Skip to main content

Zhuangzi and Agricultural Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Ethics in East Asian Perspective
  • 251 Accesses

Abstract

Paul Thompson (The agrarian vision. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, 2010) has developed a virtue-based view of agriculture, and claims that it is the key to environmental sustainability. This chapter aims to improve upon this agrarian view by exposing some of the theoretical defects inherent in it, and by showing how those defects may be overcome by incorporating some alternative ways of thinking about the man-nature relationship from the perspective of Zhuangzi’s philosophy. This agrarian, Dao-constrained, position is developed on the basis of a no-self thesis proposed in Cheng’s (Philosophy East and West 64:563–597, 2014) reading of the dream of the butterfly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From the website of Directorate-General of Budge, Accounting and Statistics of Executive Yuan in Taiwan.

  2. 2.

    The original text of the quoted paper uses the Wade-Giles spelling system. Here I adopt a more commonly used Pin-Ying system. So for example “Tao” is spelled as “Dao”, and “Te” as “De”. The same goes for “Chuang Tzu”, to be spelled as “Zhuangzi”, etc.

  3. 3.

    The writing of Zhuangzi is classified into three categories: inner, outer, and miscellaneous chapters. The first category, which contains seven chapters, are widely believed to be written by Zhuangzi himself, while the other two categories written by his followers.

  4. 4.

    「至人無己」:appears in Chap. 1 of the Zhuangzi.

  5. 5.

    A more extended treatment is in my unpublished manuscript entitled “Personal Identity and Survival in the Zhuangzi”.

  6. 6.

    天地與我並生,而萬物與我為一(齊物論)

  7. 7.

    天地一指也,萬物一馬也(齊物論)

  8. 8.

    指窮於為薪,火傳也,不知其盡也(養生主)

  9. 9.

    This quoted paragraph appears in outer chapters, which are likely to be written not by Zhuangzi himself, but by his followers. So instead of saying that this paragraph expresses Zhuangzi’s idea, I describe it as stating a “Zhuangzian” view.

References

  • Callicott, B. 1987. The conceptual foundations of the land ethic. In Companion to a Sand County Almanac: Interpretive and Critical Essays, ed. B. Callicott. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K.Y. 2014. Self and the dream of the butterfly in the Zhuangzi. Philosophy East and West 64: 563–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. n.d. Personal identity and survival in the Zhuangzi. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. 1980. Taoism and ecology. Environmental Ethics 2: 73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, V.D. 1995. The Other Greeks: The Family Farm and the Agrarian Roots of Western Civilization. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P.K. 1983. Taoism and the foundations of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 5: 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. 2010. Surviving death. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Loy, D. 1997. Loving the world as our own body: The nondualist ethics of Taoism, Buddhism and deep ecology. Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology 1 (3): 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHarg, I.L. 1969. Design with Nature. Turtleback Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, D. 2011. Book review: Paul B. Thompson. The agrarian vision: Sustainability and environmental ethics. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 1 (3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. 2010. The agrarian vision. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. 1968. The complete works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. 1967. The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science 155: 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and substance. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollheim, R. 1984. The thread of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The completion of this paper is made possible by the generous support of a research grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (106-2410-H-010-014-MY3). Earlier versions of this paper were presented at Kyoto University, National Taiwan University, National Tung-Hua University, where I received helpful feedback from the audiences. Special thanks go to Paul Thompson and Kirill Thompson for their encouragement and feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cheng, KY. (2018). Zhuangzi and Agricultural Ethics. In: Thompson, P., Thompson, K. (eds) Agricultural Ethics in East Asian Perspective. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92603-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics