Skip to main content

Tending the Eurasian Garden: Russia, China and the Dynamics of Regional Integration and Order

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sino-Russian Relations in the 21st Century

Abstract

This chapter examines the public cooperation and hidden rivalry that have characterized Russian and Chinese-led efforts to promote Eurasian economic and security integration. Though both Moscow and Beijing have shared similar concerns about the role and influence of the United States in Central Asia, they each have championed their own preferred regional organizations as instruments of regional cooperation and influence, including the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation and the Eurasian Economic Union. Though the Central Asian states in the 2000s embraced the presence of multiple external patrons and regional organizations as part of their overall pursuit of multivector foreign policies, post-2014 Western influence in the region has declined, while Russian and Chinese efforts have intensified. However, the asymmetry in power between Moscow and Beijing has led Russia to increasingly accommodate and acquiesce to China’s Eurasian agenda, including the recent Belt and Road Initiative.

[W]e understand [that Central Asia is your backyard]. But you [Russia] are supposed after all to look after your own yard, water the flowers. Please excuse my frankness.

—Chinese official responsible for Eurasian policy1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature

  • Allison, Roy. 2004. Regionalism, Regional Structures and Security Management in Central Asia. International Affairs 80: 463–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Roy. 2008. Virtual Regionalism, Regional Structures and Regime Security in Central Asia. Central Asian Survey 27 (2): 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosio, Thomas. 2008. Catching the ‘Shanghai Sprit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia. Europe–Asia Studies 60: 1321–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aris, Stephen. 2011. Eurasian Regionalism: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bailes, Alyson J.K., et al. 2007. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beissinger, Mark R. 2007. Structure and Example in Modular Political Phenomena: The Diffusion of Bulldozer/Rose/Orange/Tulip Revolutions. Perspectives on Politics 5: 259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Michael E. 2011. Xinjiang and China’s Rise in Central Asia—A History. New York and London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Michael. 2016. Beijing’s March West: Opportunities and Challenges for China’s Eurasian Pivot. Orbis 60 (2): 296–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2009. Cooperation Gets Shanghaied: China, Russia and the SCO. Foreign Affairs [Online], December 14. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2009-12-14/cooperation-gets-shanghaied.

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2012a. Great Games, Local Rules: The New Great Power Contest in Central Asia. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2012b. In Central Asia, Public Cooperation and Private Rivalry. New York Times, June 8. Available at https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/09/opinion/in-central-asia-public-cooperation-and-private-rivalry.html.

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2013. The League of Authoritarian Gentleman. Foreign Policy [Online], January 31. http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/01/30/the-league-of-authoritarian-gentlemen/.

  • Cooley, Alexander. 2016. The Emerging Political Economy of OBOR: The Challenges of Promoting Connectivity in Central Asia and Beyond. Washington, DC: CSIS, October, at https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/161021_Cooley_OBOR_Web.pdf.

  • Crisis Group. 2011. Central Asia: Decay and Decline. Asia Report No. 201. Brussels: ICG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisis Group. 2013. China’s Central Asia Problem. Asia Report No. 244. Brussels: ICG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, Keith A. 2009. Economic Liberalism and Its Rivals: The Formation of International Institutions Among the Post-Soviet States. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Erica. 2011. Inside China Inc: China’s Development Bank’s Cross-Border Energy Deals. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragneva, Rilka, and Kataryna Wolczuk (eds.). 2013. Eurasian Economic Integration: Law, Policy and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurasianet. 2018. Tajikistan Resumes Building Turkmenistan–China Pipeline. January 31. Available at https://eurasianet.org/s/tajikistan-resumes-building-turkmenistan-china-pipeline.

  • FIDH. 2012. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A Vehicle for Human Rights Violations. Paris: FIDH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flikke, Geir. 2009. Balancing Acts: Russian–Chinese Relations and Developments in the SCO and CSTO. Oslo NUPI Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumagalli, Matteo. 2007. Alignments and Realignments in Central Asia: The Rationale and Implications of Uzbekistan’s Rapprochement with Russia. International Political Science Review 28: 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabuev, Alexander. 2015. Why Did It Take Russia So Long to Join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank? Carnegie Moscow, March 30. https://carnegie.ru/commentary/59554.

  • Gavrilis, George. 2008. The Dynamics of Interstate Boundaries. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieco, Joseph. 1988. Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization 42: 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights in China. 2011. Counterterrorism and Human Rights: The Impact of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. New York: HRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Future of the Liberal World Order: Internationalism After America. Foreign Affairs 90: 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2017. Direction of Trade Statistics. Available at http://www.imf.org/en/Data.

  • Kaminski, Bartłomiej, and Gaël Raballand. 2009. Entrepot for Chinese Consumer Goods in Central Asia: The Puzzle of Re-exports Through Kyrgyz Bazaars. Eurasian Geography and Economics 50: 581–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassenova, Nargis. 2012. Kazakhstan and Eurasian Economic Integration: Quick Start, Mixed Results and Uncertain Future. Russie.NEI. Visions 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotkin, Stephen. 2009. The Unbalanced Triangle: What Chinese–Russian Relations Mean for the United States. Foreign Affairs 88 (5): 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, Joshua. 2011. With Eye to Arab Spring, CSTO Strengthens Cyber, Military Powers. Eurasianet, August 15. Available at https://eurasianet.org/s/with-eye-to-arab-spring-csto-strengthens-cyber-military-powers.

  • Larson, Deborah Welch, and Alexei Shevchenko. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to US Primacy. International Security 34 (4): 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 2012. Who’s Socialising Whom? Regional Organisations and Contested Norms in Central Asia. Europe–Asia Studies 64: 1219–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Bobo. 2008. Axis of Convenience: Moscow, Beijing, and the New Geopolitics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukin, Alexander. 2014. What the Kremlin is Thinking: Putin’s Vision for Eurasia. Foreign Affairs 93: 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, Jason. 2004. Great Games: Russia and the Merging Security Dilemma in Central Asia. Paper Delivered to the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, Jeffrey. 2009. Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Lincoln A. 2012. The Color Revolutions. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nadine, Rebecca Louise. 2007. China and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation: 1996–2006. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikitina, Yuliya. 2009. Никитина Ю.А. ОДКБ и ШОС: модели регионализма в сфере безопасности [CSTO and SCO: Models of Regionalism in the Security Sphere]. Moscow: MGIMO and Navona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olcott, Martha Brill, Anders Åslund, and Sherman W. Garnett. 1999. Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Robert A. 2005. Soft Balancing Against the United States. International Security 30: 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peyrouse, Sebastien. 2017. The Evolution of Russia’s Views on the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Policy 24 (1): 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schenkkan, Nate. 2014. Band of Outsiders: How Sanctions Will Strengthen Russia’s Economic Clout. Foreign Affairs, August 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • South China Morning Post. 2015. “One Belt, One Road” Will Define China’s Role as World Leader. SCMP Leader, April 2. Available at http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1753773/one-belt-one-road-initiative-will-define-chinas-role-world.

  • Swaine, Michael D. 2015. Chinese Views and Commentary on the ‘One Belt, One Road Initiative.’ China Leadership Monitor 47: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsygankov, Andrei P. 2012. Russia and the West from Alexander to Putin: Honor in International Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vinokurov, Evgeny. 2012. The Customs Union and the Single Economic Space: Towards the Eurasian Economic Union. In EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook, ed. Evgeny Vinokurov. Almaty: Eurasian Development Bank.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Jisi. 2012. ‘Marching Westward’: The Rebalancing of China’s Geostrategy. International and Strategic Studies Report No. 73, Peking University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Richard. 2008. Beijing–Moscow Rift Over Georgia War Deepens. World Politics Review, September 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Huasheng. 2006. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization at 5: Achievements and Challenges Ahead. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4: 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Cooley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cooley, A. (2019). Tending the Eurasian Garden: Russia, China and the Dynamics of Regional Integration and Order. In: Bekkevold, J.I., Lo, B. (eds) Sino-Russian Relations in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92516-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics