Small Modular Reactors, the Next Big Renewable Energy Source

  • Bahman Zohuri


Policy Exchange’s Energy and Environment Unit conducts innovative and independent policy research into a wide range of environmental, infrastructure, and regulatory challenges. Our objectives are to influence policy making and to shape debate. We produce publications, organize events, and use the media to promote our findings and policy proposals. A key focus of our work is to identify ways to tackle environmental challenges effectively while minimizing adverse impact on living standards. We promote well-designed regulation to exploit the power of markets to achieve environmental outcomes innovatively and cost-effectively.


Small Modular Reactors (SMR) Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) New Energy And Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Supercritical Water Reactor (SCWR) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Zohuri, B. “Nuclear Energy for Hydrogen Generation through Intermediate Heat Exchangers: A Renewable Source of Energy” Springer Publishing Company, Jul 15, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rooney Matt, “Small Modular Reactors, The next big thing in energy?”, Policy Exchange 2017,
  3. 3.
    Annual Report 2014,” Gen IV International Forum, Nuclear Energy Agency, 2014.
  4. 4.
    “A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems,” U.S. Department of Energy, GIF-002-00, December 2002
  5. 5.
    B. Kallman, “The Very High Temperature Reactor,” Physics 241, Stanford University, Winter 2013.
  6. 6.
    G. Roberts, “Nuclear Reactor Basics and Designs for the Future,” Physics 241, Winter 2013.
  7. 7.
    G. Locatelli, M. Mancini, and N. Todeschini, “Generation IV nuclear reactors: current status and future prospects.” Energy Policy 61, 1503 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper, Mark, “Small modular reactors and the future of nuclear power in the United States”, published in Elsevier at
  9. 9.
    Cooper M. Public risk, private profit, ratepayer cost, utility imprudence: advanced cost recovery for reactor construction creates another nuclear fiasco, not a renaissance; 2013. March.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Downey J. Westinghouse slows small reactor development. Charlotte Bus J2014. February.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Electric Energy Online. B&W announces restructuring of small modular reac-tor program 2014. April 14Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akikur RK, et al. Comparative study of stand-alone and hybrid solar energy systems suitable for off-grid rural electrification: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013:27Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Litvak A. Westinghouse backs off small nuclear plants. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette 2014. February 1.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Eg (CH)n tar sands or (CH1.5)n heavy crude to (CH2)n transport fuel. Upgrading heavy crude oil and tar sands requires 3 to 4 kilograms of hydrogen per barrel (159 liters) of product.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    In thermal terms @ 121 MJ/kg: 8470 PJ, equivalent to all of US nuclear electricityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New MexicoGalaxy Advanced Engineering, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations