Skip to main content

Documenting Pharmaceutical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2018 Accesses

Abstract

Documentation of pharmaceutical care has been advocated for close to 30 years for a number of reasons, not least to enable patient follow-up of managed or resolved drug-related problems (DRPs). The first pharmaceutical care documentation was performed in the US, followed by the Netherlands and Sweden, and has also been performed in Canada, in additional countries in Europe and in Australia . The creation of DRP classification systems was necessary for a systematized documentation of pharmaceutical care , which in turn was facilitated by the development of computerized documentation instruments, incorporated into software programs. Statistics on documented DRP data and free text information may serve as educational material for continuing professional development , aimed at further improving the DRP detection skills. The documentation may also be used to get a deeper understanding of both causes and characteristics of DRPs and to demonstrate the potential societal cost savings of pharmaceutical care .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Schaefer M. Discussing basic principles for a coding system of drug-related problems: the case of PI-Doc®. Pharm World Sci. 2002;24(4):120–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Strand LM, Cipolle RJ, Morley PC. Documenting the clinical pharmacist’s activities: back to the basics. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988;22(1):63–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chase PA, Bainbridge J. Care plan for documenting pharmacist activities. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1993;50:1885–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown G. Documentation by pharmacists in the health care record: justification and implementation. Can J Hosp Pharm. 1994;47(1):28–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Canaday BR, Yarborough PC. Documenting pharmaceutical care: creating a standard. Ann Pharmacother. 1994;28(11):1292–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Gier JJ. The Electronic Pharmaceutical Dossier, an effective aid to documenting pharmaceutical care data. Pharm World Sci. 1996;18(6):241–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. van Horsen H, de Smet PAGM, Hermans HWA, van Mil JWF, Sessink FGM, Stutterheim KF. Registratie van farmaceutische patiëntensorg [Registration of pharmaceutical care] Dutch Pharm Weekbl. 1996;131:1410–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Mil JWF, de Smet PGAM. Zorgrecords in de praktijk [Care records in practice]. Dutch Pharm Weekbl. 2001;136:430–1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van Mil JWF, Tromp TFJ. Coding frequently asked questions during the pharmaceutical care process with the PASr system. J Appl Therap. 1997;1:351–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Horssen N. Leg zorg vast [Document care]. Dutch Pharm Weekbl. 2001;135:1098–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Gier JJ, Leendertse AJ. De, Nieuwe SOEP-codesystematiek [The new SOAP coding systematics]. Dutch Pharm Weekbl. 2002;137:540–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shen W, Wong B, Chin JY, Lee M, Coulter C, Braund R. Comparison of documentation of patient reported adverse drug reactions on both paper-based medication charts and electronic medication charts at a New Zealand hospital. N Z Med J. 2016;129(1444):90–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Westerlund LOT, Handl WHA, Marklund BRG, Allebeck P. Pharmacy practitioners’ views on computerized documentation of drug-related problems. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37:354–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Westerlund T, Gelin U, Pettersson E, Skärlund F, Wågström K, Ringbom C. A retrospective analysis of drug-related problems documented in a national database. In J Clin Pharm. 2013;35:202–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Westerlund T, Marklund B. Assessment of the clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacy interventions in drug-related problems. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009;34:319–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. American Society of Hospital Pharmacists. ASHP guidelines on documenting pharmaceutical care in patient medical records. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(7):705–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maes K, Bruch S, Hersberger KE, Lampert ML. Documentation of pharmaceutical care: development of an intervention oriented classification system. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(2):354–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Westerlund T, Brånstad JO. GPs’ views on patient drug use and the pharmacist’s role in DRP management. Pharm World Sci. 2010;32(5):562–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommy Westerlund .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Westerlund, T. (2019). Documenting Pharmaceutical Care. In: Alves da Costa, F., van Mil, J., Alvarez-Risco, A. (eds) The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92576-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92576-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92575-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92576-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics