Abstract
The problem of how we eat is related to our view of nature, how we treat nature. And Eastern and Western views of nature for environmental ethics are different. In quest of an integral ethics, this paper contrasts, then combines, both traditions to develop new environmental and food ethics. In Edo-era Japan, farms, forest, wilderness, and mountains, were arranged in ways to keep the balance between nature and humanity. Proper distribution of the land and allocation of resources was arranged by a dedicated government, operating on an integral philosophy. The Edo people did not think that humanity was separate from Nature. This was their ethico-political background. By contrast, people today often feel unbalanced and cut off from nature. They suffer the threat of war, nuclear energy, and collapse of spiritual life. And, the problem of world hunger is just as urgent.
Western modernism and traditional Japanese thought differ in their views of nature; the former divides humans and Nature while latter considers them as one. This is Western dualism vs. Eastern holism, a mechanistic view of nature vs. an organismic view of nature. Hare’s method of separating levels of moral thinking offers a way to make a hierarchy of moral principles. Adopting such a moral hierarchy, ecological principles and intuitions would set limits to utilitarian models of human-centered modernism. Were conflict to occur between the humanist and eco-centrist levels, one could move the argument to the eco-holist level, and make a moral decision in consideration of both human and natural welfare. After all, while one can briefly separate humans from nature, in the long run, human welfare and Earth wellness cannot be separated; for if the natural environment were to decay, humanity could not survive. Thus, our ultimate criterion must lie in the welfare of the Earth.
It is hardly an exaggeration to say that more confusion is caused, both in theoretical ethics and in practical ethics, by the neglect of this distinction (between two levels of moral thinking) than any other factor.
R. M. Hare
Given the success of the Japanese people in intensively and densely inhabiting a limited and fragile environment over many centuries without destroying either its beauty (albeit partly marred by the devastating postwar industrialization) or its productivity, they may be exceptionally well qualified to take the lead in conserving an analogously small and fragile planet.
J B. Callicott
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baird Callicott, J. 1989. In defense of the land ethic. Berkeley: SUNY. (DLE).
———. 1994. Earth’s insights, University of California Press. (EI).
Callicott, J.B., and R.T., Ames. 1989. Nature in Asian traditions of thought. Albany: SUNY.
Callicott, J.B., and J., McRae, eds. 2014. Environmental philosophy in Asian tradition of thought. Albany: SUNY. (ATT).
Callicott, J.B., and M.E., Zimmerman, et al. eds. 1993. Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology. Upple Saddle River: Prentice Hall. (EP).
Ewing, A.C. 1965. Ethics. New York: A Free Press Paperbacks. (Ewing, E).
Hare, R.M. 1981. Moral thinking: Its levels, method and point, Oxford.
Mackie. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong, Penguin. London: Penguin Books, Mackie. (Ethics).
Singer, P. 1979. Practical ethics. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press, Tucker. Albany (PE). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2002. One world: The ethics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (OW).
Tucker, E.M. 1989. Moral and spiritual cultivation in Japanese neo-confucianism: The life and thought of KAIBARA EKKEN. Albany: SUNY.
Yamauchi, T. 2012. Three-level Eco-humanism in Japanese Confucianism. In Anthology of Tenth EWPC at Hawaii University, 2012.)(Forthcoming) (yama). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
———. 2014. The confucian environmental Ethics of Ogyū Sorai. In Callicott, J.B., and J., McRae, eds. 2014. Environmental philosophy in Asian tradition of thought, SUNY. (ATT). (yama). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Zimmerman, M., J.B. Callicott, M. Warren, G. Sessions, and J. Clarke, eds. 1993. Environmental philosophy: From animal rights to radical ecology. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Additional Sources
尾藤正英『江戸時代とは何か』(Bitô, M. What is Edo-age?, Iwanami).
九鬼周造「九鬼周造全集」岩波書店。(Kuki, C.W. Complete Works of Kuki Shûzô, Iwanami).
島田虔治『朱子学と陽明学』岩波新書.(Shimada, K. Chu-hsi learning and Yang-ming Learnoing, Iwanami,).
梅原猛『人類哲学序説』岩波新書(Umehara, T. 2013. An Introduction to the Integral Philosophy of Humanity. Iwanami) (Umehara, 2013).
渡辺京二『逝きし世の面影』小学館文庫、(Watanabe, K. Some Aspects of Past Japan。).
山内友三郎『相手の立場に立つ–ヘアの道徳哲学」勁草書房。(Yamauchi, T. 1991. Moral philosophy of R. M. Hare, Keisô-shobô).
山内友三郎「現代の危機と分度の哲学」、国際際二宮尊徳思想学会、論集V.2014 所載。(Yamauchi, T. 2014. Contemporary crisis and the philosophy of Bundo, in Anthology Nr. V of International Ninomiya Sontoku Studies (INSA).)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamauchi, T. (2018). Food Ethics Based on Three Level Eco-holism. In: Thompson, P., Thompson, K. (eds) Agricultural Ethics in East Asian Perspective. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92603-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92603-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92602-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92603-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)