Skip to main content

Potential Clinical Advantages of Drug-Coated Balloon in Specific Clinical Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Drug-Coated Balloons

Abstract

New generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown excellent results regarding rates of in-stent restenosis. Nevertheless limitations of DES still exist and include concerns about stent thrombosis, increased bleeding risk due to prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, and limited access for future coronary bypass grafting. Not only these limitations, but also the increase of complex percutaneous coronary interventions as well as the establishment of hybrid revascularization strategies have led to the development of drug coated balloons (DCB). These interventional devices provide mechanical expansion to a coronary stenosis and deliver antiproliferative drugs without leaving permanent metal scaffolds behind. While there is already robust evidence for an indication of DCB angioplasty in the treatment of metallic in-stent restenosis, further clinical scenarios have been investigated for the use of DCB with promising results for some of them. Current data on clinical scenarios with potential advantages of DCB angioplasty are summarized in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent study group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Griffin J, Leon MB. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis. A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996;94:1247–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smits PC, Kedhi E, Royaards KJ, Joesoef KS, Wassing J, Rademaker-Havinga TA, McFadden E. 2-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary revascularization in daily practice. Compare (comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V stent with the paclitaxel eluting taxus liberte stent in all-comers: a randomized open label trial). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stone GW, Moses JW, Ellis SG, Schofer J, Dawkins KD, Morice MC, Colombo A, Schampaert E, Grube E, Kirtane AJ, Cutlip DE, Fahy M, Pocock SJ, Mehran R, Leon MB. Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:998–1008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akiyama T, Moussa I, Reimers B, Ferraro M, Kobayashi Y, Blengino S, Di Francesco L, Finci L, Di Mario C, Colombo A. Angiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels: a comparison with coronary stenting of large vessels. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1610–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ardissino D, Cavallini C, Bramucci E, Indolfi C, Marzocchi A, Manari A, Angeloni G, Carosio G, Bonizzoni E, Colusso S, Repetto M, Merlini PA, Investigators S-S. Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:2727–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cannon LA, Simon DI, Kereiakes D, Jones J, Mehran R, Kusano H, Zhang Z, Lombardi W, James Fleischhauer F, Costa MA. The XIENCE nano everolimus eluting coronary stent system for the treatment of small coronary arteries: the spirit small vessel trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80:546–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koskinas KC, Chatzizisis YS, Antoniadis AP, Giannoglou GD. Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1337–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T, Reimers B, Di Mario C, Wong ND, Colombo A. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1630–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortese B, Micheli A, Picchi A, Coppolaro A, Bandinelli L, Severi S, Limbruno U. Paclitaxel-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent during PCI of small coronary vessels, a prospective randomised clinical trial. The PICCOLETO study. Heart. 2010;96:1291–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Latib A, Colombo A, Castriota F, Micari A, Cremonesi A, De Felice F, Marchese A, Tespili M, Presbitero P, Sgueglia GA, Buffoli F, Tamburino C, Varbella F, Menozzi A. A randomized multicenter study comparing a paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon with a paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels: the bello (balloon elution and late loss optimization) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:2473–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Latib A, Ruparelia N, Menozzi A, Castriota F, Micari A, Cremonesi A, De Felice F, Marchese A, Tespili M, Presbitero P, Sgueglia GA, Buffoli F, Tamburino C, Varbella F, Colombo A. 3-year follow-up of the balloon elution and late loss optimization study (bello). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1132–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeymer U, Waliszewski M, Spiecker M, Gastmann O, Faurie B, Ferrari M, Alidoosti M, Palmieri C, Heang TN, Ong PJ, Dietz U. Prospective ‘real world’ registry for the use of the ‘PCB only’ strategy in small vessel de novo lesions. Heart. 2014;100:311–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Unverdorben M, Kleber FX, Heuer H, Figulla HR, Vallbracht C, Leschke M, Cremers B, Hardt S, Buerke M, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Degenhardt R, Scheller B. Treatment of small coronary arteries with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter in the PEPCAD I study: are lesions clinically stable from 12 to 36 months? EuroIntervention. 2013;9:620–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siontis GC, Piccolo R, Praz F, Valgimigli M, Raber L, Mavridis D, Juni P, Windecker S. Percutaneous coronary interventions for the treatment of stenoses in small coronary arteries: a network meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1324–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Basavarajaiah S, Naganuma T, Latib A, Hasegawa T, Sharp A, Rezq A, Sticchi A, Figini F, Amato A, Colombo A. Extended follow-up following “full-metal jacket” percutaneous coronary interventions with drug-eluting stents. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:1042–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofma SH, van der Giessen WJ, van Dalen BM, Lemos PA, McFadden EP, Sianos G, Ligthart JM, van Essen D, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW. Indication of long-term endothelial dysfunction after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:166–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee CW, Park DW, Lee BK, Kim YH, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Park SW, Park SJ. Predictors of restenosis after placement of drug-eluting stents in one or more coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:506–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. D’Ascenzo F, Bollati M, Clementi F, Castagno D, Lagerqvist B, de la Torre Hernandez JM, ten Berg JM, Brodie BR, Urban P, Jensen LO, Sardi G, Waksman R, Lasala JM, Schulz S, Stone GW, Airoldi F, Colombo A, Lemesle G, Applegate RJ, Buonamici P, Kirtane AJ, Undas A, Sheiban I, Gaita F, Sangiorgi G, Modena MG, Frati G, Biondi-Zoccai G. Incidence and predictors of coronary stent thrombosis: evidence from an international collaborative meta-analysis including 30 studies, 221,066 patients, and 4276 thromboses. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:575–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giustino G, Chieffo A, Palmerini T, Valgimigli M, Feres F, Abizaid A, Costa RA, Hong MK, Kim BK, Jang Y, Kim HS, Park KW, Gilard M, Morice MC, Sawaya F, Sardella G, Genereux P, Redfors B, Leon MB, Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Colombo A. Efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy after complex PCI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1851–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Costopoulos C, Latib A, Naganuma T, Sticchi A, Figini F, Basavarajaiah S, Carlino M, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Naim C, Kawaguchi M, Giannini F, Colombo A. The role of drug-eluting balloons alone or in combination with drug-eluting stents in the treatment of de novo diffuse coronary disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:1153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rezq A, Zoccai GB, Latib A, Romagnoli E, Aprile A, Amato A, Modena MG, Colombo A, Sangiorgi G. Paclitaxel eluting balloon plus spot bare metal stenting for diffuse and very long coronary disease (PEB-long pilot study). Clin Trials Regul Sci Cardiol. 2017;27:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakazawa G, Finn AV, Joner M, Ladich E, Kutys R, Mont EK, Gold HK, Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Delayed arterial healing and increased late stent thrombosis at culprit sites after drug-eluting stent placement for acute myocardial infarction patients: an autopsy study. Circulation. 2008;118:1138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Guagliumi G, Costa MA, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Bezerra HG, Suzuki N, Matiashvili A, Lortkipanidze N, Mihalcsik L, Trivisonno A, Valsecchi O, Mintz GS, Dressler O, Parise H, Maehara A, Cristea E, Lansky AJ, Mehran R, Stone GW. Strut coverage and late malapposition with paclitaxel-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in acute myocardial infarction: optical coherence tomography substudy of the harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acute myocardial infarction (horizons-AMI) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:274–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vos NS, Dirksen MT, Vink MA, van Nooijen FC, Amoroso G, Herrman JP, Kiemeneij F, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, van der Schaaf RJ. Safety and feasibility of a paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:584–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Belkacemi A, Agostoni P, Nathoe HM, Voskuil M, Shao C, Van Belle E, Wildbergh T, Politi L, Doevendans PA, Sangiorgi GM, Stella PR. First results of the deb-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 6-month angiographic, intravascular, functional, and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2327–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Touchard A, Goicolea J, Sabate M, Alfonso F, Ruiz-Salmeron R, Bethencourt A, Gonzalo N, Miranda F, Garcia Del Blanco B, Jimenez-Mazuecos J, Melgares R, Martinez-Romero P, Hernandez-Garcia JM, Lezaun R, Bullones JA, Fernandez-Portales J, Rumoroso JR, Ortas R, Valdes M, Trillo R, Brugaletta S, Otzuki S, Hernandez Perez FJ, Alonso-Pulpon L. A randomised trial of paclitaxel-eluting balloon after bare metal stent implantation vs. bare metal stent in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (the PEBSI study). EuroIntervention. 2017;12:1587–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ali RM, Degenhardt R, Zambahari R, Tresukosol D, Ahmad WA, Kamar H, Kui-Hian S, Ong TK, bin Ismail O, bin Elis S, Udychalerm W, Ackermann H, Boxberger M, Unverdorben M. Paclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty and cobalt-chromium stents versus conventional angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stents in the treatment of native coronary artery stenoses in patients with diabetes mellitus. EuroIntervention. 2011;7:K83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mieres J, Fernandez-Pereira C, Risau G, Solorzano L, Pauletto R, Rodriguez-Granillo AM, Rubilar B, Stella P, Rodriguez AE. One-year outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention with three different revascularization strategies: results from the diabetic Argentina registry (dear). Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012;13:265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinaga DA, Ho HH, Zeymer U, Waliszewski M, Jafary FH, Ooi YW, Loh JK, Tan JK, Ong PJ. Drug coated balloon angioplasty in elderly patients with small vessel coronary disease. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;9:389–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxana Mehran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farhan, S., Vogel, B., Mehran, R. (2019). Potential Clinical Advantages of Drug-Coated Balloon in Specific Clinical Settings. In: Cortese, B. (eds) Drug-Coated Balloons . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92600-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92600-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92599-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92600-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics