clause is underlined, and the quoted content is in quotation marks.
- 3.
Not shown here for copyright reasons.
Source
Les réactions à la réforme des retraites ne se sont pas fait attendre. Article published 27.8.2013, updated 5.10.2016. Huffington Post (fr). Retrieved from April 20, 2018, from http://www.huffingtonpost.fr/2013/08/27/reactions-reforme-retraites_n_3824466.html
References
Adam, J. M. (1992). Les textes: Types et protypes. Paris: Nathan.
Adami, E. (2012a). The rhetoric of the implicit and the politics of representation in the age of copy-and-paste. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(2), 131–144.
Adami, E. (2012b). Mashing genres up, breaking them down: Habitus and literacy in the age of copy-and-paste. Linguagem em Foco/Language in Focus, 1, 25–42.
Adami, E. (2016). Multimodality. In O. Garcia, N. Flores, & M. Spotti (Eds.), Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 451–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Adami, E., & Kress, G. (2014). Introduction: Multimodality, meaning making, and the issue of “text”. Text and Talk, 34(3), 231–237.
Arendholz, J. (2015). Quoting in online message boards: An interpersonal perspective. In J. Arendholz, W. Bublitz, & M. Kirner-Ludwig (Eds.), The pragmatics of quoting now and then (pp. 53–69). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88.
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London and New York: A and C Black.
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bergmann, J. R., & Luckmann, T. (1995). Reconstructive genres of everyday communication. In U. M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 289–304). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Blum-Kulka, S. (1983). The dynamics of political interviews. Text and Talk, 3(2), 131–154.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007–2011. Journalism Practice, 7(4), 446–464.
Bublitz, W. (2015). Introducing quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act. In J. Arendholz, W. Bublitz, & M. Kirner-Ludwig (Eds.), The pragmatics of quoting now and then (pp. 1–26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Catenaccio, P., Colleen, C. M., De Smedt, G., Garzone, G., Jacobs, F., Macgilchrist, L., et al. (2011). Towards a linguistics of news production. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(7), 1843–1852.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Charaudeau, P. (1997). Le discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social. Paris: Nathan.
Chovanec, J. (2014). Pragmatics of tense and time in news, From canonical headlines to online news texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Claquin, F. (1993). La revue de presse: Un art de montage. Langage et Société, 64, 43–71.
Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: The case of news-interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 163–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge and Malden: Polity.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality. Chicester: Polity Press.
Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.
Deuze, M. (2017). What is journalism? Journalism, 6(4), 442–464.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. New Jersey: Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
DuBois, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Engelbretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation and interaction (pp. 139–182). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Erbe, J. (2007). “What do the papers say?” How press reviews link national media arenas in Europe. The Public, 12(2), 75–92.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fetzer, A. (2004). Recontextualizing context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Giaxoglou, K. (2017). Storying leaks for sharing: The case of leaking the “Moscovici draft” on Twitter. Discourse, Context and Media, 19, 22–30.
Gruber, H. (2013). Genres in political discourse: The case of the “inaugural speech” of Austrian chancellors. In P. Cap & U. Okulska (Eds.), Analyzing genres in political communication: Theory and practice (pp. 29–71). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Haapanen, L. (2016). Monologisation as a quoting practice: Obscuring the journalist’s involvement in written journalism. Journalism Practice, 11, 1–20.
Haapanen, L., & Perrin, D. (2017). Media and quoting: Understanding the purposes, roles, and processes of quoting in mass and social media. In C. Cotter & D. Perrin (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp. 424–441). London and New York: Routledge.
Hermida, A. (2013). #JOURNALISM. Digital Journalism, 1(3), 295–313.
Johansson, M. (2002). Sequential positioning of represented discourse in institutional media interaction. In A. Fetzer & C. Meierkord (Eds.), Rethinking sequentiality: Linguistics meets conversational interaction (pp. 249–272). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johansson, M. (2006). Constructing objects of discourse in the broadcast political interview. In A. Fetzer & E. Weizman (Eds.), Pragmatic aspects of political discourse in the media. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(2), 216–229.
Johansson, M. (2012). Political videos in digital news discourse. In A. Fetzer & L. Berlin (Eds.), Dialogue in politics (pp. 43–67). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Johansson, M. (2013). Remixing opinions: Video quotations and stances in video press reviews. Recherches en Communication, 39, 95–115.
Johansson, M. (2014a). Reading digital news: Participation roles, activities, and positionings. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 31–45.
Johansson, M. (2014b). Faktoista mielipiteisiin. Referointi verkkolehtien mediaesityksissä [From facts to emotions. Quotations in news articles and news videos]. In M.-L. Helasvuo, M. Johansson, & S.-K. Tanskanen (Eds.), Kieli verkossa. Näkökulmia digitaaliseen vuorovaikutukseen [Language in the Net. Perspectives to Digital Interaction] (pp. 149–176). Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Jones, R. H. (2009). Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 283–302.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2008). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge (original work published in 1996).
Landert, D. (2015). Reportable facts and a personal touch: The functions of direct quotes in online news. In J. Arendholz, W. Bublitz, & M. Kirner-Ludwig (Eds.), The pragmatics of quoting now and then (pp. 29–52). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Le, E. (2010). Editorials and the power of media. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
van Leeuwen, T. (2008). News genres. In R. Wodak & V. Koller (Eds.), Handbook of communication in the public sphere (pp. 345–362). Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Levinson, S. (1992). Activity type and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Luckmann, T. (1989). Prolegomena to a social theory of communicative genres. Slovene Studies, 11(1–2), 159–166.
Mast, J., Coesemans, R., & Temmerman, M. (2016). Hybridity and the news: Blending genres and interaction patterns in new forms of journalism. Journalism, 18, 1–8.
Moirand, S. (2007). Les discours de la presse quotidienne. Observer, analyser, comprendre. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Perrin, D. (2013). Linguistics of newswriting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Puschmann, C. (2015). The form and function of quoting in digital media. Discourse, Context and Media, 7, 28–36.
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Waugh, L. R. (1995). Reported speech in journalistic discourse: The relation of function and text. Text and Talk, 15(1), 129–173.
Weizman, E. (2008). Positioning in media dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
White, P. R. R. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of “reporter voice” news stories: Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context and Media, 1, 57–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Translation of article:
Reactions to the retirement reform did not take long
-
(a)
Politics. As expected, the retirement reform did not take long to gather comments. As soon as the announcement was made in Matignon [the Prime Minister’s office] everybody gave their commentaries. But if the timing of the decision was surprising, that is, only a few minutes after the consultation of the social partners, the reactions were usual.
In the ranks of the majority, there is a general satisfaction that is addressed to Jean-Marc Ayrault [Prime Minister]. There is even a competition in praises if one reads the commentaries of the spokespersons of the Socialist Party.
-
(b)
David Assouline
@dassouline
The Left shows that a reform can be fair, balanced and can allow us to make progress, for the Right, reform=hitting and regression
-
Frédérique Espagnac
@FEspagnac
:#Retirement JMAyrault [Prime Minister] proposes a structural, just and fair reform, allowing the finance of pensions in a sustainable and distributed way
-
(c)
This has what it takes: “The distribution [of costs] will save the system”, congratulates the First Secretary [of the Socialist Party] Harlem Désir.
During the evening, one opposing voice was heard: that of Marie-Noëlle Lienemann, who works for the left wing of the party: “We cannot accept that we have to pay for 43 years,” declares this senator from Paris.
As regards the ecological allies, they are very restrained. In a press release, the Ecologist Group in the Parliament “regrets” the absence of a global reform. But the ecological representatives are also pleased that “two red lines were not crossed”, notably relying on CSG [social charges (deductible from income tax)].
-
(d)
Opposition exposes pressure on taxes
As for the right, it is much more critical. Its responsible persons started to repeat the refrain after the announcement of the Prime Minister on Sunday night on France 2. Two perspectives have been chosen…
-
(e)
Sébastien Huyghe
@SebastienHuyghe
#retirement new tax increases and rise of cost of work consequences= unemployment increases and inefficient financing
-
Gérard Darmanin
@GDarmanin
Inequality between different #retirement systems public/private and financing by +taxes. Still +taxes #PS
-
And the critique of the socialist party’s “cowardice”.
-
(f)
Valérie Debord
@DebordValerie
#Retirement the only solution of the government is to add to pressure on taxes through cowardice and popularity seeking
-
Yves Jégo
@yvesjego
New costs for firms. No convergence between public/private. Decrease in pensions in the future. #Reform without courage
-
Resumed by Jean-François Copé interviewed on TF1 [television channel]: “The Prime Minister threw a masque and showed clearly that this was unfortunately not a reform of retirement, but simply a rise in taxes, a rise in social security charges that will take place instead of retirement reform”.
-
(g)
Protest September 10th is on
Social partners are also quite divided. While the CFDT [trade union] is content with the “achieved fair measures”, the president of Medef [employer’s organization], Pierre Gattaz, says in the Figaro [newspaper] that it is “a dangerous anti-reform”. This is also true for the CGT [labor union], but for totally opposing reasons. It [la centrale de Montreuil] says that it was not heard. “The Prime Minister did not care at all about our propositions” complains the Secretary, Eric Aubin. In consequence, the protest that it has planned for September 10th with Force Ouvrier [labor union] is on.
The Left Front is going to come to the protest. Jean-Luc Mélechon confirmed on France 2 [television channel] that his movement has asked [people to come to] protest.
-
(h)
Video: Evening news with Jean-Luc Mélenchon
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Johansson, M. (2019). Digital and Written Quotations in a News Text: The Hybrid Genre of Political Opinion Review. In: Bou-Franch, P., Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (eds) Analyzing Digital Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92662-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92663-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)