Skip to main content

Economical, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes and Pharmaceutical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care

Abstract

This chapter outlines the Economical, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes (ECHO) model as a framework for the multidimensional classification of outcomes . Moving on from the traditional disease-oriented model, the ECHO model ensures that economic and humanistic measures are evaluated, as well as clinical variables. Consideration of all three outcome types is important when evaluating pharmaceutical care interventions through well-designed, rigorous trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rademakers J, Delnoij D, de Boer D. Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients” overall assessment of healthcare quality? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(4):326–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kozma CM, Reeder CE, Schulz RM. Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes: a planning model for pharmacoeconomic research. Clin Ther. 1993;15(6):1121–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kozma CM. Outcomes research and pharmacy practice. Am Pharm. 1995;NS35(7):35–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunter MJ. The role of the ECHO model in outcomes research and clinical practice improvement. Am J Manage Care. 1999;5(4):S217–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heneghan C, Goldacre B, Mahtani KR. Why clinical trial outcomes fail to translate into benefits for patients. Trials. 2017;18:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein RS, Sherwood LM. From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124(9):832–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kattan MW. ed. 2009. The Encyclopedia of medical decision making, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Velentegas P, Dreyer NA, Wu AW. 2013. Outcome definition and measurement. In: Velentegas P, Dreyer NA, Nourjah P, Smith SR, Torchia MM, editors. Developing a protocol for observational comparative effectiveness research: a user”s guide. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siaw MYL, Ko Y, Malone DC, Tsou KYK, Lew YJ, Foo D, Tan E, Chan SC, Chia A, Sinaram SS, Goh KC, Lee JYC. Impact of pharmacist-involved collaborative care on the clinical, humanistic and cost outcomes of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes (IMPACT): a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42(4):475–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernsten C, Björkman I, Caramona M, Crealey G, Frøkjӕr F, Grundberger E, Gustafsson T, Henman M, Herborg H, Hughes C, McElnay J, Magner M, van Mil F, Schaeffer M, Silva S, Søndergaard B, Sturgess I, Tromp D, Vivero L, Winterstein A. Pharmaceutical care of the Elderly in Europe Research (PEER) Group. Improving the well-being of elderly patients via community pharmacy-based provision of pharmaceutical care. Drugs Aging. 2001;18(1): 63–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordina M, McElnay JC, Hughes CM. Assessment of a community pharmacy-based program for patients with asthma. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21(10):1196–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadik A, Yousif M, McElnay JC. Pharmaceutical care of patients with heart failure. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;60(2):183–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sturgess IK, McElnay JC, Hughes CM, Crealey G. Community pharmacy based provision of pharmaceutical care to older patients. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25(5):218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramalho de Oliveira D, Brummel AR, Miller DB. Medication therapy management: 10 years of experience in a large integrated healthcare system. J Manage Care Pharm. 2010;16(3):185–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singhal PK, Raisch DW, Gupchup GV. The impact of in community and ambulatory care settings: evidence and recommendations for future research. Ann Pharmacother. 1999;33(12):1336–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng Y, Raisch DW, Borrego ME, Gupchup GV. Economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes (ECHOs) of pharmaceutical care services for minority patients: a literature review. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013;9(3):311–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hill-Taylor B, Sketris I, Hayden J, O”Sullivan D, Christie R. Application of the STOPP/START criteria: a systematic review of the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults, and evidence of clinical, humanistic and economic impact. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013;38(5):360–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ganguli A, Clewell J, Shillington AC. The impact of patient support programs on adherence, clinical, humanistic, and economic patient outcomes: a targeted systematic review. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:711–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Loh ZWR, Cheen MHH, Wee HL. Humanistic and economic outcomes of pharmacist-provided medication review in the community-dwelling elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016;41(6):621–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Meid AD, Lampbert A, Burnett A, Seidling HM, Haefeli WE. The impact of pharmaceutical care interventions for medication underuse in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(4):768–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmel M. Hughes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barry, H.E., Hughes, C.M. (2019). Economical, Clinical, and Humanistic Outcomes and Pharmaceutical Care. In: Alves da Costa, F., van Mil, J., Alvarez-Risco, A. (eds) The Pharmacist Guide to Implementing Pharmaceutical Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92576-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92576-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92575-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92576-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics