Skip to main content

Adaptive Management in Social Ecological Systems: Taming the Wicked?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Sustainable Philosophy—The Work of Bryan Norton
  • 343 Accesses

Abstract

In many publications, Bryan Norton has proposed hierarchical systems theory to understand and manage complex environmental conservation and sustainability problems. In doing so, Norton drew from the decision science and planning theory literature to frame persistent environmental problems, ranging from Herbert Simon’s un-programmed decisions to Horst Rittel and Melvin Webber’s wicked problems. Norton pioneered the development of an adaptive management framework to guide a community and valued-based pragmatic and discursive approach for continually solving and re-solving the wicked environmental management problems. In this chapter, I highlight important ingredients of Norton’s adaptive management framework and synthesize some of the key findings that resulted from applying some of the key elements of Norton’s adaptive management framework in the field setting of addressing the “wicked” problem of tropical deforestation in Tanzania, Vietnam and Peru through a MacArthur Foundation funded project (2006–2011). The following specific problem formulation and valuation issues are explored in this chapter: space-time boundaries; identification of stakeholder values; weights on stakeholder values; and decision rule choice. We discovered that many wicked problems surrounding environmental management persist in the field settings due to the stakeholder power asymmetries, conflicting values, politics of scale across different space time horizons and institutional inertia. I propose that institutional designs and governance processes operating at different levels of the space-time hierarchy—ranging from a person’s ambit to their community, city, state, country and planetary scales—must also be examined and addressed for adaptive management in social ecological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abaulsamh, R.A., B. Carlin, and R.R. McDaniel Jr. 1990. Problem structuring heuristics in strategic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45 (2): 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, D.L., A.B. Anderson, M. Oakes, and M.R. Fraser. 1994. Environmental equity: The demographics of dumping. Demography 31 (2): 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, C.J. 2002. Humble analysis: The practice of joint fact-finding. Westport: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W.M., and M.V. Wells. 2002. The politics and reality of environmental justice: A history and considerations for public administrators and policy makers. Public Administration Review 62 (6): 688–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J.T., E.J. Henig, and M.I. Henig. 1998. Objectivity and subjectivity in the decision-making process. Annals of Operations Research 80: 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, F.H.J.M., D. Huitema, and L.J. O’Toole (eds.). 1998. Participation and the quality of environmental decision making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. 2001. Wicked problems and social complexity. http://cognexus.org/wpf/wickedproblems.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.

  • Corner, J., J. Buchanan, and M. Henig. 2001. Dynamic decision problem structuring. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 10 (3): 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P., and D.L. Anderton. 2000. Demographics of dumping II: A national environmental equity survey and the distribution of hazardous materials handlers. Demography 37 (4): 461–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeGrace, P., and L.H. Stahl. 1990. Wicked problems, righteous solutions. Prentice Hall: Yourdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.S., and R.L. Keeney. 1994. Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values. Management Science 40 (8): 1035–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.S. 2002. Incorporating value trade-offs into community-based environmental risk decisions. Environmental Values 11: 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.S., and L. Failing. 2002. Using decision analysis to encourage sound deliberation: Water use planning in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (3): 492–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.S., S. Lichtenstein, and P. Slovic. 1993. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 7: 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R.S., T. McDaniels, and D. Fields. 2001. Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environmental decisions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 20 (3): 415–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanne, T. 2001. Intelligent strategies for meta multiple criteria decision making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henig, M.I., and J.T. Buchanan. 1996. Solving MCDM problems: Process concepts. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 5 (1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P.D., and B.G. Norton. 2012. Thinking like a planet. In Ethical adaptation to climate change: Human virtue of the future, ed. A. Thompson and J. Bendik-Keymer, 317–344. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P.D., W.M. Adams, J.P. Brosius, A. Zia, N. Bariola, and J.L. Dammert. 2011. Acknowledging conservation trade-offs and embracing complexity. Conservation Biology 25 (2): 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C.L., and Yoon. K. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58–191). Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I., and L. Mann. 1977. Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1982. The psychology of preferences. Scientific American 246: 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1988. Risk and rationality: Can normative and descriptive analysis be reconciled?. College Park, MD: Institute of Philosophy and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J.L. Knetsch, and V.K. Smith. 1992. Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. 1988. Building models of values. European Journal of Operational Research 37 (2): 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value focused thinking. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. 1996. Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 92 (3): 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with multiple objectives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1949. A sand county Almanac. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, T.O., P.D. Hirsch, T.C. Trung, A.N. Songorwa, A. Kinzig, B. Monteferri, D. Mutekanga, H. Van Thang, J.L. Dammert, M. Pulgar-Vidal, and M. Welch-Devine. 2011. Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144 (3): 966–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., D. Raisinghani, and A. Theoret. 1976. The structure of ‘unstructured’ decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (2): 246–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar. 2006. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12 (2): 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 1994. Toward unity among environmentalists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 2003. Searching for sustainability: Interdisciplinary essays in the philosophy of conservation biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 2005. Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G. 2015. Sustainable values, sustainable change: A guide to environmental decision making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., and A. Steinemann. 2001. Environmental values and adaptive management. Environmental Values 10: 473–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., and B. Hannon. 1997. Environmental values: A place-based theory. Environmental Ethics 19: 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., and B. Hannon. 1998. Democracy and sense of place values in environmental policy. Philosophy and Geography 3: 119–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., and D. Noonan. 2007. Ecology and valuation: big changes needed. Ecological Economics 63 (4): 664–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B.G., and R.E. Ulanowicz. 1992. Scale and biodiversity policy: A hierarchical approach. Ambio 1992 (May 1): 244–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W., and J. Moffat. 1997. Developing models of decision making. Journal of the Operational Research Society 48 (5): 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H.W.J., and M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sager, T. 1997. Planning and the liberal paradox: A democratic dilemma in social choice. Journal of Planning Literature 12: 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1973. The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence 4 (3–4): 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. 1982. Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taket, A., and L. White. 1997. Wanted: Dead OR alive—ways of using problem structuring methods in community OR. International Transactions in Operational Research 4 (2): 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taquino, M.C., D. Parisi, and D.A. Gill. 2002. Units of analysis and the environmental justice hypothesis: The case of industrial hog farms. Social Science Quarterly 83 (1): 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 1944. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterfeldt, D.V., and W. Edwards. 1986. Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, R.N., and M. Pidd. 1981. Problem structuring—a literature review. Journal of the Operational Research Society 32 (3): 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G., and P. Goodwin. 1999. Value elicitation for personal consequential decisions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 8 (1): 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. 1979. Second-order game problem: decision dynamics in gaming phenomena. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 27: 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A. 2013. Post-kyoto climate governance: Confronting the politics of scale, ideology, and knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A., S. Kauffman, and S. Niiranen. 2012. The prospects and limits of algorithms in simulating creative decision making. Emergence: Complexity and Organization (E:CO)—An International Transdisciplinary Journal of Complex Social Systems 14 (3): 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A., B.G. Norton, S.S. Metcalf, P.D. Hirsch, and B.M. Hannon. 2014. Spatial discounting, place attachment, and environmental concern: Toward an ambit-based theory of sense of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40: 283–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A., P. Hirsch, H.V. Thang, T.C. Trung, S. O’Connor, T. McShane, P. Brosius, and B.G. Norton. 2015. Eliciting inter-temporal value trade-offs: A deliberative multi-criteria analysis of Vietnam’s Bai Tu Long national park management scenarios. IAFOR Journal of Sustainability, Energy and the Environment 2 (1): 41–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zia, A., P. Hirsch, A.N. Songorwa, D.R. Mutekanga, S. O’Connor, T. McShane, P. Brosius, and B.G. Norton. 2011. Cross-scale value trade-offs in managing social-ecological systems: The politics of scale in Ruaha national park, Tanzania. Ecology and Society 16 (4): 7. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04375-160407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asim Zia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zia, A. (2018). Adaptive Management in Social Ecological Systems: Taming the Wicked?. In: Sarkar, S., Minteer, B. (eds) A Sustainable Philosophy—The Work of Bryan Norton. The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92597-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics