Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap

  • Bahman Zohuri


The US Department of Energy (DOE) as part of its activity prepared a report to Congress in April 2010, based on ongoing nuclear energy research and development roadmap among the national laboratories under auspices of DOE in conjunction with industry and companies involved in such activities. In this report, they best characterized the current prospects of nuclear power in a world that is confronted with a burgeoning demand for energy, higher energy prices, energy supply, a new source of renewable energy, and security concerns.


Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) Brayton Cycle Liquid Metal Fast Breeder Reactor (LMFBR) Combined Cycle (CC) 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Zohuri, B. “Hybrid Energy Systems: Driving Reliable Renewable Sources of Energy Storage” Nov 26, 2017, Published by Springer Publishing CompanyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zohuri, B. “Nuclear Energy for Hydrogen Generation through Intermediate Heat Exchangers: A Renewable Source of Energy” Springer Publishing Company, Jul 15, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zohuri, B. “Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants, An Innovative Design Approach”, 1st Edition, Springer Publishing Company 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zohuri, B. McDaniel, P. “Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: An Innovative Design Approach” 2nd Edition, Springer Publishing Company, 2018Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zohuri, B. “Application of Compact Heat Exchangers For Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency In Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: A Novel Approach” 1st Edition, Springer Publishing Company, Dec. 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zohuri, B., McDaniel, P. and De Oliveira, C. “Advanced Nuclear Open Air-Brayton Cycles for Higley Efficient Power Conversion”, Nuclear Technology, Vol. 192, October 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patrick McDaniel, Bahman Zohuri, Cassiano de Oliveira, “A Combined Cycle Power Conversion System for small modular LMFBRs” American Nuclear Transition, Summer 2014, Reno Nevada.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Economic and Employment Impacts of Small Modular Reactors, June 2010, Energy Policy Institute of the Center for Advanced Energy StudiesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas, S. Bradford, P., Froggatt, A. and Milborrow, D. “The economics of nuclear power report 2007“, Published by
  10. 10.
    The table about has been extracted from an Australian Study with the title “Water requirements of nuclear power stations”Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Another source of information is from the Union of concerned scientist with the title “Got water?”Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nuclear Energy, Research and Development Roadmap, Report to Congress April 2010, U.S. Department of Energy, Nuclear Energy DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill and Peterson, GE F404 low bypass ratio turbofan with afterburning, 1992Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    GE Energy Flex Efficiency 50 Combined Cycle Power Plant, e-brochure, 2012Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Horlock, J. H., Cogeneration-Combined Heat and Power (CHP), Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar FL, 1997Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mattingly, J. D. Elements of Gas Turbine Propulsion, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacPherson, R. E., J. C. Amos, and H.W. Savage, “Development Testing of Liquid Metal and Molten Salt Heat Exchangers”, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 8, pp 14–20, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fraas, A. P., “Design Precepts for High Temperature Heat Exchangers”, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 8, pp 21–31, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yarosh, M. M., “Evaluation of the Performance of Liquid Metal and Molten Salt Heat Exchangers”, Nuclear Science and Engineering, 8, pp 32–43, 1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Zohuri, P. J. McDaniel, and C. de Olivera, “Air Brayton Cycles for Nuclear Power Plants”, Nuclear Technology, Submitted for Review, April 2014Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kays, W. M. and A. L. London, Compact Heat Exchangers, 2nd Ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1964Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McDaniel, P. and De Oliveira, C, Zohuri, B., and Cole, J., “A Combined Cycle Power Conversion System for the Next Generation Nuclear Plant”, ANS Transactions, December 2012Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zohuri, B., McDaniel, P. and De Oliveira, C, “A Comparison of a Recuperated Open Cycle (Air) Brayton Power Conversion System with the Traditional Steam Rankine Cycle for the Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant”, ANS Transactions, June 2014Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson, D. G. and T., Korakianitis, The Design of High-Efficiency Turbomachinery and Gas Turbines, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ, 1998Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haywood, R. W., Analysis of Engineering Cycles, 4th Ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  1. 1.University of New MexicoGalaxy Advanced Engineering, Inc.AlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations