Skip to main content

The Contingent Convertibles Pricing Models: CoCos Credit Spread Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contingent Convertible Bonds, Corporate Hybrid Securities and Preferred Shares

Abstract

The Additional Tier 1 contingent convertibles (AT1 CoCos) credit spread calculation is a challenging task considering numerous clauses embedded in this security. Apart from risk of trigger event occurrence, holders of AT1 CoCos are exposed to risks of coupon cancellation and call extension. The CoCos complexity is amplified by the fact that the triggering may be caused not only by the occurrence of contractually determined trigger events, but also by the behaviour of the supervision or resolution authority. In this chapter, the CoCo pricing models have been classified into market and structural models. The most prominent among the market models are credit derivatives and equity derivatives model. This chapter presents these models together with the implied CET1 volatility model in a more detailed manner as an example of structural approach. Final sections present our empirical analysis using a dozen of regressors for explaining ‘spread to Tier 2’ observable values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In fact, due to short position in equity put option, the CoCo bondholder has got both negative option delta and gamma.

  2. 2.

    See Sect. 1.3.5.3 of Chap. 1 for more on different conversion mechanisms.

  3. 3.

    See Sect. 1.3.5.6 of Chap. 1.

  4. 4.

    For more on solving stochastic differential equations: see Liberadzki (2016), Chapter 16, Section 16.2.2.

  5. 5.

    Total of CET1 + AT1.

Bibliography

References

  • Black, F., & Cox, J. (1976). Some Effects of Bond Indenture Provisions. Journal of Finance, 31, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhry, M. (2008). Credit Derivatives. In C. Alexander & E. Sheedy (Eds.), The Professional Risk Managers’ Guide to Finance Theory and Application. New York: McGraw Hill, part B.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Spiegeleer, J., Höcht, S., Marquet, I., & Schoutens, W. (2017). CoCo Bonds and Implied CET1 Volatility. Quantitative Finance, 17(6), 813–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Spiegeleer, J., Hoecht, S., Marquet, I., & Schoutens, W. (2016). The Impact of a New CoCo Issuance on the Price Performance of Outstanding CoCos. In K. Glau, Z. Grbac, M. Scher, & I. R. Zagst (Eds.), Innovations in Derivatives Markets: Fixed Income Modelling Valuation Adjustments, Risk Management and Regulation (pp. 405–419). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Spiegeleer, J., & Schoutens, W. (2012). Pricing Contingent Convertibles: A Derivatives Approach. Journal of Derivatives, 20(2), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie, D., & Singleton, K. J. (1999). Modeling Term Structure of Defaultable Bonds. Review of Financial Studies, 12, 687–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faux, Z. (2011, January 17). A Stock-Bond Hybrid That Flopped. Business Week, Issue 4212, pp. 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, E. G. (2007). The Complete Guide to Option Pricing Formulas. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R., & Turnbull, S. (1995). Pricing Derivatives on Financial Securities Subject to Credit Risk. Journal of Finance, 50, 53–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G., & Giang, L. (2012). A Modified Structural Model for Credit Risk. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 23, 147–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longstaff, F., & Schwartz, E. (1995). A Simple Approach to Valuing Risky Fixed and Floating Rate Debt. Journal of Finance, 50, 789–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquet, I. (2017, December). The Risk Management of Contingent Convertible (CoCo) Bonds. KU Leuven, Arenberg Doctoral School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1974). On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates. Journal of Finance, 28, 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penacchi, G. (2011, March). A Structural Model of Contingent Bank Capital. Working Paper. University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, M. O. (2012). Why Do Investors Buy Bad Financial Products? Probability Misestimation Preferences in Financial Decisions. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13, 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkens, S., & Bethke, N. (2014). Contingent Convertible (CoCo) Bonds: A First Empirical Assessment of Selected Pricing Models. Financial Analyst Journal, 70, 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Liberadzki .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liberadzki, M., Liberadzki, K. (2019). The Contingent Convertibles Pricing Models: CoCos Credit Spread Analysis. In: Contingent Convertible Bonds, Corporate Hybrid Securities and Preferred Shares. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92501-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92501-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92500-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92501-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics