Abstract
The Mediterranean migrant/refugee crisis is stressing the capacity and capability of the EU reception system to guarantee adequate standards of living to asylum seekers, as for the provision of housing, threatening the protection provided by the right of asylum. The study analyses the spatial phenomenon of reception centres, formally instituted by host countries to accommodate needy applicants of international protection during the asylum procedure, which are spreading in the European borderscapes to immediately supply “n. places” for the “n. arrivals”. Within the global challenge of housing and integrating migrants and refugees, the topic of reception centres is carried out characterizing the temporary status of the asylum seeker and the controversial nature of hospitality, affecting reception and its spatial practice. The mapping controversies method was used to read the spatiality of reception in the European and Italian contexts, where case studies were selected in the city of Florence. Results depict the heterogeneous spectrum of spatial solutions for reception, which reflects the lack of shared/qualitative standards and of strategic/contingency scenarios able to meet basic human rights and inclusive urban development. Finally, the study collected innovative spaces of reception, raising in the architectural discourse and looking at those directions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
100 Resilient Cities. (2016). Global migration: Resilient cities at the forefront. Strategic actions to adapt and transform our cities in an age of migration. http://action.100resilientcities.org/page/-/100rc/pdfs/Global%20Migration_Resilient%20Cities%20At%20The%20Forefront_DIGITAL%20%28High%20Res%29.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Aravena, A. (Ed.). (2016). Reporting from the front. 15th Mostra Internazionale di Architettura. Marsilio, Venezia.
Associazione per gli Studi Giuridici sull’Immigrazione (ASGI). (2016). Aida country report: Italy. http://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-download/aida_it_2016update.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Baumann, Z. (2005). Vite di scarto. Edizioni Laterza, Bari.
Betts, A. (2016). TED Talks: Our refugee system is failing. Here’s how we can fix it. https://www.ted.com/talks/alexander_betts_our_refugee_system_is_failing_here_s_how_we_can_fix_it. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Bishop, P., & Williams, L. (2012). The temporary city. London: Routledge.
Boano, C. (2017). The ethics of a potential urbanism. London: Routledge.
Bracci, F. (Ed.). (2012). Emergenza Nord Africa. I percorsi di accoglienza diffusa: analisi e monitoraggio del sistema. Pisa: Pisa University Press.
Brunon-Ernst, A. (2016). Beyond Foucault. New perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon. New York: Routledge.
Cachola Schmal, P., Elser, O., & Scheuermann, A. (2016). Making Heimat. Germany, arrival country. Berlin: Hatje Cantz.
Cairns, S. (Ed.). (2004). Drifting: Architecture and migrancy. London: Routledge.
Casanovas, L., Blanco, I., Galan, G., et al. (Eds.). (2016). After belonging. The objects, spaces, and territories of the ways we stay in transit. Zurich: Lars Müller.
Darling, J. (2009). Becoming bare life: Asylum, hospitality, and the politics of encampment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 27, 649–665.
Darling, J. (2016). Forced migration and the city. Progress in Human Geography, 41(2), 178–198.
Derrida, J. (2001). On cosmopolitanism and forgiveness. London: Routledge.
ECRE European Council on Refugees and Exils (2016). Wrong counts and closing doors. The reception of refugees and asylum seekers in Europe. http://emn.ie/cat_publication_detail.jsp?clog=1&itemID=2653&t=6. Accessed 14 October 2017.
EMN European Migration Network (2014). The Organisation of Reception Facilities for Asylum Seekers in different Member States. http://emn.ie/cat_publication_detail.jsp?clog=1&itemID=2653&t=6. Accessed 13 October 2017.
Eurocities. (2015). EUROCITIES statement on asylum in cities. http://nws.eurocities.eu/MediaShell/media/EUROCITIES%20stmt_asylum_May%202015.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
European Asylum Support Office (EASO). (2016). Guida dell’EASO alle condizioni di accoglienza: norme operative e indicatori. https://www.easo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Guidance-on-ReceptionConditions-IT.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
European Commission. (2016) Urban agenda for the EU. ‘Pact of Amsterdam’. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/themes/urban-development/agenda/pact-of-amsterdam.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
FRAME Project (2015). Reception and Detention Conditions of applicants for international protection in light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU. http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/5506a3d44.pdf. Accessed 14 October 2017.
Freise, H. (2004). Spaces of hospitality. Angelaki, 9(2), 67–79.
Garelli, G., & Tazzioli, M. (2013). Arab Springs making space: Territoriality and moral geographies for asylum seekers in Italy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 31(6), 1004–1021.
HABITAT III. (2015). HABITAT III issue papers 2 – migration and refugees in urban areas. http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-2_2_Migration-and-Refugees-in-Urban-Areas-2.0.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Hauge, Å. L., Støa, E., & Denizou, K. (2017). Framing outsidedness – Aspects of housing quality in decentralized reception centres for asylum seekers in Norway. Housing, Theory and Society, 34(1), 1–20.
Hes, D., & Du Plessis, C. (2015). Designing for hope. Abingdon: Routledge.
John-Richards, S. (2014). Asylum and the common: Mediations between Foucault, Agamben and Esposito. Birkbeck Law Review, 2(1), 13–36.
Katz, I. (2017). ‘The common camp’: Temporary settlements as a spatio-political instrument in Israel-Palestine. The Journal of Architecture, 22(1), 54–103.
LasciateCIEntrare. (2016). InCAStrati. http://www.cittadinanzattiva.it/files/primo_piano/giustizia/inCAStrati-report.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Manzini, E. (2015). Design, when everybody designs. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Medici per i Diritti Umani (MEDU). (2015). Report sulle condizioni di accoglienza. Cara Mineo. http://www.mediciperidirittiumani.org/pdf/REPORT_ACCOGLIENZA_MINEO_Giugno_2015.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Medici Senza Frontiere (MSF). (2015). Rapporto sulle condizioni di accoglienza nel CPSA di Pozzallo. http://archivio.medicisenzafrontiere.it/pdf/Rapporto_CPI_CPSA_Pozzallo_final.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Medici Senza Frontiere (MSF). (2016). Fuori Campo, Richiedenti asilo e rifugiati in Italia: insediamenti informali e marginalità sociale. http://fuoricampo.medicisenzafrontiere.it/Fuoricampo.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Migration Policy Group (MPG). (2016). Scoping paper on the urban reception of refugees. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/sites/futurium/files/scoping-paper-on-the-urban-reception-of-refugees-.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Ministero dell’Interno. (2016). Piano di Accoglienza 2016. Tavolo di coordinamento Nazionale. http://www.vita.it/attachment/d601c9b0-b314-46ba-b708-d4341546c2d9/ Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Oswalt, P., Overmeyer, K., & Misselwitz, P. (2013). Urban catalyst. Berlin: Dom Pub.
Rabinow, P. (1984). Space, knowledge and power, in the foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.
Regione Toscana. (2017). Libro Bianco sulle politiche di accoglienza dei richiedenti asilo politico e protezione internazionale. http://open.toscana.it/documents/438246/0/Libro+Bianco+dell%27accoglienza+in+Toscana/c57542bb-9550-4f6e-81dd-e626a57ca65e. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Röslmaierm, M. (2016) Exploring the tourism-refugee nexus. From global mobility to local immobility (MA Thesis), Mid Sweden University. http://miun.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:938722/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Rozakou, K. (2012). The biopolitics of hospitality in Greece: Humanitarianism and the management of refugees. American Ethnologist, 39(3), 562–577.
Sistema di Protezione per Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati (SPRAR). (2013). Rapporto annuale. http://www.cittalia.it/images/file/atlante_sprar_completo_2012_2013.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Sistema di Protezione per Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati (SPRAR). (2016) Rapporto annuale. http://www.sprar.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Atlante-Sprar-2016-2017-RAPPORTO-leggero.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Sistema di Protezione per Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati (SPRAR). (2017) Manuale operativo. http://www.sprar.it/images/Documenti/Quaderni_servizio_centrale/manuale.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Swiss Refugee Council. (2013). Reception conditions in Italy. https://www.refugeecouncil.ch/assets/news/english-website/131213-osar-report-italy-english.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Szczepanikova, A. (2012). Between control and assistance: The problem of European accommodation centres for asylum seekers. International Migration, 51(4), 130–143.
Tan, P. (2016). Architecture in crisis: Exception as a form of decay. ARQ, 92, 118–125.
Taran, P. (Ed.). (2016). The sustainable development goals and migrants/migration. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/events/coordination/14/documents/backgrounddocs/GMPA_14CM.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
UN HABITAT. (2016). New Urban Agenda. https://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/GA-Resolution-A-RES-71-256-New-Urban-Agenda.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
UNHCR. (2010). Collective centre guidelines. https://www.globalcccmcluster.org/system/files/publications/doc18990-contenido.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
UNHCR. (2015). Global trends, forced displacement in 2015. http://www.unhcr.org/576408cd7.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2017.
Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network-theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.
Yaneva, A. (2012). Mapping controversies in architecture. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Calcagno, G., Bologna, R. (2019). From Emergency to Integration? The Spatial Controversy of Reception Centres in Italy. In: Asgary, A. (eds) Resettlement Challenges for Displaced Populations and Refugees. Sustainable Development Goals Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92498-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92498-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92497-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92498-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)