Skip to main content

The Impact of Post-disaster Housing Reconstruction Policies on Different Beneficiary Groups: The Case of Bam, Iran

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees

Part of the book series: Sustainable Development Goals Series ((SDGS))

Abstract

Disaster management studies have demonstrated that housing reconstruction programs often lead to different levels of community recovery. Yet, insufficient knowledge still exists about how reconstruction policies and decisions produce diverse impacts among different social groups. The purpose of this paper is to explore why and how housing reconstruction policies impact households in different ways. This research focuses on low-income housing programs implemented in response to disasters. It examines post-disaster reconstruction policies through the lenses of a comprehensive body of knowledge about the evolution of housing policy in developing countries over the last seven decades. Using a set of indicators from pre- and post-disaster conditions among six household categories, the qualitative enquiry examines the housing reconstruction program conducted after the 2003 earthquake in Bam. Empirical results show that the scant attention to different categories of tenancy, families’ socioeconomic conditions, and demographic changes (before and after the disaster) led authorities to adopt housing reconstruction policies that benefited some groups of households, while having the opposite effect on others. Single-family house-owners, for instance, rebuilt their permanent houses quickly and resumed normal activities in a relatively short period of time. Members of extended families – who before the disaster relied on a complex social fabric based on proximity – were instead adversely affected by policies that allocated them a unit in a residential complex located in the city outskirts. Results reveal the inefficiency of the one-policy-for-all approach in housing reconstruction. The coexistence of a multiplicity of measures and programs can allow households to choose the solution that best fits their needs, conditions, and expectations. Findings also highlight a gap between general housing and housing reconstruction policies in developing countries. Pre-disaster policies must be constantly assessed to identify and understand their effectiveness and drawbacks in reducing vulnerabilities. Post-disaster reconstruction brings an opportunity to do this and ensure a sustainable development based on resilience enhancement and disaster risk reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (1993). Natural disasters. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. (2008). Mainstreaming disaster risk management. In Hazards and the built environment: Attaining built-in resilience (pp. 20–36). Londres: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aysan, Y., & Oliver, P. (1987). Housing and culture after earthquakes: A guide for future policy making on housing in seismic areas. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. R. (2012). The basics of social research. Belmont, USA: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, S. (1993). Rebuilding and resettlement, 9 years later; a case-study of the contractor built reconstruction in Yemen, following the 1982 Dhamar earthquake. IAAS. Post-war reconstruction and development unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. Humanitarian Policy Group, Network Papers, 43, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenstein, J. (2006). Challenges and risks in post-tsunami housing reconstruction in Tamil Nadu. Humanitarian Exchange, 33, 38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenstein, J. (2008). From Gujarat to Tamil Nadu: Owner-driven vs. contractor-driven housing reconstruction in India. Paper presented at the 4th international i-Rec conference: building resilience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenstein, J. (2010). Reconstruction approaches. In A. K. Jha, J. D. Barenstein, P. M. Phelps, D. Pittet, & S. Sena (Eds.), safer homes, stronger communities – A handbook for reconstructing after natural disasters (pp. 93–107). Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenstein, J., & Iyengar, S. (2010). India: From a culture of housing to a philosophy of reconstruction. In M. Lyons, T. schilderman, & C. Boano (Eds.), Building Back Better: Delivering people-centered housing reconstruction at scale (Vol. 163). Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, R. C. (1982). Long-term family recovery from disaster. Colorado, U.S: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna, R. (2010). Planning and designing post disaster transitional housing: The case of the Abruzzo (Italy) earthquake. Paper presented at the Proceedings TG63–Special Track 18th CIB World Building Congress, Salford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosher, L. (2008). Hazards and the built environment: Attaining built-in resilience. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R. (1978). Petty commodity housing or dweller control? A critique of John Turner’s views on housing policy. World Development, 6(9), 1105–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, R. (1989). Toward a cultural-systemic theory of natural disasters: the case of the Italian earthquakes of 1968 in Belize, 1976 in Friuli and 1980 in Campania-Basilicata. In Quarantelli & Peland (Eds.), Preparations for, Response to, and Recovery from Major Community Disasters (pp. 253–271). Newark, DE: University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comerio, M. C. (1998). Disaster hits home: New policy for urban housing recovery. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRED (2016). 2015 disasters in number. Retrieved from Belgium http://www.unisdr.org/files/47804_2015disastertrendsinfographic.pdf

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. London: Sage. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, C. H., Johnson, C., Lizarralde, G., Dikmen, N., & Sliwinski, A. (2007). Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat International, 31(1), 100–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (1977). Emergency shelter. Disasters, 1(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I. (1978). Shelter after disaster. Oxford: Oxford Polytechnic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, I., & Alexander, D. (2015). Recovery from disaster. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikmen, N., Elias-Ozkan, S. T., & Davidson, C. (2012). Comparison of Post-Disaster Housing Procurement Methods in Rural Areas of Turkey. Open House International, 37(1), 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallahi, A. (1993). Learning from the lessons of the post-earthquake reconstruction projects in Iran: An introduction. Macedon Digest, The, 8(4), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallahi, A. (2007). Lessons learned from the housing reconstruction following the Bam earthquake in Iran. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22(1), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayazi, M. (2012). Temporary housing experience after Bam Earthquake 2003. Tehran: Housing Foundation of Islamic Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayazi, M., & Lizarralde, G. (2013). The role of low-cost housing in the path from vulnerability to resilience. International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(3), 146–167. Retrieved from http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/56

  • Fayazi, M., & Lizarralde, G. (2013a). Temporary housing: an obstacle or an opportunity for enhancing community resilience in Bam, Iran In G. Lizarralde, J. Barenstein, G. Cardosi, & A. Oliver the 6th international i-Rec conferenceAscona, Switzerland L’Observatoire universitaire de la vulnérabilité and la reconstruction durable (Oeuvre durable); pp. 92-107 http://www.grif.umontreal.ca/i-Rec2013/conferenceIREC2013papers.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayazi, M., Kikano, F., & Lizarralde, G. (2015). The Impacts of Post-Disaster Reconstruction Policies on Different Categories of Households in Bam, Iran. Paper presented at the 7th International i-Rec conference, July 6-8 in the Bartlett Development Planning Unit, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., & Hosseini, M. (2008). Post-Bam earthquake: Recovery and reconstruction. Natural Hazards, 44(2), 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 132–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidellage, V., & Usoof, A. (2010). Scaling-up people-centered reconstruction: Lessons from Sri Lanka’s post-tsunami owner-driven programme. In M. Lyons, T. Schilderman, & C. Boano (Eds.), Building Back Better: Delivering people-centered housing reconstruction at scale (pp. 77–112). Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P., Smith, H., & Wang, Y. P. (2006). Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, A. K., Barenstein, J. D., Phelps, P. M., Pittet, D., & Sena, S. (2010). Safer homes, stronger communities. A handbook for reconstruction after natural disasters. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karunasena, G., & Rameezdeen, R. (2010). Post-disaster housing reconstruction: Comparative study of donor vs owner-driven approaches. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(2), 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, G. (2010). Decentralizing (re) construction: Agriculture cooperatives as a vehicle for reconstruction in Colombia. In M. Lyons, T. Schilderman, & C. Boano (Eds.), Building Back Better: Building Back Better: Delivering people-centered housing reconstruction at scale(pp. 191–214). Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, G. (2015). The invisible houses: Rethinking and designing low-cost housing in developing countries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, G., Johnson, C., & Davidson, C. H. (2010). Rebuilding after disasters: From emergency to sustainability. London and New York: Spon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., Schilderman, T., & Boano, C. (2009). Building Back Better: Delivering people-centered housing reconstruction at scale. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, M., Schilderman, T., & Boano, C. (2010). Building back better: Delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mangin, W. (1967). Latin American squatter settlements: A problem and a solution. Latin American Research Review, 2(3), 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskrey, A. (1989). Disaster mitigation: A community based approach.

    Google Scholar 

  • NDTF. (2014). The minutes of the National Disaster Task Force (NDTF) meetings on 03 April. 2004. Tehran: Ministry of Interior Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omidvar, B., Zafari, H., & Derakhshan, S. (2010). Reconstruction management policies in residential and commercial sectors after the 2003 bam earthquake in Iran. Natural Hazards, 54(2), 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. (1992). International finance and housing policies in developing countries. Cities, 9(2), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. (1994). Housing policy development in developing countries: The World Bank and internationalization, 1972–1993. Cities, 11(3), 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. (1995). The role of the World Bank in housing. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L. (1999). The disaster recovery process: What we know and do not know from research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafieian, M., & Asgary, A. (2013). Impacts of temporary housing on housing reconstruction after the Bam earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Foundation (2016). 100 resilient cities. Retrieved from http://www.100resilientcities.org/resilience#/-_

  • Statistic Center of Iran. (2003). Summary of Bam statistic. Tehran: Statistic Center of Iran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafti, M. T., & Tomlinson, R. (2013). The role of post-disaster public policy responses in housing recovery of tenants. Habitat International, 40, 218–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1967). Barriers and channels for housing development in modernizing countries. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 33(3), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDRO. (1982). Shelter After Disaster: Guidelines for Assistance. New York: United Nations Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR (2005). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Paper presented at the Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction (A/CONF. 206/6).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2012). How to make cities more resilient: A handbook for mayors and local government leaders. Geneva: UNISDR.

    Google Scholar 

  • World-Bank. (1974). Housing. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World-Bank. (1992). Housing: Enabling markets to work. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). California: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanetta, C. (2004). The influence of the world bank on national housing and urban Policies: The case of Mexico and Argentina during the 1990’s. London: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmood Fayazi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fayazi, M., Lizarralde, G. (2019). The Impact of Post-disaster Housing Reconstruction Policies on Different Beneficiary Groups: The Case of Bam, Iran. In: Asgary, A. (eds) Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92498-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics